Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架时代经皮冠状动脉血运重建 1 支架策略治疗左主干狭窄中血管内超声和最终球囊对吻扩张对长期临床结局的影响。

Impact of intravascular ultrasound and final kissing balloon dilatation on long-term clinical outcome in percutaneous revascularization with 1-stent strategy for left main coronary artery stenosis in drug-eluting stent era.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, CHA University, CHA Gumi Medical center, Gumi.

Department of Internal Medicine.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2022 Jan 1;31(1):9-17. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use and final kissing balloon (FKB) dilatation would be standard care of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a simple 1-stent technique in unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. This study sought to investigate the impact of IVUS use and FKB dilatation on long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in PCI with a simple 1-stent technique for unprotected LMCA stenosis.

METHODS

Between June 2006 and December 2012, 255 patients who underwent PCI with 1 drug-eluting stent for LMCA stenosis were analyzed. Mean follow-up duration was 1663 ± 946 days. Long-term MACEs were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularizations.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 72 (28.2%) MACEs occurred including 38 (14.9%) deaths, 21 (8.2%) nonfatal MIs and 13 (5.1%) revascularizations. The IVUS examination and FKB dilatation were done in 158 (62.0%) and 119 (46.7%), respectively. IVUS use (20.3 versus 41.2%; log-rank P < 0.001), not FKB dilatation (30.3 versus 26.5%; log-rank P = 0.614), significantly reduced MACEs. In multivariate analysis, IVUS use was a negative predictor of MACEs [hazards ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.88; P = 0.017], whereas FKB dilatation (hazard ratio 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.80; P = 0.047) was a positive predictor of MACEs. In bifurcation LMCA stenosis, IVUS use (18.7 versus 48.0%; log-rank P < 0.001) significantly reduced MACEs. In nonbifurcation LMCA stenosis, FKB dilatation showed a trend of increased MACEs (P = 0.076).

CONCLUSION

IVUS examination is helpful in reducing clinical events in PCI for LMCA bifurcation lesions, whereas mandatory FKB dilatation after the 1-stent technique might be harmful in nonbifurcation LMCA stenosis.

摘要

背景

在无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)狭窄的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,单纯使用 1 个支架技术时,血管内超声(IVUS)的使用和最终的球囊扩张是否为标准治疗方法仍不确定。本研究旨在探讨在无保护 LMCA 狭窄的 PCI 中,单纯使用 1 个支架技术时,IVUS 的使用和球囊扩张对长期主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的影响。

方法

2006 年 6 月至 2012 年 12 月,对 255 例接受 LMCA 狭窄 1 个药物洗脱支架 PCI 的患者进行了分析。平均随访时间为 1663±946 天。长期 MACE 定义为死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)和再次血运重建。

结果

在随访期间,72 例(28.2%)发生 MACE,包括 38 例(14.9%)死亡、21 例(8.2%)非致死性 MI 和 13 例(5.1%)血运重建。IVUS 检查和 FKB 扩张分别在 158 例(62.0%)和 119 例(46.7%)中进行。IVUS 检查(20.3%对 41.2%;log-rank P<0.001),而非 FKB 扩张(30.3%对 26.5%;log-rank P=0.614)显著降低了 MACE。多因素分析显示,IVUS 检查是 MACE 的负预测因素[风险比 0.51;95%置信区间(CI)0.29-0.88;P=0.017],而 FKB 扩张(风险比 1.68;95%CI,1.01-2.80;P=0.047)是 MACE 的正预测因素。在分叉 LMCA 狭窄中,IVUS 检查(18.7%对 48.0%;log-rank P<0.001)显著降低了 MACE。在非分叉 LMCA 狭窄中,FKB 扩张显示出增加 MACE 的趋势(P=0.076)。

结论

在 LMCA 分叉病变的 PCI 中,IVUS 检查有助于减少临床事件,而在非分叉 LMCA 狭窄中,在 1 个支架技术后强制性使用 FKB 扩张可能有害。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验