• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disaster Preparedness Among Women With a Recent Live Birth in Hawaii - Results From the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2016.夏威夷近期分娩后妇女的灾难准备情况 - 来自妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)的结果,2016 年。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Oct;16(5):2005-2014. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.274. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Emergency Preparedness in Tennessee Women with a Recent Live Birth.田纳西州近期分娩后女性的应急准备
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Aug;27(8):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03649-w. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Disparities in self-reported postpartum depression among Asian, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Women in Hawaii: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2007.夏威夷州亚裔、夏威夷裔和太平洋岛民妇女产后抑郁症的自我报告差异:孕期风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2004-2007 年。
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Sep;14(5):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0504-z. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
4
Preconception and interconception health status of women who recently gave birth to a live-born infant--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 26 reporting areas, 2004.近期生育活产婴儿的妇女孕前及孕后健康状况——美国妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),26个报告地区,2004年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007 Dec 14;56(10):1-35.
5
Surveillance for disparities in maternal health-related behaviors--selected states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000-2001.孕产妇健康相关行为差异监测——部分州,妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2000 - 2001年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004 Jul 2;53(4):1-13.
6
Monitoring progress toward achieving Maternal and Infant Healthy People 2010 objectives--19 states, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000-2003.监测实现《2010年母婴健康人群目标》的进展情况——19个州,妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),2000 - 2003年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006 Oct 6;55(9):1-11.
7
Core state preconception health indicators - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009.核心孕前健康指标 - 妊娠风险评估监测系统和行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Apr 25;63(3):1-62.
8
Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United States, 31 sites, 2000-2005.孕期前、孕期中和产后的吸烟趋势——美国孕期风险评估监测系统(PRAMS),31个地点,2000 - 2005年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009 May 29;58(4):1-29.
9
Preparedness planning for emergencies among postpartum women in arkansas during 2009.2009 年阿肯色州产后妇女紧急情况准备计划。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):e83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.006.
10
Prevalence of selected maternal behaviors and experiences, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1999.1999年妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)选定的孕产妇行为和经历的患病率
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Apr 26;51(2):1-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening Maternal and Infant Health Resilience Before Weather and Climate Disasters: Preparedness Resources from CDC's Division of Reproductive Health.加强母婴健康应对天气和气候灾害的韧性:来自美国疾病控制与预防中心生殖健康司的备灾资源。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Oct;33(10):1289-1295. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0669. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Perspectives on Emergency Preparedness Among Indigenous Pacific People in Hawaii: A Qualitative Study.夏威夷太平洋岛裔原住民对备灾的看法:一项定性研究。
J Community Health Nurs. 2024 Jul-Sep;41(3):189-202. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2024.2309375. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Emergency preparedness is a healthcare issue: COVID-19 pandemic's influence on attitudes and behaviors among a national sample of parents.应急准备是一个医疗保健问题:COVID-19 大流行对全国范围内父母群体态度和行为的影响。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2023 Jul-Aug;71:88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
Emergency Preparedness in Tennessee Women with a Recent Live Birth.田纳西州近期分娩后女性的应急准备
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Aug;27(8):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03649-w. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
5
Emergency Preparedness and Response: Highlights from the Division of Reproductive Health, 2011-2021.紧急准备和应对:生殖健康司 2011-2021 年的重点。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Dec;30(12):1673-1680. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0553.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Preparedness in Obstetrics: Meeting Unexpected Key Challenges.产科应急准备:应对意外关键挑战
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Jul/Sep;33(3):238-245. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000421.
2
Mental health and worries of pregnant women living through disaster recovery.经历灾难恢复的孕妇的心理健康与担忧
Health Care Women Int. 2019 Mar;40(3):259-277. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1535600. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of Design and Methodology.妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS):设计与方法概述。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1305-1313. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304563. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Attitudes, Motivators, and Barriers to Emergency Preparedness Using the 2016 Styles Survey.使用2016年风格调查问卷对应急准备的态度、动机和障碍
Health Promot Pract. 2020 May;21(3):448-456. doi: 10.1177/1524839918794940. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
5
Managing uncertainty: Lessons from volcanic lava disruption of transportation infrastructure in Puna, Hawaii.应对不确定性:来自夏威夷普纳地区交通基础设施遭受火山熔岩破坏的经验教训。
J Emerg Manag. 2018 Jan/Feb;16(1):29-40. doi: 10.5055/jem.2018.0351.
6
Disparity in disaster preparedness between racial/ethnic groups.种族/族裔群体在灾难准备方面的差异。
Disaster Health. 2013 Nov 8;1(2):110-116. doi: 10.4161/dish.27085. eCollection 2013 Apr-Dec.
7
Major flood related strains and pregnancy outcomes.主要的洪水相关菌株与妊娠结局。
Health Psychol. 2016 Nov;35(11):1189-1196. doi: 10.1037/hea0000386. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
8
Preparedness Perceptions, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Level of Household Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006-2010.突发公共卫生事件准备情况认知、社会人口学特征和家庭准备程度:2006-2010 年行为危险因素监测系统。
Health Secur. 2015 Sep-Oct;13(5):317-26. doi: 10.1089/hs.2014.0093. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
9
A systematic review of the health effects of prenatal exposure to disaster.对产前暴露于灾难的健康影响的系统评价。
Int J Public Health. 2015 Nov;60(7):781-7. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0699-2. Epub 2015 Aug 23.
10
The post-disaster negative health legacy: pregnancy outcomes in Louisiana after Hurricane Andrew.灾后负面健康遗产:安德鲁飓风过后路易斯安那州的妊娠结局
Disasters. 2015 Oct;39(4):665-86. doi: 10.1111/disa.12125. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

夏威夷近期分娩后妇女的灾难准备情况 - 来自妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)的结果,2016 年。

Disaster Preparedness Among Women With a Recent Live Birth in Hawaii - Results From the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2016.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Reproductive Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Oct;16(5):2005-2014. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.274. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1017/dmp.2021.274
PMID:34569461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8957617/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine emergency preparedness behaviors among women with a recent live birth in Hawaii.

METHODS

Using the 2016 Hawaii Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, we estimated weighted prevalence of 8 preparedness behaviors.

RESULTS

Among 1010 respondents (weighted response rate, 56.3%), 79.3% reported at least 1 preparedness behavior, and 11.2% performed all 8 behaviors. The prevalence of women with a recent live birth in Hawaii reporting preparedness behaviors includes: 63.0% (95% CI: 58.7-67.1%) having enough supplies at home for at least 7 days, 41.3% (95% CI: 37.1-45.6%) having an evacuation plan for their child(ren), 38.7% (95% CI: 34.5-43.0%) having methods to keep in touch, 37.8% (95% CI: 33.7-42.1%) having an emergency meeting place, 36.6% (95% CI: 32.6-40.9%) having an evacuation plan to leave home, 34.9% (95% CI: 30.9-39.2%) having emergency supplies to take with them if they have to leave quickly, 31.8% (95% CI: 27.9-36.0%) having copies of important documents, and 31.6% (95% CI: 27.7-35.8%) having practiced what to do during a disaster.

CONCLUSIONS

One in 10 women practiced all 8 behaviors, indicating more awareness efforts are needed among this population in Hawaii. The impact of preparedness interventions implemented in Hawaii can be tracked with this question over time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查夏威夷近期分娩女性的应急准备行为。

方法

利用 2016 年夏威夷妊娠风险评估监测系统,我们估计了 8 种准备行为的加权流行率。

结果

在 1010 名受访者中(加权应答率为 56.3%),79.3%报告了至少 1 种准备行为,11.2%的人实施了全部 8 种行为。夏威夷近期分娩女性的准备行为流行率包括:63.0%(95%CI:58.7-67.1%)家中备有至少 7 天的用品,41.3%(95%CI:37.1-45.6%)为孩子制定了疏散计划,38.7%(95%CI:34.5-43.0%)有保持联系的方法,37.8%(95%CI:33.7-42.1%)有紧急集合地点,36.6%(95%CI:32.6-40.9%)有离家疏散计划,34.9%(95%CI:30.9-39.2%)有紧急情况下迅速撤离所需的用品,31.8%(95%CI:27.9-36.0%)有重要文件副本,31.6%(95%CI:27.7-35.8%)有在灾难中实施过演练。

结论

每 10 名女性中就有 1 人实施了全部 8 种行为,表明夏威夷需要对这一人群进行更多的意识宣传。随着时间的推移,可以通过这一问题跟踪夏威夷实施的准备干预措施的效果。