Suppr超能文献

基于 3.0T 增强 T1W 成像的三种不同测量方法对胃癌病变 T1a-T1b 与 T2 的鉴别诊断。

Differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 in gastric cancer lesions with three different measurement approaches based on contrast-enhanced T1W imaging at 3.0 T.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, No.168, Shanghai, China.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00672-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To explore the diagnostic value of three different measurement approaches in differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 gastric cancer (GC) lesions.

METHODS

A total of 95 consecutive patients with T1a-T2 stage of GC who performed preoperative MRI were retrospectively enrolled between January 2017 and November 2020. The parameters MRI T stage (subjective evaluation), thickness, maximum area and volume of the lesions were evaluated by two radiologists. Specific indicators including AUC, optimal cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI T stage, thickness, maximum area and volume for differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 stage lesions were calculated. The ROC curves were compared by the Delong test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical benefit.

RESULTS

The ROC curves for thickness (AUC = 0.926), maximum area (AUC = 0.902) and volume (AUC = 0.897) were all significantly better than those of the MRI T stage (AUC = 0.807) in differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 lesions, with p values of 0.004, 0.034 and 0.041, respectively. The values corresponding to the thickness (including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, PLR and NLR) were all higher than those corresponding to the MRI T stage, maximum area and volume. The DCA curves indicated that the parameter thickness could provide the highest clinical benefit if the threshold probability was above 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Thickness may provide an efficient approach to rapidly distinguish T1a-T1b from T2 stage GC lesions.

摘要

背景

探讨三种不同测量方法在鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期胃癌(GC)病变中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间 95 例接受术前 MRI 的 T1a-T2 期 GC 患者。由两位放射科医生评估 MRI T 分期(主观评估)、病变厚度、最大面积和体积等参数。计算 MRI T 分期、厚度、最大面积和体积鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期病变的 AUC、最佳截断值、敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)等特异性指标。采用 Delong 检验比较 ROC 曲线。采用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估临床获益。

结果

厚度(AUC=0.926)、最大面积(AUC=0.902)和体积(AUC=0.897)的 ROC 曲线均明显优于 MRI T 分期(AUC=0.807)在鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期病变,p 值分别为 0.004、0.034 和 0.041。厚度对应的 AUC、敏感度、特异度、准确度、PPV、NPV、PLR 和 NLR 等参数均高于 MRI T 分期、最大面积和体积。DCA 曲线表明,如果阈值概率高于 35%,参数厚度可提供最高的临床获益。

结论

厚度可能是一种快速鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期 GC 病变的有效方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验