Laboratório de Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil; Centro de Assistência Toxicológica, Instituto da Criança do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil; Curso de Medicina, Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laboratório de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wilderness Environ Med. 2021 Dec;32(4):522-527. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
Bites of "nonvenomous" snakes can sometimes be mistaken for the bites of venomous snakes. As an example of this confusion, this report describes confirmed bites by Philodryas olfersii and Bothrops jararaca. In the first case, a 55-y-old man with a history of controlled hypertension was bitten on his right forearm by P olfersii. Physical examination revealed extensive edema, erythema, and widespread ecchymoses throughout his right upper limb. Laboratory tests indicated leukocytosis and high D-dimer levels, but normal coagulation, suggestive of a resolved recent coagulopathy. He received only supportive treatment. In the second case, a healthy 35-y-old man was bitten by B jararaca. Although the anatomic region of the bite and the results of physical examination were similar to those in the first case, laboratory tests showed mild coagulopathy, leukocytosis, and high D-dimer levels. The patient was treated with antivenom. In both cases, the 20-min whole blood clotting test results were normal. Patients bitten by P olfersii may present with local symptoms resembling B jararaca envenomation. Without snake identification and the detection of venom-induced consumption coagulopathy, especially in places where the 20-min whole blood clotting test is the only clotting test available, it is almost impossible to establish an accurate and safe differential diagnosis. In this context, the best alternative is to take the risk of prescribing antivenom for a possible P olfersii bite rather than failing to do so for a real Bothrops bite. Late treatment for Bothrops bite can result in severe complications and sequelae.
“无毒”蛇的咬伤有时可能被误认为是毒蛇咬伤。作为这种混淆的一个例子,本报告描述了 Philodryas olfersii 和 Bothrops jararaca 确认的咬伤。在第一个病例中,一名 55 岁的男子有高血压病史,他的右前臂被 P olfersii 咬伤。体格检查显示右上肢广泛水肿、红斑和广泛瘀斑。实验室检查提示白细胞增多和 D-二聚体水平升高,但凝血正常,提示近期凝血功能障碍已得到解决。他仅接受了支持治疗。在第二个病例中,一名健康的 35 岁男子被 B jararaca 咬伤。尽管咬伤的解剖区域和体格检查结果与第一个病例相似,但实验室检查显示轻度凝血功能障碍、白细胞增多和 D-二聚体水平升高。患者接受了抗蛇毒血清治疗。在这两个病例中,20 分钟全血凝固试验结果均正常。被 P olfersii 咬伤的患者可能出现类似于 B jararaca 中毒的局部症状。如果没有对蛇进行识别和检测到由毒液引起的消耗性凝血障碍,特别是在只有 20 分钟全血凝固试验可用的地方,几乎不可能做出准确和安全的鉴别诊断。在这种情况下,最好的选择是冒着为可能的 P olfersii 咬伤开抗蛇毒血清的风险,而不是因为没有为真正的 Bothrops 咬伤开抗蛇毒血清而失败。Bothrops 咬伤的晚期治疗可能会导致严重的并发症和后遗症。