Electrocardiography-gated CT for acute aortic syndrome: quantifying the potential impact of subspecialty national recommendations on emergency general radiology reporting.

AIM

To evaluate the detection of acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and the prevalence of alternative diagnoses that may explain the presentation or require follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, blinded re-evaluation of consecutive electrocardiography (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) aortic studies by a cardiovascular radiologist performed between September 2019 and May 2020 in a tertiary-referral cardiothoracic centre.

RESULTS

There were 118 identified examinations, six examinations were excluded leaving 112 (mean age = 61 ± 17; 56% male). Three cases of AAS were present (prevalence 2.7%); only one was reported on initial review. There were no false-positive diagnoses of AAS. The heart was mentioned in 79 (70.5%) reports and 73 (65.2%) of reviews revealed a total of 114 new observations; 111 (97.4%) of these were cardiovascular with 44/112 (39.3%) patients potentially having a significant previously unsuspected cardiovascular diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of national clinical guidance to increase testing and improve image quality led to a series of challenges. The real value of ECG-gated CT may lie in detecting other diseases that mimic AAS. With the additional workload, increased subspecialty expertise is required but there needs to be a willingness to learn with an adequate support infrastructure.