• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用计算流体动力学对真实解剖结构下血流储备分数测量中导丝置入的影响。

Effect of guidewire insertion in fractional flow reserve procedure for real geometry using computational fluid dynamics.

机构信息

Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), Postal Code 21934, New Borg El-Arab City, P.O. Box 179, Alexandria, Egypt.

Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Biomed Eng Online. 2021 Sep 28;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00935-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12938-021-00935-y
PMID:34583689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8479905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease is an abnormal contraction of the heart supply blood vessel. It limits the oxygenated blood flow to the heart. Thus, diagnosing its severity helps physicians to select the appropriate treatment plan. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the most accurate method to pinpoint the stenosis severity. However, inserting the guidewire across stenosis may cause a false overestimation of severity.

METHODS

To estimate the errors due to guidewire insertion, reconstructed three-dimensional coronary artery geometry from a patient-specific scan is used. A comprehensive three-dimensional blood flow model is developed. Blood is considered non-Newtonian and the flow is pulsatile. The model is numerically simulated using realistic boundary conditions.

RESULTS

The FFR value is calculated and compared with the actual flow ratio. Additionally, the ratio between pressure drop and distal dynamic pressure (CDP) is studied. The obtained results for each case are compared and analyzed with the case without a guidewire. It was found that placing the guidewire leads to overestimating the severity of moderate stenosis. It reduces the FFR value from 0.43 to 0.33 with a 23.26% error compared to 0.44 actual flow ratio and the CDP increases from 5.31 to 7.2 with a 35.6% error. FFR value in mild stenosis does not have a significant change due to placing the guidewire. The FFR value decreases from 0.83 to 0.82 compared to the 0.83 actual flow ratio.

CONCLUSION

Consequently, physicians should consider these errors while deciding the treatment plan.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉疾病是一种心脏供血血管的异常收缩。它限制了含氧血液流向心脏。因此,诊断其严重程度有助于医生选择合适的治疗方案。血流储备分数(FFR)是确定狭窄严重程度的最准确方法。然而,在穿过狭窄部位插入导丝可能会导致严重程度的错误高估。

方法

为了估计由于导丝插入引起的误差,使用从患者特定扫描重建的三维冠状动脉几何形状。开发了一个全面的三维血流模型。血液被认为是非牛顿的,并且是脉动的。该模型使用真实的边界条件进行数值模拟。

结果

计算了 FFR 值并与实际流量比进行了比较。此外,还研究了压降与远端动压(CDP)的比值。对每个病例的获得结果与没有导丝的病例进行了比较和分析。结果发现,放置导丝会导致中度狭窄的严重程度高估。与实际的 0.44 流量比相比,FFR 值从 0.43 降低到 0.33,误差为 23.26%,而 CDP 从 5.31 增加到 7.2,误差为 35.6%。由于放置导丝,轻度狭窄的 FFR 值没有明显变化。与实际的 0.83 流量比相比,FFR 值从 0.83 降低到 0.82。

结论

因此,医生在决定治疗方案时应考虑这些误差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/81b3e5488b43/12938_2021_935_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/77c66fe420e8/12938_2021_935_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/c32c391d4590/12938_2021_935_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/221dc96f3448/12938_2021_935_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/fba51a557d1b/12938_2021_935_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/5cf2ca692a17/12938_2021_935_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/215146e01d79/12938_2021_935_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/8c8db6a824ba/12938_2021_935_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/b453e6b42a6f/12938_2021_935_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/89c9182b4dd8/12938_2021_935_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/9b57d6ff06bc/12938_2021_935_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/a853ed2d03ef/12938_2021_935_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/fa70de15812e/12938_2021_935_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/47a31903a726/12938_2021_935_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/eb99438c52db/12938_2021_935_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/81b3e5488b43/12938_2021_935_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/77c66fe420e8/12938_2021_935_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/c32c391d4590/12938_2021_935_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/221dc96f3448/12938_2021_935_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/fba51a557d1b/12938_2021_935_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/5cf2ca692a17/12938_2021_935_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/215146e01d79/12938_2021_935_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/8c8db6a824ba/12938_2021_935_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/b453e6b42a6f/12938_2021_935_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/89c9182b4dd8/12938_2021_935_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/9b57d6ff06bc/12938_2021_935_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/a853ed2d03ef/12938_2021_935_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/fa70de15812e/12938_2021_935_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/47a31903a726/12938_2021_935_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/eb99438c52db/12938_2021_935_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/120e/8479905/81b3e5488b43/12938_2021_935_Fig15_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of guidewire insertion in fractional flow reserve procedure for real geometry using computational fluid dynamics.应用计算流体动力学对真实解剖结构下血流储备分数测量中导丝置入的影响。
Biomed Eng Online. 2021 Sep 28;20(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00935-y.
2
Analysis of the effect of guidewire position on stenosis diagnosis using computational fluid dynamics.使用计算流体动力学分析导丝位置对狭窄诊断的影响。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jun;121:103777. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103777. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Influence of the pressure wire on the fractional flow reserve calculation: CFD analysis of an ideal vessel and clinical patients with stenosis.压力导丝对分流量储备计算的影响:理想血管和狭窄临床患者的 CFD 分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Oct;255:108325. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108325. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
4
Numerical analysis of the pressure drop across highly-eccentric coronary stenoses: application to the calculation of the fractional flow reserve.高度偏心性冠状动脉狭窄处压降的数值分析:在计算血流储备分数中的应用。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 May 30;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0503-7.
5
Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve.压降系数相对于血流储备分数和冠状动脉血流储备的诊断性能。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 May;26(5):188-95.
6
Diagnostic cutoff for pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: A patient-level analysis.与血流储备分数和冠状动脉血流储备相关的压力降系数的诊断阈值:一项患者水平分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 1;87(2):273-82. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26063. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Image-based computational fluid dynamics for estimating pressure drop and fractional flow reserve across iliac artery stenosis: A comparison with in-vivo measurements.基于影像的计算流体动力学在髂动脉狭窄处压降和血流储备分数估算中的应用:与体内测量的比较。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2021 Dec;37(12):e3437. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3437. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
8
Influence of heart rate on fractional flow reserve, pressure drop coefficient, and lesion flow coefficient for epicardial coronary stenosis in a porcine model.在猪模型中心率对心外膜冠状动脉狭窄的血流储备分数、压力降系数和病变血流系数的影响。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Jan;300(1):H382-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00412.2010. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
On-site evaluation of CT-based fractional flow reserve using simple boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics.应用计算流体动力学简单边界条件的 CT 基础分流量储备的现场评估。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Feb;36(2):337-346. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01709-3. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
Influence of variable native arterial diameter and vasculature status on coronary diagnostic parameters.可变的天然动脉直径和血管系统状态对冠状动脉诊断参数的影响。
J Biomech Eng. 2013 Sep;135(9):91005. doi: 10.1115/1.4024682.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Rigid-Elastic Artery Wall of Carotid and Coronary Stenosis on Hemodynamics.颈动脉和冠状动脉狭窄的刚弹性动脉壁对血流动力学的影响。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;9(11):708. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110708.
2
CT-Derived 3D Printing for Coronary Artery Cannulation Simulator Design Manufacturing.用于冠状动脉插管模拟器设计制造的CT衍生3D打印
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jul 25;9(8):338. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9080338.
3
Computational Pressure-Fluid Dynamics Applied to Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, Predicting the Prognosis of Drug-Coated Balloons Compared With Drug-Eluting Stents in STEMI Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of the effect of guidewire position on stenosis diagnosis using computational fluid dynamics.使用计算流体动力学分析导丝位置对狭窄诊断的影响。
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jun;121:103777. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103777. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Effect of side branch flow upon physiological indices in coronary artery disease.侧支血流对冠心病生理指标的影响。
J Biomech. 2020 Apr 16;103:109698. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109698. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
3
What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.
应用于微循环阻力指数的计算压力-流体动力学,预测药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的预后比较
Front Physiol. 2022 May 24;13:898659. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.898659. eCollection 2022.
计算流体动力学能告诉我们关于颅内动脉瘤的什么信息?一项荟萃分析和批判性回顾。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 May;40(5):1021-1039. doi: 10.1177/0271678X19854640. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
4
The influence of model order reduction on the computed fractional flow reserve using parameterized coronary geometries.使用参数化冠状动脉几何结构时模型降阶对计算的分数流储备的影响。
J Biomech. 2019 Jan 3;82:313-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
5
Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: Computational fluid dynamic analysis using Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models.骨组织支架的渗透性和流体流动诱导壁面剪切应力:使用牛顿和非牛顿血流模型的计算流体动力学分析。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Aug 1;99:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and incidence of seven cardiovascular diseases.1 型和 2 型糖尿病与七种心血管疾病的发病风险。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;262:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.099. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
7
Performing and Interpreting Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements in Clinical Practice: An Expert Consensus Document.临床实践中进行和解读血流储备分数测量:专家共识文件
Interv Cardiol. 2017 Sep;12(2):97-109. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:13:2.
8
A new CFD based non-invasive method for functional diagnosis of coronary stenosis.一种新的基于 CFD 的冠状动脉狭窄功能诊断的无创方法。
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Mar 22;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0468-6.
9
Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease: Historical Perspectives.冠状动脉疾病的风险因素:历史视角
Heart Views. 2017 Jul-Sep;18(3):109-114. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_106_17.
10
Interpreting results of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve in clinical practice.解读冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影衍生的血流储备分数在临床实践中的结果。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23.