Divisions of UCMC and WCH Trauma, Section of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Injury. 2022 Jan;53(1):137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Chest wall injuries are very common in blunt trauma and development of treatment protocols can significantly improve outcomes. Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures (SSRF) is an adjunct for the most severe chest injuries and can be used as a part of a comprehensive approach to chest injuries care. We hypothesized that implementation of a SSRF programme program would result in improved short-term outcomes.
The characteristics of the initial group of SSRF patients (Early-SSRF) were used to identify matching factors. Patients prior to SSRF protocol underwent a propensity score match, followed by screening for operative indications and contraindications. After exclusions, a non-operative (Non-Op) cohort was defined (n=36) resulting in an approximately 1:1 match. An overall operative cohort, inclusive of Early-SSRF and all subsequent operative patients, was defined (All- SSRF). A before-and-after analysis using chi-squared, Students T-tests, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to assess significance at the level of 0.05.
Early-SSRF (n=22) and All-SSRF (n=45) were compared to Non-Op (n=36). The selection process resulted in well matched groups, and equally well-balanced operative indications between the groups. The Early-SSRF group demonstrated shortened duration of mechanical ventilation and a decreased frequency of being discharged a long-term acute care hospital. The All-SSRF group again demonstrated markedly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared to Non-Op (median 6 days vs 16 days, p < 0.01), more decrease discharge to a long-term acute care hospital (9% vs. 36%, p=0.01), and reduced risk for tracheostomy (8.9% vs. 33.3% respectively, p<0.01) CONCLUSION: The introduction of an operative rib fixation to a comprehensive chest wall injury protocol can produce improvements in clinical outcomes that decrease time on the ventilator and tracheostomy rates, and result in more patients being discharged to home. Creation and implementation of a chest wall injury protocol to include SSRF requires a multidisciplinary approach and thoughtful patient selection.
胸部创伤在钝性创伤中非常常见,制定治疗方案可以显著改善预后。肋骨骨折的外科固定(SSRF)是最严重胸部创伤的辅助治疗方法,可作为胸部创伤治疗的综合方法的一部分。我们假设实施 SSRF 方案会改善短期结果。
使用最初的 SSRF 患者组(早期 SSRF)的特征来确定匹配因素。在 SSRF 方案之前,患者进行倾向评分匹配,然后筛选手术适应证和禁忌证。排除后,定义非手术(非手术)组(n=36),大约为 1:1 匹配。定义一个包含早期 SSRF 和所有后续手术患者的整体手术组(所有 SSRF)。使用卡方检验、学生 t 检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行前后分析,以 0.05 的水平评估显著性。
将早期 SSRF(n=22)和所有 SSRF(n=45)与非手术(n=36)进行比较。选择过程产生了匹配良好的组,并且组间手术适应证也同样平衡。早期 SSRF 组显示机械通气时间缩短,长期急性护理医院出院频率降低。所有 SSRF 组再次显示出与非手术组相比明显缩短的机械通气时间(中位数 6 天比 16 天,p<0.01),更多的出院到长期急性护理医院(9%比 36%,p=0.01),以及降低气管切开术风险(分别为 8.9%比 33.3%,p<0.01)。
将手术肋骨固定纳入综合胸壁损伤方案可改善临床结果,减少通气时间和气管切开率,并使更多患者出院回家。创建和实施包括 SSRF 的胸壁损伤方案需要多学科方法和深思熟虑的患者选择。