Webber Jodi, Trothen Tracy J, Finlayson Marcia, Norman Kathleen E
Aging and Health Program, School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e1662-e1670. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13592. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
Moral distress occurs when one knows a morally correct action to take but feels powerless to act the way one believes is right. Moral distress has been studied in many contexts but there remains a gap in our understanding of the phenomenon as it manifests outside of hospital-based settings. The aim of this study was to explore the nature of the moral distress experience among community-based health and social care professionals working with older adults and their caregivers. Using a qualitative constructionist design, we interviewed 24 participants from a single health authority in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Participants were both urban and rurally based. Data were collected in the winter and summer of 2020 and analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis strategy. Three factors: reluctant clients, human resource shortages and system challenges, contributed to the creation of perceived morally precarious care plans, resulting in symptoms of moral distress. Study participants described frustration, guilt, anger, and grief at not being able to act consistently with their core values and provide the amount and/or quality of care their clients and unpaid caregivers deserved. We consider possible reasons for our finding that community service providers did not always respond to the consequences of moral distress symptoms in a manner similar to those in acute care contexts. Our findings suggest that study participants may have been able to cultivate moral resilience in the face of moral distress through the positive reframing of adversity and therefore maintain their overall sense of moral integrity.
当一个人知道应该采取符合道德规范的行动,但却感到无力按照自己认为正确的方式行事时,就会产生道德困扰。道德困扰已在许多背景下得到研究,但对于这一现象在医院环境之外的表现,我们的理解仍存在差距。本研究的目的是探讨在与老年人及其照顾者打交道的社区卫生和社会护理专业人员中,道德困扰体验的本质。我们采用定性建构主义设计,采访了加拿大安大略省西南部一个单一卫生机构的24名参与者。参与者既有城市居民,也有农村居民。数据于2020年冬夏两季收集,并使用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析策略进行分析。三个因素,即不情愿的客户、人力资源短缺和系统挑战,导致了被认为存在道德风险的护理计划的产生,从而引发了道德困扰症状。研究参与者描述了因无法按照自己的核心价值观行事,无法提供客户和无偿照顾者应得的护理数量和/或质量而产生的沮丧、内疚、愤怒和悲伤情绪。我们思考了我们的研究发现的可能原因,即社区服务提供者并不总是以与急性护理环境中的人类似的方式应对道德困扰症状的后果。我们的研究结果表明,研究参与者可能通过对逆境进行积极的重新构建,在面对道德困扰时培养了道德韧性,从而保持了他们整体的道德 integrity 感。 (注:这里“moral integrity”直译为“道德正直”,结合语境意译为“道德操守”可能更合适,但题目要求不添加解释,所以保留原文)