Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200127 Shanghai, China.
School of Medicine, Tongji University, 200092 Shanghai, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 24;22(3):1019-1027. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2203111.
The populations included in the randomized controlled clinical trials and observational studies were different. The effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) varied among studies. This study aimed to estimate the real-world outcomes of rivaroxaban in patients with AF accurately. A discrete event simulation (DES) was used to predict the counterfactual results of the ROCKET AF study. The hypothetical cohorts of patients were generated using Monte Carlo simulation according to the baseline covariate distributions that matched the marginal distribution of covariates reported in the ROCKET AF and three observational studies. The DES model structure was constructed based on a priori knowledge about disease progression and possible outcomes of patients with AF. The DES model accurately replicated the overall results of the ROCKET AF study. Both predicted stroke/systematic embolism (SE) and major bleeding rates were lower in the three observational studies than in the simulated ROCKET AF study. The risk difference of stroke/SE and major bleeding was not significant among the predicted outcomes of the three observational studies. Although some differences existed in the absolute rates of stroke/SE and major bleeding between observed and simulated studies, the results confirmed that rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke/systematic embolism with no significance in the risk of major bleeding in large AF populations, which was similar to the results of ROCKET AF.
纳入随机对照临床试验和观察性研究的人群不同。利伐沙班预防心房颤动(AF)患者卒中的有效性和安全性在各研究间存在差异。本研究旨在准确评估 AF 患者使用利伐沙班的真实世界结局。采用离散事件模拟(DES)预测 ROCKET AF 研究的反事实结果。根据与 ROCKET AF 和三项观察性研究报告的协变量边际分布相匹配的基线协变量分布,使用蒙特卡罗模拟生成假设患者队列。DES 模型结构基于对 AF 患者疾病进展和可能结局的先验知识构建。DES 模型准确复制了 ROCKET AF 研究的总体结果。三项观察性研究中预测的卒中/系统性栓塞(SE)和大出血发生率均低于模拟 ROCKET AF 研究。三项观察性研究预测结局中,卒中/SE 和大出血的风险差异无统计学意义。尽管观察研究和模拟研究之间在卒中/SE 和大出血的绝对发生率上存在一些差异,但结果证实,在大型 AF 人群中,利伐沙班在预防卒中/SE 方面与华法林相当,且大出血风险无统计学意义,与 ROCKET AF 结果相似。