• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术及体内尿路改道过程中持续使用乙酰水杨酸不会增加出血并发症:来自大型多中心队列的结果

Continuing acetylsalicylic acid during Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase hemorrhagic complications: results from a large multicentric cohort.

作者信息

Albisinni Simone, Diamand Romain, Mjaess Georges, Assenmacher Gregoire, Assenmacher Christophe, Loos Shirley, Verhoest Gregory, Holz Serge, Naudin Michel, Ploussard Guillaume, Mari Andrea, Di Maida Fabrizio, Minervini Andrea, Aoun Fouad, Tay Andrea, Issa Rami, Roumiguié Mathieu, Bajeot Anne Sophie, Simone Giuseppe, Anceschi Umberto, Umari Paolo, Sridhar Ashwin, Kelly John, Hendricksen Kees, Einerhand Sarah, Sanchez-Salas Rafael, Colomer Anna, Quackels Thierry, Peltier Alexandre, Montorsi Francesco, Briganti Alberto, Pradere Benjamin, Moschini Marco, Roumeguère Thierry

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;40(4):163.e11-163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.023
PMID:34580028
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether continuing the antiplatelet drug acetylsalicylic acid≤100mg (ASA) during Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) increases the risk of peri-and postoperative hemorrhagic complications and overall morbidity. Indeed, guidelines recommend interrupting antiplatelet therapy before radical cystectomy; however, RARC with ICUD is associated to reduced estimated blood loss and blood transfusions compared to its open counterpart.

METHODS

Data from a multicentric European database were analyzed. All participating centers maintained a prospective database of patients undergoing RARC with ICUD. We identified patients receiving antiplatelet therapy by acetylsalicylic acid ≤100mg. Patients were divided into three groups: those not taking acetylsalicylic acid (no-ASA), those where ASA was continued perioperatively (c-ASA) and those where ASA was interrupted perioperatively (i-ASA). Estimated blood loss and peri-and post-operative transfusions were recorded. Hemorrhagic complications, ischemic, thrombotic and cardiac morbidity was recorded and classified using the Clavien-Dindo score by a senior urologist.

RESULTS

640 patients were analyzed. Patients on acetylsalicylic acid were significantly older and had more comorbidities. No significant difference was found for estimated blood loss between no-ASA, c-ASA and i-ASA (280 vs. 300 vs. 200ml respectively; P = 0.09). Similarly, no significant difference was found for intraoperative (5% vs. 9% vs. 11%; P = 0.07) and postoperative transfusion rate (11% vs. 13% vs. 18%; P = 0.17). Higher ischemic complications were noted in the i-ASA group compared to no-ASA and c-ASA (4% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.03). On uni and multivariate logistic regression, continuing acetylsalicylic acid was not significantly associated to either major complications or post-operative transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-operative acetylsalicylic acid continuation in RARC with ICUD does not increase hemorrhagic complications. Interrupting acetylsalicylic acid peri-operatively may expose patients to a higher risk of ischemic events.

摘要

目的

评估在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)联合体内尿流改道(ICUD)过程中继续使用≤100mg的抗血小板药物乙酰水杨酸(ASA)是否会增加围手术期和术后出血并发症及总体发病率的风险。事实上,指南建议在根治性膀胱切除术之前中断抗血小板治疗;然而,与开放手术相比,RARC联合ICUD与估计失血量和输血减少有关。

方法

分析了来自一个多中心欧洲数据库的数据。所有参与中心都维护了接受RARC联合ICUD治疗患者的前瞻性数据库。我们确定了接受≤100mg乙酰水杨酸抗血小板治疗的患者。患者分为三组:未服用乙酰水杨酸的患者(无ASA组)、围手术期继续使用ASA的患者(c-ASA组)和围手术期中断使用ASA的患者(i-ASA组)。记录估计失血量以及围手术期和术后输血情况。由一位资深泌尿外科医生使用Clavien-Dindo评分记录并分类出血并发症、缺血性、血栓性和心脏发病率。

结果

分析了640例患者。服用乙酰水杨酸的患者年龄显著更大且合并症更多。无ASA组、c-ASA组和i-ASA组之间在估计失血量方面未发现显著差异(分别为280ml、300ml和200ml;P = 0.09)。同样,在术中输血率(5% vs. 9% vs. 11%;P = 0.07)和术后输血率方面也未发现显著差异(11% vs. 13% vs. 18%;P = 0.17)。与无ASA组和c-ASA组相比,i-ASA组的缺血性并发症更高(4% vs. 0.6% vs. 1.4%;P = 0.03)。在单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析中,继续使用乙酰水杨酸与主要并发症或术后输血均无显著关联。

结论

在RARC联合ICUD手术中围手术期继续使用乙酰水杨酸不会增加出血并发症。围手术期中断使用乙酰水杨酸可能会使患者面临更高的缺血事件风险。

相似文献

1
Continuing acetylsalicylic acid during Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion does not increase hemorrhagic complications: results from a large multicentric cohort.在机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术及体内尿路改道过程中持续使用乙酰水杨酸不会增加出血并发症:来自大型多中心队列的结果
Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;40(4):163.e11-163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.023. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of robot assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal vs intracorporeal urinary diversion.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术采用体外与体内尿流改道术的围手术期结果及并发症比较。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul-Aug;43(6):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术比较分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的数据。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
4
A comparative propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后腔内与腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局的倾向性评分匹配分析:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):265-272. doi: 10.1111/bju.15083. Epub 2020 May 16.
5
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion decreases postoperative complications only in highly comorbid patients: findings that rely on a standardized methodology recommended by the European Association of Urology Guidelines.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术仅在高度合并症患者中可降低术后并发症:这一发现基于欧洲泌尿外科学会指南推荐的标准化方法。
World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03237-5. Epub 2020 May 17.
6
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
7
Outcomes of Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion after Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内尿流改道术结果:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的研究结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1302-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.045. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Defining the Morbidity of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Adoption of the Comprehensive Complication Index.定义机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术伴体内尿流改道的发病率:采用综合并发症指数。
J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):785-792. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0843. Epub 2022 May 17.
9
Evaluating the Differences of Wound Related Complications in Robotically Assisted Radical Cystectomy vs Open Radical Cystectomy.评价机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在与伤口相关的并发症方面的差异。
Urology. 2024 Aug;190:56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.05.026. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
10
Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open: early Australian experience.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术与开放手术对比:澳大利亚早期经验
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):1028-1032. doi: 10.1111/ans.14361. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Antiaggregant and Anticoagulant Medications on Perioperative Complications in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.抗血小板和抗凝药物对上尿路尿路上皮癌围手术期并发症的影响
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Mar 20;75:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.02.007. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Antithrombotic therapy for a case report of acute myocardial infarction after laparoscopic radical cystectomy.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后急性心肌梗死病例报告的抗栓治疗
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 3;15:1477715. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1477715. eCollection 2024.