Fibromyalgia Research Unit, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Apr;28(2):225-234. doi: 10.1111/jep.13615. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to test both classic and novel FM pain and non-pain symptoms to determine their practical efficacy in aiding clinicians to distinguish FM pain from other chronic pain disorders.
158 pain patients from two primary care clinics were evaluated with history, physical exam, chart review, and a questionnaire containing 26 exploratory symptoms (10 from the Symptom Impact Questionnaire (SIQR) and 16 from the FM literature)). The symptoms were rated on a 0-10 VAS for severity by those patients reporting pain over the past week. Somers' D and mean severity differences between FM and chronic pain patients without FM were used to rank the discriminatory and diagnostic contributions of symptoms.
Fifty patients (14.2%) carried a chart diagnosis of FM, 108 (30.7%) had pain but not FM, and 192 (54.5%) who had neither pain nor FM. Comparing means between the two pain groups, the 5 best differentiating symptoms (all, P < .0001) were: a persistent deep aching over most of my body, poor balance (7.4 vs 3.1), environmental sensitivity (6.8 vs 3.0), tenderness to touch (6.8 vs 3.6) and pain after exercise (8.1 vs 4.1). Notably, VAS pain though significantly higher for FM was least discriminatory (6.5 vs 5.1, P < .001). The five best symptoms generated a ROC = 0.85 and Somers' D = 0.69, an accuracy of 81%, and an odd's ratio of 14.4.
Our results herein suggest that clinicians may be well-served to consider symptoms in addition to those contained in current diagnostic criteria when recognizing FM in their chronic pain patients.
背景、目的和目标:本研究的主要目的是测试经典和新型纤维肌痛(fibromyalgia,FM)疼痛和非疼痛症状,以确定其在帮助临床医生区分 FM 疼痛与其他慢性疼痛障碍方面的实际效果。
从两个初级保健诊所招募了 158 名疼痛患者,通过病史、体格检查、病历回顾和一份包含 26 项探索性症状的问卷进行评估(10 项来自症状影响问卷(Symptom Impact Questionnaire,SIQR),16 项来自 FM 文献)。报告过去一周有疼痛的患者根据症状的严重程度对这些症状进行 0-10 VAS 评分。使用 Somers' D 和 FM 患者与无 FM 的慢性疼痛患者之间的平均严重程度差异来对症状的区分和诊断贡献进行排名。
50 名患者(14.2%)有 FM 图表诊断,108 名患者(30.7%)有疼痛但没有 FM,192 名患者(54.5%)既没有疼痛也没有 FM。比较两组疼痛患者的均值,区分效果最好的 5 个症状(均 P<0.0001)是:身体大部分区域持续的深部隐痛、平衡差(7.4 对 3.1)、环境敏感性(6.8 对 3.0)、压痛(6.8 对 3.6)和运动后疼痛(8.1 对 4.1)。值得注意的是,尽管 FM 的 VAS 疼痛明显更高,但它的区分能力最低(6.5 对 5.1,P<0.001)。这 5 个最佳症状的 ROC=0.85,Somers' D=0.69,准确率为 81%,优势比为 14.4。
我们的研究结果表明,临床医生在识别慢性疼痛患者中的 FM 时,除了考虑当前诊断标准中的症状外,还可以考虑这些症状。