• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类和非人类骨骼中牙齿跳变的变异性:对锯片每英寸齿数估计的影响。

Tooth hop variability in human and nonhuman bone: Effect on the estimation of saw blade TPI.

作者信息

Grosso Alicia R

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2022 Jan;67(1):102-111. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14897. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.14897
PMID:34585386
Abstract

Forensic research has demonstrated that tooth hop (TH) is a valuable measurement from saw-cut bones as it can be used to estimate teeth-per-inch (TPI) of a saw used in postmortem dismemberment cases. However, error rates for TPI estimation are still under development and knowledge of how bone tissue affects TH measurements remains unclear. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effects of tissue variability through the use of different taxa on the accuracy and precision of TH measurements in the bone to estimate TPI of the blade. A total of 1766 TH measurements were analyzed from human, pig, and deer long bones cut by two 7 TPI saw blades of different tooth type. Fifty distance-between-teeth measurements before and after sawing were collected directly from each blade for comparison to bone-measured TH to assess potential effects of tooth wear on TH variability. ANOVA and F tests were used to compare mean TH and variance, respectively, by saw-species (i.e., crosscut-deer, rip-deer) and species groups (i.e., all deer, all pig), with significance determined at the p < 0.05 level. TH measurements were converted to usable TPI ranges, which would typically be presented in a forensic report. It is concluded that significant differences in TH (mm) do not necessarily reflect significant differences in associated TPI ranges of suspect blades. Forensic reports should report mean TPI ± 1.5-2.5 TPI while providing a sample size indicating number of TH measured rather than just number of cuts or cut surfaces examined.

摘要

法医研究表明,齿距(TH)是锯切骨骼的一项重要测量指标,因为它可用于估计死后分尸案件中所用锯子的每英寸齿数(TPI)。然而,TPI估计的误差率仍在研究中,而且骨组织如何影响TH测量的相关知识仍不清楚。本研究的目的是通过使用不同的分类群来研究组织变异性对骨骼中TH测量的准确性和精密度的影响,以估计锯片的TPI。对由两种不同齿型的7 TPI锯片切割的人类、猪和鹿的长骨进行了总共1766次TH测量。在锯切前后直接从每个锯片收集50次齿间距离测量值,与骨骼测量的TH进行比较,以评估牙齿磨损对TH变异性的潜在影响。分别使用方差分析和F检验,按锯的种类(即横切锯-鹿骨、纵切锯-鹿骨)和物种组(即所有鹿骨、所有猪骨)比较平均TH和方差,显著性水平确定为p < 0.05。TH测量值被转换为可用的TPI范围,这通常会在法医报告中呈现。得出的结论是,TH(毫米)的显著差异不一定反映嫌疑锯片相关TPI范围的显著差异。法医报告应报告平均TPI ± 1.5 - 2.5 TPI,同时提供样本量,表明测量的TH数量,而不仅仅是检查的切口或切割面数量。

相似文献

1
Tooth hop variability in human and nonhuman bone: Effect on the estimation of saw blade TPI.人类和非人类骨骼中牙齿跳变的变异性:对锯片每英寸齿数估计的影响。
J Forensic Sci. 2022 Jan;67(1):102-111. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14897. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Analysis of false starts lesions on human bones produced by two hand saws with high TPI.两种高 TPI 手锯在人骨上造成的假启动损伤分析。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Mar;134(2):613-618. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02251-x. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
Saw marks in bone: A preliminary empirical study to inform decision making and best practice.骨上的锯痕:为决策和最佳实践提供信息的初步经验研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Dec;353:111857. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111857. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Effects of a low-velocity fluvial environment on saw mark evidence in bone.低速河流环境对骨骼上锯痕证据的影响。
J Forensic Sci. 2023 Jan;68(1):35-45. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15170. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
5
Comparison of false starts by saw created on flesh and dry bones; as close as possible to the real conditions of criminal dismemberment.比较在鲜肉和干骨上使用电锯造成的假启动;尽可能接近犯罪肢解的真实条件。
Int J Legal Med. 2024 Sep;138(5):2157-2167. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03256-6. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
Correlation between saw blade width and kerf width.锯片宽度与切口宽度的相关性。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):25-43. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14556. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Statistical analysis of kerf mark measurements in bone.骨骼中切口痕迹测量的统计分析
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2011 Mar;7(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s12024-010-9185-6. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
8
Saw marks in bones: A study of 170 experimental false start lesions.骨骼上的锯痕:对170处实验性起始错误损伤的研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Nov;268:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Analysis of false start bone lesions produced by an electrical oscillating autopsy saw.电振动解剖锯所致假起动骨损伤分析
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Mar;134(2):543-551. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02008-1. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
Saw marks in bones: A study of "secondary features" of false start lesions.骨骼上的锯痕:对假起始损伤“次要特征”的研究。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Sep;290:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpol Review Paper of Marks and Impression Evidence 2019-2022.国际刑警组织2019 - 2022年痕迹与印记证据审查报告
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jan 5;6:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100308. eCollection 2023.