• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估政府在抗击新冠疫情中的干预成效及其对教育活动的利弊:以迪雷达瓦市为例

Assessment of Government Intervention Effectiveness in Scrubbing COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Pros and Cons on Educational Activities, the Case of Dire Dawa City.

作者信息

Tesfaye Yifru Gizaw, Yazie Derso Bekele, Zewdie Shibeshi Alemayehu

机构信息

College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Dire Dawa University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dire Dawa University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 21;14:2669-2693. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S322665. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S322665
PMID:34584422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8464342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronaviruses are known as a large family of viruses known to cause respiratory infections which are considered as a pandemic by WHO and widely distributed all over the globe; causing several damages to all aspects of human being's life.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and identify the determinants of government intervention effectiveness in scrubbing COVID-19 and its pros and cons on educational activity in Dire Dawa City.

METHODS

Stratified random sampling was hired to draw a sample of teachers from a list of teachers that were taught at both selected private and public educational institutes.

RESULTS

A 57.6% of educators responded as the government was effective in mitigating the pandemic. Out of 250 educators, 9.6%, 10.8%, 8.4%, 38.4%, and 32.8% were reported that they have very poor, poor, neutral, good, and very good level of knowledge about COVID-19, respectively. The respondents' perceptions about the pandemic were rated as not very fear inducing, not fear inducing, neutral, fear inducing, and very fear inducing 3.2%, 6.4%, 6.8%, 55.2% and 28.4%, respectively. Logistic regression indicates nine predictors were significant: avoiding touching one's body with unwashed hands, disinfecting surfaces, fatigue, getting flu vaccine, individual limitation in cooperating to cease the disease, how to maintain one's mental health during the isolation, and washing for at least 20 seconds, family care, and self-isolation.

PROS

Reading, family care, watching movies and physical exercise were importance brought by the pandemic to the educators.

CONS

Teachers are obligated to stay at home, unemployment, stress, unable to conduct professional activities, cancellation of training, and loss of motivation.

CONCLUSION

The results implied us eighty-four variables were significantly associated with government intervention effectiveness, and nine predictors were significantly related with the government's intervention effectiveness in halting the pandemic from logistic regression model.

摘要

背景

冠状病毒是一大类已知会引起呼吸道感染的病毒,世界卫生组织将其视为大流行病,在全球广泛传播,对人类生活的各个方面造成了诸多损害。

目的

评估并确定在迪雷达瓦市清除新冠病毒过程中政府干预有效性的决定因素及其对教育活动的利弊。

方法

采用分层随机抽样方法,从选定的私立和公立教育机构授课的教师名单中抽取教师样本。

结果

57.6%的教育工作者认为政府在缓解疫情方面是有效的。在250名教育工作者中,分别有9.6%、10.8%、8.4%、38.4%和32.8%的人表示他们对新冠病毒的了解程度非常差、差、一般、好和非常好。受访者对疫情的看法分别被评为不太令人恐惧、不令人恐惧、一般、令人恐惧和非常令人恐惧,比例分别为3.2%、6.4%、6.8%、55.2%和28.4%。逻辑回归表明有九个预测因素具有显著性:避免用未洗的手触摸身体、对表面进行消毒、疲劳、接种流感疫苗、个人在合作控制疾病方面的局限性、在隔离期间如何保持心理健康、至少洗手20秒、家庭护理和自我隔离。

优点

疫情给教育工作者带来了阅读、家庭护理、看电影和体育锻炼等重要方面。

缺点

教师有义务居家、失业、压力、无法开展专业活动、培训取消以及动力丧失。

结论

结果表明,从逻辑回归模型来看,有84个变量与政府干预有效性显著相关,有九个预测因素与政府在阻止疫情方面的干预有效性显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/ec5b75962b1f/JMDH-14-2669-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/71ecd94c60ee/JMDH-14-2669-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/f02ffad21522/JMDH-14-2669-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/ec5b75962b1f/JMDH-14-2669-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/71ecd94c60ee/JMDH-14-2669-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/f02ffad21522/JMDH-14-2669-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b62/8464342/ec5b75962b1f/JMDH-14-2669-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Government Intervention Effectiveness in Scrubbing COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Pros and Cons on Educational Activities, the Case of Dire Dawa City.评估政府在抗击新冠疫情中的干预成效及其对教育活动的利弊:以迪雷达瓦市为例
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 21;14:2669-2693. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S322665. eCollection 2021.
2
Erratum: Assessment of Government Intervention Effectiveness in Scrubbing COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Pros and Cons on Educational Activities, The Case of Dire Dawa City [Erratum].勘误:评估政府在抗击新冠疫情中的干预效果及其对教育活动的利弊,以迪雷达瓦市为例 [勘误]
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Oct 11;14:2845-2846. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S342820. eCollection 2021.
3
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
4
The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on secondary school teachers.新冠疫情对中学教师的心理影响。
Psychiatriki. 2020 Oct-Dec;31(4):293-301. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.314.293.
5
Letter to the Editor: THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS.致编辑的信:COVID-19 大流行对精神分裂症患者的影响。
6
Letter to the Editor: THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS.致编辑的信:COVID-19 大流行对精神分裂症患者的影响。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021 Fall;32(3):219-221. doi: 10.5080/u26175.
7
Working conditions, lifestyle and mental health of Brazilian public-school teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间巴西公立学校教师的工作条件、生活方式与心理健康
Psychiatriki. 2021 Dec 20;32(4):282-289. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.045. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
8
Association Between Trust in Government and Practice of Preventive Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.信任政府与日本 COVID-19 大流行期间采取预防措施之间的关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3471-3477. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06959-3. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Knowledge and practice regarding prevention of COVID-19 among the Saudi Arabian population.沙特阿拉伯民众对新冠病毒病预防的认知与实践
Work. 2020;66(4):767-775. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203223.
10
Barriers and facilitators of adherence to social distancing recommendations during COVID-19 among a large international sample of adults.COVID-19 期间,在一个大型国际成年人样本中,社会疏离建议的遵守障碍和促进因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239795. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospitality workers' COVID-19 risk perception and depression: A contingent model based on transactional theory of stress model.酒店工作人员对新冠病毒疾病的风险认知与抑郁:基于压力交易理论模型的权变模型
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102935. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102935. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
Telemedicine in Peru as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspective from a Country with Limited Internet Access.秘鲁的 COVID-19 大流行期间的远程医疗:来自一个互联网接入有限的国家的视角。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 May 17;105(1):6-11. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0255.
3
Succumbing to the COVID-19 Pandemic-Healthcare Workers Not Satisfied and Intend to Leave Their Jobs.
死于新冠疫情——医护人员不满意并打算离职。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(2):956-965. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00418-6. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
4
Anxiety, Distress, and Turnover Intention of Healthcare Workers in Peru by Their Distance to the Epicenter during the COVID-19 Crisis.秘鲁医护人员在 COVID-19 危机期间距震中距离与其焦虑、痛苦和离职意愿的关系。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1614-1620. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0800.
5
Developing and testing a measure of COVID-19 organizational support of healthcare workers - results from Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia.开发并测试一项衡量新冠疫情期间医疗机构对医护人员支持情况的指标——来自秘鲁、厄瓜多尔和玻利维亚的结果
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Sep;291:113174. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113174. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
6
Covid-19 in Peru: from supervised walks for children to the first case of Kawasaki-like syndrome.秘鲁的新冠疫情:从儿童的监督下散步到首例川崎病样综合征病例
BMJ. 2020 Jun 22;369:m2418. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2418.
7
The Peru Approach against the COVID-19 Infodemic: Insights and Strategies.秘鲁应对新冠疫情信息疫情的方法:见解与策略。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Aug;103(2):583-586. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0536. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
8
Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy.对意大利 COVID-19 疫情的建模与全民干预措施的实施。
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):855-860. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0883-7. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: increased transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK.欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)关于2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的最新快速风险评估:欧盟/欧洲经济区及英国传播加剧。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(10). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2003121.