Equine Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Small Animal Surgery Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Aust Vet J. 2021 Dec;99(12):541-546. doi: 10.1111/avj.13122. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
Objective comparative evidence of the time to onset and duration of effect provided by local anaesthetic (LA) agents for perineural blocks in the horse is lacking. Clear knowledge of these properties is required to guide clinically appropriate agent selection and aid interpretation of response to diagnostic blocks for lameness examinations. An interventional study, with complete, randomised crossover design was used to compare time to onset and duration of skin desensitisation provided by four LA agents applied to palmar digital nerve blocks in 12 horses. Effect at each time point was determined using a pressure gauge to measure the mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) over the heel bulbs. Complete desensitisation was defined when MNT was greater than four times the pre-block baseline. Onset and duration of complete desensitisation were recorded and compared across agents using a mixed linear model. When significant (P ≤ 0.05), post-hoc paired comparisons between agents were performed against a Tukey's corrected P ≤ 0.05. Onset of complete skin desensitisation for each agent was <5 min. Duration for lidocaine (mean 25 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9-42) was shorter than bupivacaine (53 min; 95% CI 39-65), which was shorter than both prilocaine (102 min; 95% CI 81-123) and mepivacaine (107 min; 95% CI 92-121), which were not different. Although onset of complete skin desensitisation was not different for the LA agents tested, duration varied from 25 min to nearly 2 h. Prilocaine and mepivacaine provided the most prolonged duration of effect, both exceeding bupivacaine.
局部麻醉剂(LA)用于马周围神经阻滞时起效时间和作用持续时间的对照证据尚缺乏。为了指导临床选择合适的药物,并帮助解释跛行检查时诊断性阻滞的反应,需要明确了解这些特性。本研究采用完全随机交叉设计的干预研究,比较了 4 种 LA 药物应用于掌指神经阻滞时,对马皮肤脱敏起效时间和作用持续时间的影响。使用压力计测量足跟球处机械痛觉阈值(MNT)来确定每个时间点的效果。当 MNT 大于基础值的 4 倍时,定义为完全脱敏。记录并比较了各药物的完全脱敏起效时间和作用持续时间,并使用混合线性模型进行分析。当有显著差异(P≤0.05)时,采用 Tukey 校正 P≤0.05 进行事后配对比较。每种药物的完全皮肤脱敏起效时间均<5 分钟。与布比卡因(53 分钟;95%置信区间 [CI] 39-65)相比,利多卡因(25 分钟;95%CI 9-42)的持续时间较短,与布比卡因相比,丙胺卡因(102 分钟;95%CI 81-123)和甲哌卡因(107 分钟;95%CI 92-121)的持续时间也较短,但无显著差异。尽管测试的 LA 药物的完全皮肤脱敏起效时间无差异,但作用持续时间从 25 分钟到近 2 小时不等。丙胺卡因和甲哌卡因的作用持续时间最长,均超过布比卡因。