Suppr超能文献

谁能坚持到底?癌症治疗期间 6 个月运动试验中的参与者与退出者、完成者与脱落者。Phys-Can RCT 的结果。

Who makes it all the way? Participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in a 6-month exercise trial during cancer treatment. Results from the Phys-Can RCT.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Oncology and Skåne University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1739-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06576-0. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare sociodemographic, health- and exercise-related characteristics of participants vs. decliners, and completers vs. drop-outs, in an exercise intervention trial during cancer treatment.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer were invited to participate in a 6-month exercise intervention. Background data for all respondents (n = 2051) were collected at baseline by questionnaire and medical records. Additional data were collected using an extended questionnaire, physical activity monitors, and fitness testing for trial participants (n = 577). Moreover, a sub-group of decliners (n = 436) consented to additional data collection by an extended questionnaire . Data were analyzed for between-group differences using independent t-tests and chi-tests.

RESULTS

Trial participants were younger (59 ± 12yrs vs. 64 ± 11yrs, p < .001), more likely to be women (80% vs. 75%, p = .012), and scheduled for chemotherapy treatment (54% vs. 34%, p < .001), compared to decliners (n = 1391). A greater proportion had university education (60% vs 40%, p < .001), reported higher anxiety and fatigue, higher exercise self-efficacy and outcome expectations, and less kinesiophobia at baseline compared to decliners. A greater proportion of trial participants were classified as 'not physically active' at baseline; however, within the group who participated, being "physically active" at baseline was associated with trial completion. Completers (n = 410) also reported less kinesiophobia than drop-outs (n = 167).

CONCLUSION

The recruitment procedures used in comprehensive oncology exercise trials should specifically address barriers for participation among men, patients without university education and older patients. Individualized efforts should be made to enroll patients with low exercise self-efficacy and low outcome expectations of exercise. To retain participants in an ongoing exercise intervention, extra support may be needed for patients with kinesiophobia and those lacking health-enhancing exercise habits at baseline.

摘要

目的

比较癌症治疗期间进行的一项锻炼干预试验中参与者与退出者、完成者与脱落者的社会人口统计学、健康和运动相关特征。

方法

邀请新诊断为乳腺癌、前列腺癌或结直肠癌的患者参加为期 6 个月的锻炼干预。所有应答者(n=2051)在基线时通过问卷和病历收集背景数据。对于试验参与者(n=577),还使用扩展问卷、体力活动监测器和体能测试收集了额外的数据。此外,有一个退出者小组(n=436)同意通过扩展问卷进行额外的数据收集。使用独立 t 检验和卡方检验分析组间差异。

结果

与退出者(n=1391)相比,试验参与者更年轻(59±12 岁 vs. 64±11 岁,p<.001),女性比例更高(80% vs. 75%,p=.012),且计划接受化疗治疗(54% vs. 34%,p<.001)。与退出者相比,他们有更多的人受过大学教育(60% vs. 40%,p<.001),报告有更高的焦虑和疲劳,更高的运动自我效能感和运动结果预期,以及基线时更少的运动恐惧。与退出者相比,试验参与者在基线时更多地被归类为“非体力活动”;然而,在参与的人群中,基线时“体力活动”与试验完成相关。与脱落者(n=167)相比,完成者(n=410)也报告了较少的运动恐惧。

结论

综合肿瘤学锻炼试验中使用的招募程序应特别针对男性、未受过大学教育和老年患者的参与障碍。应针对运动自我效能感和运动结果预期低的患者进行个体化努力。为了保留正在进行的锻炼干预中的参与者,可能需要为基线时存在运动恐惧和缺乏健康促进锻炼习惯的患者提供额外支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91e/8727419/e49a6e92c67d/520_2021_6576_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验