Wagner Andrea, Groetsch Christiane, Wilfling Sibylle, Schebesch Karl-Michael, Kilic Mustafa, Nenkov Marjan, Wendl Christina, Linker Ralf A, Schlachetzki Felix
Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, Bezirksklinikum, Universitätsstraße 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Neurol Res Pract. 2021 Sep 27;3(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s42466-021-00152-x.
The modified Boston criteria (mBC) define the probability for the diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Its initial clinical presentation differs from asymptomatic cerebral microbleedings (cMBs), acute ischemic stroke (AIS), cortical hemosiderosis (cSS), to lobar ICH (lICH).
Retrospective analyses and clinical follow-ups of individuals with at least mBC "possible" CAA from 2005 to 2018.
149 patients were classified in subgroups due to the index event: lICH (n = 91), AIS (n = 32), > 3 cMBs only (n = 16) and cSS (n = 10). Patients in the lICH subgroup had a significantly higher percentage of single new lICHs compared to other groups, whereas patients in the AIS-group had a significantly higher percentage of multiple new AIS. cMBs as index event predisposed for AIS during follow up (p < 0.0016). Patients of the cMBs- or cSS-group showed significantly more TFNEs (transient focal-neurological episodes) and lower numbers of asymptomatic patients (for epilepsy and TFNEs) at the index event than patients with lICH or AIS (p < 0.0013). At long-term follow-up, the cMBs- and cSS-group were characterized by more TFNEs and fewer asymptomatic patients.
A new classification system of CAA should add subgroups according to the initial clinical presentation to the mBCs allowing individual prognosis, acute treatment and secondary prophylaxis.
改良波士顿标准(mBC)用于定义脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)的诊断概率。其初始临床表现从无症状性脑微出血(cMBs)、急性缺血性卒中(AIS)、皮质铁沉积(cSS)到脑叶脑出血(lICH)各不相同。
对2005年至2018年至少符合mBC“可能”CAA标准的个体进行回顾性分析和临床随访。
根据首发事件,149例患者被分为不同亚组:脑叶脑出血(n = 91)、急性缺血性卒中(n = 32)、仅>3个脑微出血(n = 16)和皮质铁沉积(n = 10)。与其他组相比,脑叶脑出血亚组的单发新脑叶脑出血患者比例显著更高,而急性缺血性卒中组的多发新急性缺血性卒中患者比例显著更高。脑微出血作为首发事件在随访期间易导致急性缺血性卒中(p < 0.0016)。与脑叶脑出血或急性缺血性卒中患者相比,脑微出血或皮质铁沉积组患者在首发事件时出现短暂性局灶性神经发作(TFNEs)的情况显著更多,无症状患者(癫痫和短暂性局灶性神经发作方面)数量更少(p < 0.0013)。在长期随访中,脑微出血和皮质铁沉积组的特点是短暂性局灶性神经发作更多,无症状患者更少。
CAA的新分类系统应在改良波士顿标准基础上,根据初始临床表现增加亚组分类,以实现个体预后评估、急性治疗和二级预防。