Georgiou Mike F, Kuker Russ A, Studenski Matthew T, Ahlman Preeti P, Witte Megan, Portelance Lorraine
Department of Radiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1611 NW 12th Avenue, JMH C-248, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
EJNMMI Res. 2021 Sep 28;11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13550-021-00837-z.
Tc-macroaggregated albumin (Tc-MAA) scintigraphy is utilized in treatment planning for Yttrium-90 (Y) Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) of liver tumors to evaluate hepatopulmonary shunting by calculating the lung shunt fraction (LSF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if LSF calculation using SPECT/CT instead of planar gamma camera imaging is more accurate and if this can potentially lead to more effective treatment planning of hepatic lesions while avoiding excessive pulmonary irradiation.
LSF calculation was obtained using two different methodologies in 85 cases from consecutive patients intended to receive Y SIRT. The first method was based on planar gamma camera imaging in the anterior and posterior views with geometric mean calculation of the LSF from regions of interest of the liver and lungs. The second method was based on segmentation of the liver and lungs from SPECT/CT images of the thorax and abdomen. The differences in planar imaging versus SPECT/CT derived LSF values along with the estimated absorbed lung mean dose (LMD) were evaluated. The LSF values were higher in planar imaging versus SPECT/CT in 81/85 cases, with a mean value of 8.5% vs. 4.6% respectively; the difference was statistically significant using a paired t-test (alpha = 0.05). In those patients who received SIRT, the estimated absorbed LMD calculated with planar imaging was significantly higher than with SPECT/CT (t-test, P < 0.005). Repeated phantom experiments using an anthropomorphic torso phantom with variable Tc activity concentrations for the liver and lungs were performed with the standard patient protocol, demonstrated improved accuracy of the LSF calculation based on SPECT/CT than planar imaging (mean overestimated value of 6% vs. 26%).
This study demonstrates that LSF calculation using planar imaging can be significantly overestimated while calculation using SPECT/CT imaging and appropriate segmentation tools can be more accurate. Minimizing the errors in obtaining the LSF can lead to more effective Y SIRT treatment planning for hepatic tumors while ensuring the lung dose will not exceed the standard acceptable safety thresholds.
锝标记的大颗粒白蛋白(Tc-MAA)闪烁扫描术用于肝脏肿瘤钇-90(Y)选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)的治疗计划,通过计算肺分流分数(LSF)来评估肝肺分流情况。本研究的目的是评估使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)而非平面伽马相机成像来计算LSF是否更准确,以及这是否有可能在避免肺部过度照射的同时,为肝脏病变制定更有效的治疗计划。
在85例拟接受Y SIRT的连续患者中,使用两种不同方法计算LSF。第一种方法基于平面伽马相机的前后位成像,通过肝脏和肺部感兴趣区的几何均值计算LSF。第二种方法基于胸部和腹部SPECT/CT图像对肝脏和肺部进行分割。评估了平面成像与SPECT/CT得出的LSF值差异以及估计的肺部平均吸收剂量(LMD)。在81/85例病例中,平面成像得出的LSF值高于SPECT/CT,平均值分别为8.5%和4.6%;使用配对t检验(α = 0.05),差异具有统计学意义。在接受SIRT的患者中,平面成像计算得出的估计LMD显著高于SPECT/CT(t检验,P < 0.005)。使用具有可变肝脏和肺部Tc活度浓度的人体躯干模型按照标准患者方案进行重复模型实验,结果表明基于SPECT/CT计算LSF的准确性高于平面成像(平均高估值分别为6%和26%)。
本研究表明,使用平面成像计算LSF可能会被显著高估,而使用SPECT/CT成像和适当的分割工具计算则更准确。尽量减少获取LSF时的误差可为肝脏肿瘤制定更有效的Y SIRT治疗计划,同时确保肺部剂量不超过标准可接受的安全阈值。