Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, No.168, Shanghai, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
BMC Med Imaging. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12880-021-00672-7.
To explore the diagnostic value of three different measurement approaches in differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 gastric cancer (GC) lesions.
A total of 95 consecutive patients with T1a-T2 stage of GC who performed preoperative MRI were retrospectively enrolled between January 2017 and November 2020. The parameters MRI T stage (subjective evaluation), thickness, maximum area and volume of the lesions were evaluated by two radiologists. Specific indicators including AUC, optimal cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI T stage, thickness, maximum area and volume for differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 stage lesions were calculated. The ROC curves were compared by the Delong test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical benefit.
The ROC curves for thickness (AUC = 0.926), maximum area (AUC = 0.902) and volume (AUC = 0.897) were all significantly better than those of the MRI T stage (AUC = 0.807) in differentiating T1a-T1b from T2 lesions, with p values of 0.004, 0.034 and 0.041, respectively. The values corresponding to the thickness (including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, PLR and NLR) were all higher than those corresponding to the MRI T stage, maximum area and volume. The DCA curves indicated that the parameter thickness could provide the highest clinical benefit if the threshold probability was above 35%.
Thickness may provide an efficient approach to rapidly distinguish T1a-T1b from T2 stage GC lesions.
探讨三种不同测量方法在鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期胃癌(GC)病变中的诊断价值。
回顾性纳入 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间 95 例接受术前 MRI 的 T1a-T2 期 GC 患者。由两位放射科医生评估 MRI T 分期(主观评估)、病变厚度、最大面积和体积等参数。计算 MRI T 分期、厚度、最大面积和体积鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期病变的 AUC、最佳截断值、敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)等特异性指标。采用 Delong 检验比较 ROC 曲线。采用决策曲线分析(DCA)评估临床获益。
厚度(AUC=0.926)、最大面积(AUC=0.902)和体积(AUC=0.897)的 ROC 曲线均明显优于 MRI T 分期(AUC=0.807)在鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期病变,p 值分别为 0.004、0.034 和 0.041。厚度对应的 AUC、敏感度、特异度、准确度、PPV、NPV、PLR 和 NLR 等参数均高于 MRI T 分期、最大面积和体积。DCA 曲线表明,如果阈值概率高于 35%,参数厚度可提供最高的临床获益。
厚度可能是一种快速鉴别 T1a-T1b 期与 T2 期 GC 病变的有效方法。