• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受万古霉素联合β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗的中国患者急性肾损伤的比较患病率:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparative Prevalence of Acute Kidney Injury in Chinese Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concurrent β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.

Department of Nephrology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2021 Oct;43(10):e319-e351. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.008
PMID:34579971
Abstract

PURPOSE

The combination of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam (VAN + PTZ) provides a broad spectrum of activity against multiple pathogens. However, a major issue in previous research concerned significant nephrotoxicity associated with this drug combination, and most studies have been conducted in American and European countries, with no similar data available from China. Therefore, this study evaluated the nephrotoxic effects of VAN + PTZ in a large-scale Chinese cohort to determine the prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in this population by comparing PTZ and vancomycin monotherapies and the combined use of vancomycin and β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified adult patients who received vancomycin either as monotherapy or in combination with PTZ or carbapenem (VAN + CAR) for at least 48 hours at Jiangsu Province Hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Patients were also evaluated for the development of AKI, defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria. Duration of vancomycin exposure, steady-state trough vancomycin concentrations, and other risk factors for AKI were assessed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to validate our results and comparatively evaluate the nephrotoxicity of β-lactam antibiotics in combination with vancomycin.

FINDINGS

In all, 752 patients were included in the present study. The prevalence of AKI was higher in the VAN + PTZ group than in the VAN and VAN + CAR groups (15.2% vs 4.0% and 6.0%, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, VAN + PTZ was still related to AKI (odds ratio [OR] = 4.37; 95% CI, 1.65-11.59; P = 0.003). The network meta-analysis indicated that VAN + PTZ was associated with a significantly higher risk for AKI than was VAN (OR = 3.23; 95% CI, 2.50-4.35), PTZ (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.92-4.12), VAN + cefepime (FEP) (OR = 2.37; 95% CI, 1.80-3.19), or VAN + CAR (OR = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.64-3.21). However, there was no significant difference with respect to AKI prevalence among the VAN, PTZ, VAN + FEP, and VAN + CAR groups.

IMPLICATIONS

The prevalence of AKI was higher with VAN + PTZ therapy than with VAN or PTZ monotherapy or with the concurrent use of VAN and FEP or CAR in our study. Clinicians should adequately assess renal function and consider this differential risk for nephrotoxicity when choosing empiric antibiotics in hospitalized patients to minimize the rates of AKI.

摘要

目的

万古霉素和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(VAN+PTZ)联合使用具有针对多种病原体的广谱活性。然而,以往研究中的一个主要问题是该药物联合使用会导致明显的肾毒性,并且大多数研究都在美国和欧洲进行,中国没有类似的数据。因此,本研究评估了 VAN+PTZ 在大规模中国队列中的肾毒性作用,通过比较 PTZ 和万古霉素单药治疗以及万古霉素和β-内酰胺类抗生素联合使用,来确定该人群中急性肾损伤(AKI)的患病率。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在江苏省人民医院至少接受万古霉素单药或与 PTZ 或碳青霉烯类(VAN+CAR)联合治疗 48 小时以上的成年患者。根据肾脏疾病改善全球结局(KDIGO)标准评估 AKI 的发生情况。评估了万古霉素暴露时间、稳态谷浓度和其他 AKI 风险因素。进行了贝叶斯网络荟萃分析以验证我们的结果,并比较评估了与万古霉素联合使用的β-内酰胺类抗生素的肾毒性。

结果

本研究共纳入 752 例患者。VAN+PTZ 组 AKI 患病率高于 VAN 组和 VAN+CAR 组(15.2%比 4.0%和 6.0%)。调整混杂因素后,VAN+PTZ 仍与 AKI 相关(比值比[OR]为 4.37;95%置信区间,1.65-11.59;P=0.003)。网络荟萃分析表明,VAN+PTZ 与 AKI 的风险显著高于 VAN(OR=3.23;95%置信区间,2.50-4.35)、PTZ(OR=2.86;95%置信区间,1.92-4.12)、VAN+头孢吡肟(FEP)(OR=2.37;95%置信区间,1.80-3.19)或 VAN+CAR(OR=2.28;95%置信区间,1.64-3.21)。然而,VAN、PTZ、VAN+FEP 和 VAN+CAR 组之间 AKI 患病率无显著差异。

结论

与 VAN 单药治疗或 PTZ 单药治疗或与 VAN 和 FEP 或 CAR 同时使用相比,VAN+PTZ 治疗的 AKI 患病率更高。临床医生在选择经验性抗生素治疗住院患者时应充分评估肾功能,并考虑这种肾毒性的差异风险,以尽量降低 AKI 的发生率。

相似文献

1
Comparative Prevalence of Acute Kidney Injury in Chinese Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concurrent β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受万古霉素联合β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗的中国患者急性肾损伤的比较患病率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2021 Oct;43(10):e319-e351. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients Receiving the Combination of Vancomycin with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Meropenem.接受哌拉西林他唑巴坦或美罗培南联合万古霉素治疗的患者中急性肾损伤的发生率。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Dec;38(12):1184-1193. doi: 10.1002/phar.2179. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
3
Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime or Meropenem Associated Acute Kidney Injury in General Ward Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.万古霉素联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟或美罗培南相关的普通病房患者急性肾损伤:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Feb;37(1):80-87. doi: 10.1177/08971900221125518. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
4
Acute kidney injury in patients treated with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam: A retrospective cohort analysis.接受万古霉素和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗的患者的急性肾损伤:一项回顾性队列分析。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Feb;12(2):77-82. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2684.
5
Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Critically Ill Patients With Brief Empiric Use of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams With Vancomycin.抗菌药物降阶梯治疗策略对重症监护病房患者急性肾损伤的影响
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 24;68(9):1456-1462. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy724.
6
Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Treated with IV Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.接受静脉注射β-内酰胺类/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合治疗的患者的急性肾损伤
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 May;37(5):593-598. doi: 10.1002/phar.1918. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
7
Association of Acute Kidney Injury With Concomitant Vancomycin and Piperacillin/Tazobactam Treatment Among Hospitalized Children.住院儿童急性肾损伤与同时使用万古霉素和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的相关性
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 4;171(12):e173219. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3219.
8
Nephrotoxicity during Vancomycin Therapy in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime.万古霉素联合哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟治疗期间的肾毒性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02089-16. Print 2017 Feb.
9
Comparative Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟的重症患者急性肾损伤的比较发病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 May;36(5):463-71. doi: 10.1002/phar.1738. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin in Combination With Beta-Lactam Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam.万古霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物的肾毒性:头孢他啶-他唑巴坦与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e1444-e1455. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac670.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the risk of acute kidney injury and mortality associated with concomitant use of vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in critically ill and non-critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估在重症和非重症患者中万古霉素与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或美罗培南联合使用相关的急性肾损伤和死亡风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10227-0.
2
Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy.监测万古霉素谷浓度是否仍有益处?肾毒性和疗效的定量荟萃分析。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 28;13(6):497. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060497.
3
Detection of potential drug-drug interactions for risk of acute kidney injury: a population-based case-control study using interpretable machine-learning models.
基于人群的病例对照研究:使用可解释机器学习模型检测急性肾损伤风险的潜在药物相互作用
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 23;14:1176096. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1176096. eCollection 2023.
4
Shionone Attenuates Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury by Regulating Macrophage Polarization the ECM1/STAT5 Pathway.紫穗槐二酮通过调节巨噬细胞极化的ECM1/STAT5途径减轻脓毒症诱导的急性肾损伤。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 24;8:796743. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.796743. eCollection 2021.