Suppr超能文献

针对长期慢性腰痛患者,自我效能比功能失调行为认知更重要;一项纵向研究。

Targeting self-efficacy more important than dysfunctional behavioral cognitions in patients with longstanding chronic low back pain; a longitudinal study.

机构信息

Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, P.O. Box 9011, 6500, GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04637-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary pain management programs based on cognitive behavioral training (CBT) principles have been shown moderately effective in improving daily functioning in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). To optimize health-related outcomes as daily functioning, a clear understanding of the working mechanisms of these programs is warranted. Being confident to achieve a desired outcome, i.e. self-efficacy, is suggested to be a more potent determinant for beneficial treatment outcomes than restructuring the patient's dysfunctional behavioral cognitions (pain catastrophizing and fear of movement [FoM]), but the evidence is scarce. The objective of this study was twofold: 1) to determine whether a two-week pain management program resulted in post-treatment improvements in self-efficacy and decreased dysfunctional behavioral cognitions in patients with CLBP, and 2) to examine the unique contribution of self-efficacy to improvement in post-treatment disability.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of an historical cohort study was performed, including 524 patients (59% females).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

functional status (Oswestry Disability Index v2.1a).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), FoM (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire).

ASSESSMENTS

pre-, post-treatment, 1, and 12-months follow-up. Paired Student's t-tests were applied and clinical relevancy of improvements was described using minimal clinical important changes. Adjusted multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to explore the unique contribution of self-efficacy.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 46 (SD = 9.5) years and they had longstanding CLBP (mean 12.5 [SD = 10.8] years). Mean functional status, self-efficacy, and dysfunctional behavioral cognitions improved significantly at post-treatment, with improvements maintained at 12 months follow-up. Post-treatment relevant improvements in self-efficacy and dysfunctional behavioral cognitions ranged from 62.4% (FoM) to 68.7% (self-efficacy). Post-treatment self-efficacy improved the model explaining post-treatment functional disability (basic model R = 0.49, F = 83.67, p < 0.001; final model R = 0.57, F = 85.20, p < 0.001). This was further substantiated by the relative contribution (standardized betas) of self-efficacy: 5.67 times more than catastrophizing and 9.75 times more than FoM.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting self-efficacy contributes to fast improvement in functional status for selected and motivated patients with persistent CLBP. In pain management programs and (online) self-management programs for CLBP, targeting patients' self-efficacy should have a prominent place.

摘要

背景

基于认知行为训练(CBT)原则的多学科疼痛管理方案已被证明可在一定程度上改善慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的日常功能。为了优化健康相关的结果,如日常功能,需要清楚地了解这些方案的工作机制。与重新构建患者的功能失调的行为认知(疼痛灾难化和运动恐惧[FoM])相比,对实现预期结果有信心(即自我效能)被认为是有益治疗结果的更有力决定因素,但证据有限。本研究的目的有两个:1)确定为期两周的疼痛管理方案是否会导致 CLBP 患者在治疗后自我效能提高和行为认知障碍减少;2)检查自我效能对治疗后残疾改善的独特贡献。

方法

对一项历史队列研究进行了二次分析,共纳入 524 名患者(59%为女性)。

主要结局

功能状态(Oswestry 残疾指数 v2.1a)。

次要结局

灾难化(疼痛灾难化量表)、FoM(坦帕运动恐惧量表)和自我效能(疼痛自我效能问卷)。

评估

治疗前、治疗后、1 个月和 12 个月随访。应用配对学生 t 检验,并用最小临床重要变化描述改善的临床相关性。进行了调整后的多元线性回归分析,以探讨自我效能的独特贡献。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 46 岁(标准差=9.5),患有慢性 CLBP(平均 12.5 年[标准差=10.8])。治疗后,功能状态、自我效能和行为认知障碍明显改善,12 个月随访时仍保持改善。治疗后自我效能和行为认知障碍的相关改善幅度为 62.4%(FoM)至 68.7%(自我效能)。治疗后自我效能改善了模型解释治疗后功能障碍(基本模型 R=0.49,F=83.67,p<0.001;最终模型 R=0.57,F=85.20,p<0.001)。这进一步证实了自我效能的相对贡献(标准化β):比灾难化多 5.67 倍,比 FoM 多 9.75 倍。

结论

针对自我效能的治疗有助于对有选择和积极性的慢性 CLBP 患者的功能状态快速改善。在慢性下腰痛的疼痛管理方案和(在线)自我管理方案中,针对患者的自我效能应该占据突出地位。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Low back pain: a call for action.下背痛:行动的呼吁。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2384-2388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30488-4. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.什么是下背痛以及为什么我们需要关注它。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验