• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔内血管化淋巴结转移治疗淋巴水肿:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。

Intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Microsurgery. 2021 Nov;41(8):802-815. doi: 10.1002/micr.30812. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1002/micr.30812
PMID:34562039
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a promising treatment for lymphedema, vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is associated with a risk of iatrogenic lymphedema. Intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node flap has been increasingly applied to minimize complication.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically. Clinical articles describing the application of intra-abdominal flaps to treat lymphedema were included. Study characteristics, patient demographics, and operative details were recorded. Primary outcomes were recorded as circumference/volume reduction, episodes of cellulitis reduction and lymph flow assessment. Secondary outcomes were recorded as donor-site complication and recipient-site complication.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with 594 patients in total. Donor-sites of flaps were omental/gastroepiploic, jejunal, ileocecal, and appendicular. The mean reduction rate ranged from 0.38% to 70.8%. Significant reduction in infectious episodes was reported in 10 studies. The pooled donor-site complication rate was 1.4% (95% CI, 0%-4.1%; I  = 40%). The pooled recipient-site complication rate was 3.2% (95% CI, 1.4%-5.5%; I  = 39%). The most common donor-site complication was minor ileus requiring prolonged nasogastric tube replacement. No donor site lymph disfunction occurred.

CONCLUSION

Intra-abdominal VLNT is an effective technique for patients with lymphedema with no obvious impairment to donor-site lymph function, as long as the operation is properly performed.

摘要

背景

作为淋巴水肿的一种有前途的治疗方法,带血管的淋巴结转移(VLNT)有发生医源性淋巴水肿的风险。腹腔内带血管的淋巴结皮瓣的应用越来越多,以尽量减少并发症。

方法

系统地检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Sciences 和 Cochrane 数据库。纳入了描述应用腹腔内皮瓣治疗淋巴水肿的临床文章。记录了研究特征、患者人口统计学和手术细节。主要结局记录为周长/体积减少、蜂窝织炎发作减少和淋巴流量评估。次要结局记录为供区并发症和受区并发症。

结果

21 项研究符合纳入标准,共 594 例患者。皮瓣的供区为网膜/胃网膜、空肠、回盲肠和阑尾。平均减少率为 0.38%至 70.8%。10 项研究报告了感染发作的显著减少。汇总的供区并发症发生率为 1.4%(95%CI,0%-4.1%;I²=40%)。汇总的受区并发症发生率为 3.2%(95%CI,1.4%-5.5%;I²=39%)。最常见的供区并发症是需要长时间鼻胃管替代的轻微肠梗阻。没有发生供区淋巴功能障碍。

结论

只要手术操作得当,腹腔内 VLNT 是治疗淋巴水肿患者的有效技术,不会明显损害供区的淋巴功能。

相似文献

1
Intra-abdominal vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.腹腔内血管化淋巴结转移治疗淋巴水肿:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Microsurgery. 2021 Nov;41(8):802-815. doi: 10.1002/micr.30812. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of vascularized lymph node transfer for breast cancer-related lymphedema.血管化淋巴结转移治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 May;10(3):786-795.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者的盆腔淋巴结清扫术及其范围对围手术期并发症的影响:全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):134-149. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
Animal Models Used in the Research of Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Systematic Review.用于血管化淋巴结移植研究的动物模型:系统评价。
J Surg Res. 2022 Apr;272:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.021. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.基于穹窿部的与基于角巩膜缘的结膜小梁切除术瓣治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 26;8(8):CD009380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009380.pub3.
10
Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.放置人工补片预防造口旁疝。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 20;7(7):CD008905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Distribution of Perigastric Station 4d Lymph Nodes in Vascularized Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Transfer: An Anatomic Study and Case Series.胃周站 4d 淋巴结在胃网膜血管化淋巴结转移中的分布:一项解剖学研究和病例系列。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3694-3704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15113-2. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
[Advances in treatment of lymphedema with supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer].[锁骨上带血管蒂淋巴结转移治疗淋巴水肿的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 15;37(6):736-741. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202302104.
3
[Research progress of combined surgical treatment of lymphedema based on vascularized lymph node transfer].
基于带血管蒂淋巴结转移术的淋巴水肿联合手术治疗研究进展
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 15;37(2):240-246. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202210009.