College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 1):150442. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150442. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
Glacial lakes in the Himalayas are widely distributed. Since 1900, more than 100 glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) have originated in the region, causing approximately 7000 deaths and considerable economic losses. Identifying potentially dangerous glacial lakes (PDGLs) is considered the first step in assessing GLOF risks. In this study, a more thorough inventory of PDGLs was presented that included numerous small-sized glacial lakes (<0.1 km) that were generally neglected in the Himalayas for decades. Moreover, the PDGL evaluation system was improved in response to several deficiencies, such as the selection of assessment factors, which are sometimes arbitrary without a solid scientific basis. We designed an optimality experiment to select the best combination of assessment factors from 57 factors to identify PDGLs. Based on the experiments on both drained and non-drained glacial lakes in the Sunkoshi Basin, eastern Himalayas, five assessment factors were determined to be the best combination: the mean slope of the parent glacier, the potential for mass movement into the lake, the mean slope of moraine dams, the watershed area, and the lake perimeter, corresponding to the GLOF triggers for ice avalanches, rockfalls and landslides, dam instability, heavy precipitation or other liquid inflows, and lake characteristics, respectively. We then applied the best combination of assessment factors to the 1650 glacial lakes with an area greater than 0.02 km in the Himalayas. We identified 207 glacial lakes as very high-hazard and 345 as high-hazard. It is noteworthy that in various GLOF susceptibility evaluation scenarios with different assessment factors, weighting schemes, and classification approaches, similar results for glacial lakes with high outburst potential have been obtained. The results provided here can be used as benchmark data to assess the GLOF risks for local communities.
喜马拉雅山脉广泛分布着冰川湖。自 1900 年以来,该地区已经发生了 100 多起因冰川湖溃决而引发的洪水(冰川湖溃决洪水,简称 GLOFs),造成约 7000 人死亡和巨大的经济损失。识别潜在危险的冰川湖(简称 PDGLs)被认为是评估 GLOF 风险的第一步。在本研究中,提出了一个更全面的 PDGL 清单,其中包括数十个在喜马拉雅地区几十年来通常被忽视的小型冰川湖(<0.1km)。此外,针对评估因素的选择等几个缺陷,对 PDGL 评估系统进行了改进,这些评估因素有时是任意的,没有坚实的科学依据。我们设计了一个最优化实验,从 57 个因素中选择评估因素的最佳组合,以识别 PDGLs。基于对东喜马拉雅Sinkoshi 流域有排水和无排水冰川湖的实验,确定了五个评估因素作为最佳组合:母冰川的平均坡度、向湖中大规模运动的可能性、冰碛坝的平均坡度、流域面积和湖泊周长,分别对应冰川湖溃决洪水的触发因素,如冰崩、岩崩和滑坡、坝失稳、强降水或其他液体流入、以及湖泊特征。然后,我们将最佳评估因素组合应用于喜马拉雅山脉面积大于 0.02km 的 1650 个冰川湖中。我们确定了 207 个冰川湖为极高危险,345 个为高危险。值得注意的是,在不同的 GLOF 易感性评估情景中,使用不同的评估因素、权重方案和分类方法,都得到了具有高溃决潜力的冰川湖的相似结果。这里提供的结果可以用作基准数据,以评估当地社区的 GLOF 风险。