• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索拉非尼联合肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;39:101663. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101663. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101663
PMID:34583091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the standard treatment for patients with advanced HCC with improvement in survival and radiologic progression of the disease. Recently, few studies have advocated the Sorafenib + HAIC combination therapy results in better overall survival and progression-free survival than Sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced HCC. Herein, we aim to identify the best possible treatment option among the above two lines of therapy for patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

The fixed effects and a random-effects model were used to perform a meta-analysis for overall response rate overall survival, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis of the data of univariate analysis in each included trial was performed to identify the specific patient population who could be benefitted from the combination therapy.

RESULTS

Four RCTs containing 609 patients were included in the final analysis. The overall response rate (OR: 3.81; 95% CI 1.01 to 14.42; P = 0.05) and overall survival (HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.24; P > 0.05) were comparable. Subgroup analysis of OS showed that patients with Child-Pugh score B (HR: 0.30; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.72; P < 0.05) and AFP <400 ng/ml (HR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99; P < 0.05) were associated with significantly improved survival in the Sorafenib + HAIC group. Bone marrow suppression (OR: 3.76; 95% CI 2.58 to 5.48; P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the Sorafenib + HAIC group, but hepatic function impairment, constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal events, and dermatological events were comparable (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Child-Pugh score B and AFP <400 ng/ml may be benefited most from Sorafenib + HAIC combination therapy.

摘要

背景

索拉非尼是晚期 HCC 患者的标准治疗方法,可改善生存和疾病的影像学进展。最近,一些研究主张索拉非尼联合肝动脉化疗栓塞(HAIC)治疗晚期 HCC 患者的总生存期和无进展生存期优于索拉非尼单药治疗。在此,我们旨在为晚期 HCC 患者确定上述两种治疗方案中最佳的治疗选择。

方法

使用固定效应和随机效应模型对总缓解率、总生存率和不良事件进行荟萃分析。对每个纳入试验的单变量分析数据进行亚组分析,以确定哪些特定患者人群可能从联合治疗中获益。

结果

最终分析纳入了四项包含 609 例患者的 RCT。总缓解率(OR:3.81;95%CI 1.01 至 14.42;P=0.05)和总生存率(HR:0.70;95%CI 0.40 至 1.24;P>0.05)相当。OS 的亚组分析显示,Child-Pugh 评分 B(HR:0.30;95%CI 0.13 至 0.72;P<0.05)和 AFP<400ng/ml(HR:0.72;95%CI 0.52 至 0.99;P<0.05)的患者在索拉非尼联合 HAIC 组中生存获益显著。索拉非尼联合 HAIC 组骨髓抑制(OR:3.76;95%CI 2.58 至 5.48;P<0.001)显著升高,但肝功能损害、全身症状、胃肠道事件和皮肤事件相当(P>0.05)。

结论

Child-Pugh 评分 B 和 AFP<400ng/ml 的患者可能从索拉非尼联合 HAIC 治疗中获益最多。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.索拉非尼联合肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性。
Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;39:101663. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101663. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
Randomized, phase II trial of sequential hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib versus sorafenib alone as initial therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: SCOOP-2 trial.随机、Ⅱ期临床试验:序贯肝动脉灌注化疗联合索拉非尼对比索拉非尼单药一线治疗晚期肝细胞癌:SCOOP-2 试验。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6198-8.
3
Sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.索拉非尼与肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝细胞癌的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;49(9):845-855. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz069.
4
Comparison of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.肝动脉灌注化疗与索拉非尼单药治疗晚期肝细胞癌患者的比较。
J Dig Dis. 2015 Sep;16(9):505-12. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12267.
5
Arterial Chemotherapy of Oxaliplatin Plus Fluorouracil Versus Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Biomolecular Exploratory, Randomized, Phase III Trial (FOHAIC-1).奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶与索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌的动脉化疗:一项生物分子探索性、随机、III 期试验(FOHAIC-1)。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 10;40(5):468-480. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01963. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
6
The efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as an alternative to sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.肝动脉灌注化疗作为晚期肝细胞癌索拉非尼替代疗法的疗效。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun;8(2):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01543.x.
7
Systematic review of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.系统评价肝动脉灌注化疗与索拉非尼治疗合并门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌患者的疗效。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;35(8):1277-1287. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15010. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝动脉灌注化疗联合索拉非尼对比索拉非尼单药治疗晚期肝细胞癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;16(6):793-802. doi: 10.1007/s12328-023-01860-4. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
9
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HICS 55): an open label, non-comparative, phase II trial.索拉非尼序贯肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期肝细胞癌的多中心、开放、非对照Ⅱ期临床研究(HICS55)
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4519-y.
10
Effect of body composition on survival benefit of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparison with sorafenib therapy.体成分对晚期肝细胞癌肝动脉灌注化疗生存获益的影响:与索拉非尼治疗的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0218136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218136. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced antitumor activity of combined hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with Lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.乐伐替尼与PD-1抑制剂联合肝动脉灌注化疗在不可切除肝细胞癌中的抗肿瘤活性增强:一项荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 12;15:1513394. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1513394. eCollection 2025.
2
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitor Showed Improved Survival for Infiltrative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.肝动脉灌注化疗联合乐伐替尼和PD - 1抑制剂可改善浸润性肝细胞癌的生存率:一项多中心队列研究
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Sep 9;11:1727-1740. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S477872. eCollection 2024.
3
Discovery of Ureido-Substituted 4-Phenylthiazole Derivatives as IGF1R Inhibitors with Potent Antiproliferative Properties.
发现具有强效抗增殖特性的 IGF1R 抑制剂的脲取代 4-苯基噻唑衍生物。
Molecules. 2024 Jun 4;29(11):2653. doi: 10.3390/molecules29112653.
4
Role of Angiogenesis and Its Biomarkers in Development of Targeted Tumor Therapies.血管生成及其生物标志物在肿瘤靶向治疗发展中的作用。
Stem Cells Int. 2024 Jan 4;2024:9077926. doi: 10.1155/2024/9077926. eCollection 2024.
5
Efficacy and safety of HAIC alone vs. HAIC combined with lenvatinib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.HAIC 单独治疗与 HAIC 联合仑伐替尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性。
Med Oncol. 2023 Apr 12;40(5):147. doi: 10.1007/s12032-023-02012-x.
6
External radiotherapy combined with sorafenib has better efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.索拉非尼联合外部放疗治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效更好:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Sep;23(5):1537-1549. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00972-4. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
7
Hepatic artery intervention combined with immune-targeted therapy is superior to sequential therapy in BCLC-C hepatocellular carcinoma.肝动脉介入联合免疫靶向治疗优于巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期 C 期肝癌的序贯治疗。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(8):5405-5416. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04386-3. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
8
A preliminary study on drug switching strategy for second-line therapy after combination treatment of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗不可切除肝细胞癌后二线治疗换药策略的初步研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 30;13:998534. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.998534. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparative effectiveness of interventional therapeutic modalities for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不可切除肝细胞癌介入治疗方式的比较有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Oncol Lett. 2022 Aug 31;24(4):366. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13486. eCollection 2022 Oct.