Su Jung-Bin
School of Finance, Qilu University of Technology, No. 3501, Daxue Road, Changqing District, Jinan 250353, China.
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Sep 1;23(9):1151. doi: 10.3390/e23091151.
This study uses the fourteen stock indices as the sample and then utilizes eight parametric volatility forecasting models and eight composed volatility forecasting models to explore whether the neural network approach and the settings of leverage effect and non-normal return distribution can promote the performance of volatility forecasting, and which one of the sixteen models possesses the best volatility forecasting performance. The eight parametric volatility forecasts models are composed of the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) or GJR-GARCH volatility specification combining with the normal, Student's t, skewed Student's t, and generalized skewed Student's t distributions. Empirical results show that, the performance for the composed volatility forecasting approach is significantly superior to that for the parametric volatility forecasting approach. Furthermore, the GJR-GARCH volatility specification has better performance than the GARCH one. In addition, the non-normal distribution does not have better forecasting performance than the normal distribution. In addition, the GJR-GARCH model combined with both the normal distribution and a neural network approach has the best performance of volatility forecasting among sixteen models. Thus, a neural network approach significantly promotes the performance of volatility forecasting. On the other hand, the setting of leverage effect can encourage the performance of volatility forecasting whereas the setting of non-normal distribution cannot.
本研究以14个股票指数为样本,运用8个参数波动率预测模型和8个组合波动率预测模型,探讨神经网络方法以及杠杆效应和非正态收益分布的设定是否能提升波动率预测的性能,以及16个模型中哪一个具有最佳的波动率预测性能。8个参数波动率预测模型由广义自回归条件异方差(GARCH)或GJR - GARCH波动率设定与正态分布、学生t分布、偏态学生t分布和广义偏态学生t分布相结合构成。实证结果表明,组合波动率预测方法的性能显著优于参数波动率预测方法。此外,GJR - GARCH波动率设定比GARCH波动率设定具有更好的性能。另外,非正态分布的预测性能并不优于正态分布。此外,在16个模型中,结合正态分布和神经网络方法的GJR - GARCH模型具有最佳的波动率预测性能。因此,神经网络方法显著提升了波动率预测的性能。另一方面,杠杆效应的设定能够促进波动率预测的性能,而非正态分布的设定则不能。