School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA.
Department of Pathology and Neuroscience Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2021;8(s2):S325-S340. doi: 10.3233/JND-210706.
AAV-based gene therapy is an attractive approach to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients. Although the long-term consequences of a gene therapy approach for DMD are unknown, there is evidence in both DMD patients and animal models that dystrophin replacement by gene therapy leads to an anti-dystrophin immune response that is likely to limit the long-term use of these therapeutic strategies.
Our objective is to test whether the anti-dystrophin immune response is affected by immunomodulatory drugs in mdx mice after rAAV gene therapy.
mdx mice were treated with rAAV microdystrophin alone or in combination with immunomodulatory drugs. Dystrophin expression in skeletal muscle was assessed by mass spectrometry. Immune responses were assessed by immunophenotyping, western blot for anti-dystrophin antibodies and flow cytometry assays for antigen-specific T-cell cytokine expression. The impact on muscle was measured by grip strength assessment, in vivo torque, optical imaging for inflammation and H&E staining of sections to assess muscle damage.
We found that AAV-9-microdystrophin gene therapy induced expression of microdystrophin, anti-dystrophin antibodies, and T-cell cytokine responses. Immunomodulatory treatments, rituximab and VBP6 completely abrogated the anti-dystrophin antibody response. Prednisolone, CTLA4-Ig, and eplerenone showed variable efficacy in blocking the anti-dystrophin immune response. In contrast, none of the drugs completely abrogated the antigen specific IFN-γ response. AAV-microdystrophin treatment significantly reduced inflammation in both forelimbs and hindlimbs, and the addition of prednisolone and VBP6 further reduced muscle inflammation. Treatment with immunomodulatory drugs, except eplerenone, enhanced the beneficial effects of AAV-microdystrophin therapy in terms of force generation.
Our data suggest that AAV-microdystrophin treatment results in anti-dystrophin antibody and T-cell responses, and immunomodulatory treatments have variable efficacy on these responses.
基于腺相关病毒(AAV)的基因治疗是治疗杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)患者的一种有吸引力的方法。尽管 DMD 患者基因治疗的长期后果尚不清楚,但在 DMD 患者和动物模型中都有证据表明,基因治疗替代肌营养不良蛋白会导致抗肌营养不良蛋白的免疫反应,这可能限制这些治疗策略的长期使用。
我们的目的是测试免疫调节药物是否会影响 rAAV 基因治疗后的 mdx 小鼠中的抗肌营养不良蛋白免疫反应。
单独或联合使用免疫调节药物治疗 mdx 小鼠 rAAV 微肌营养不良蛋白。通过质谱法评估骨骼肌中的肌营养不良蛋白表达。通过免疫表型分析、抗肌营养不良蛋白抗体的 Western blot 和抗原特异性 T 细胞细胞因子表达的流式细胞术检测评估免疫反应。通过握力评估、体内扭矩、炎症的光学成像和评估肌肉损伤的 H&E 染色来测量对肌肉的影响。
我们发现,AAV-9-微肌营养不良蛋白基因治疗诱导微肌营养不良蛋白、抗肌营养不良蛋白抗体和 T 细胞细胞因子反应的表达。免疫调节治疗,利妥昔单抗和 VBP6 完全消除了抗肌营养不良蛋白抗体反应。泼尼松龙、CTLA4-Ig 和依普利酮在阻断抗肌营养不良蛋白免疫反应方面表现出不同的疗效。相比之下,没有一种药物能完全消除抗原特异性 IFN-γ 反应。AAV-微肌营养不良蛋白治疗显著降低了前肢和后肢的炎症,泼尼松龙和 VBP6 的加入进一步降低了肌肉炎症。除了依普利酮外,免疫调节药物治疗增强了 AAV-微肌营养不良蛋白治疗在产生力方面的有益效果。
我们的数据表明,AAV-微肌营养不良蛋白治疗会导致抗肌营养不良蛋白抗体和 T 细胞反应,免疫调节治疗对这些反应的疗效各不相同。