Xie Hai-Lun, Zhang Qi, Ruan Guo-Tian, Ge Yi-Zhong, Hu Chun-Lei, Song Meng-Meng, Song Chun-Hua, Zhang Xi, Zhang Xiao-Wei, Li Xiang-Rui, Zhang Kang-Ping, Liu Tong, Yang Ming, Tang Meng, Xu Hong-Xia, Shi Han-Ping
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery/Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Cancer Metabolism and Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 10;11:707705. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.707705. eCollection 2021.
Recently, albumin-globulin ratio (AGR), a serological indicator that reflects nutritional status and systemic inflammatory, has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of various cancers. However, there is currently no research report on its relationship with cancer cachexia.
This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of AGR in patients with cancer cachexia through a multicenter retrospective analysis.
We recruited 2,364 patients with cancer cachexia and randomly divided the patients into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. The optimal stratification method was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of AGR. The survival curve was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression proportional-hazards model was used to determine independent prognostic factors in patients with cancer cachexia. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was used to compare the prognostic performance of different malnutrition evaluation tools.
The optimal cutoff value of AGR is 1.24 in patients with cancer cachexia. Increasing AGR was associated with survival in a dose-response manner with a forward L-shape. Compared with the high AGR group, the low AGR group had a shorter overall survival; and there was consistency in training and validation cohorts. In the stratified analysis of TNM stage, AGR has good prognostic distinguishing ability for advanced patients. Multivariate survival analysis determined that low AGR was an independent risk factor affecting all-cause mortality in patients with cancer cachexia. In addition, compared with other malnutrition evaluation tools, AGR could effectively stratify the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia.
AGR was an independent prognostic factor affecting patients with cancer cachexia, especially in advanced patients. Compared with other malnutrition evaluation tools, AGR can effectively stratify the prognosis of patients with cancer cachexia.
近年来,白蛋白球蛋白比值(AGR)作为一种反映营养状况和全身炎症反应的血清学指标,已被报道与多种癌症的预后相关。然而,目前尚无关于其与癌症恶病质关系的研究报道。
本研究旨在通过多中心回顾性分析探讨AGR在癌症恶病质患者中的预后价值。
我们招募了2364例癌症恶病质患者,并以7:3的比例将患者随机分为训练队列和验证队列。采用最佳分层方法确定AGR的最佳截断值。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估生存曲线。采用Cox回归比例风险模型确定癌症恶病质患者的独立预后因素。采用时间依赖性受试者工作特征曲线比较不同营养不良评估工具的预后性能。
癌症恶病质患者AGR的最佳截断值为1.24。AGR升高与生存呈剂量反应关系且呈正向L形。与高AGR组相比,低AGR组的总生存期较短;训练队列和验证队列结果一致。在TNM分期的分层分析中,AGR对晚期患者具有良好的预后区分能力。多因素生存分析确定低AGR是影响癌症恶病质患者全因死亡率的独立危险因素。此外,与其他营养不良评估工具相比,AGR能够有效分层癌症恶病质患者的预后。
AGR是影响癌症恶病质患者,尤其是晚期患者的独立预后因素。与其他营养不良评估工具相比,AGR能够有效分层癌症恶病质患者的预后。