Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Infect Dis (Lond). 2022 Feb;54(2):90-98. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1981549. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
Previous studies indicate hypocalcaemia as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker of corona-virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our aim was to investigate these relations in more detail in a large test cohort and an independent validation cohort.
We retrospectively included 2792 COVID-19 suspected patients that presented to the emergency department (ED) of two hospitals. Plasma calcium and ionized plasma calcium levels were compared between COVID-19 positive and negative patients, and between severe and non-severe COVID-19 patients using univariate and multivariate analyses in the first hospital ( = 1363). Severe COVID-19 was defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death within 28 d after admission. The results were validated by repeating the same analyses in the second hospital ( = 1429).
A total of 693 (24.8%) of the enrolled patients were COVID-19 positive, of whom 238 (34.3%) had severe COVID-19. In both hospitals, COVID-19 positive patients had lower plasma calcium levels than COVID-19 negative patients, regardless of correction for albumin, in univariate and multivariate analysis (Δ0.06-0.13 mmol/L, < .001). Ionized plasma calcium concentrations, with and without correction for pH, were also lower in COVID-19 positive patients in multivariate analyses (Δ0.02-0.05 mmol/L, = 567, < .001). However, we did not find a significant association between COVID-19 disease severity and plasma calcium in multivariate analyses.
Plasma calcium concentrations were lower in COVID-19 positive than COVID-19 negative patients but we found no association with disease severity in multivariate analyses. Further understanding of plasma calcium perturbation may facilitate the development of new preventive and therapeutic modalities for the current pandemic.
先前的研究表明低钙血症是 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的潜在诊断和预后标志物。我们的目的是在大型测试队列和独立验证队列中更详细地研究这些关系。
我们回顾性纳入了两家医院急诊科就诊的 2792 例 COVID-19 疑似患者。在第一家医院( = 1363)中,使用单变量和多变量分析比较 COVID-19 阳性和阴性患者以及重症和非重症 COVID-19 患者之间的血浆钙和离子化血浆钙水平。重症 COVID-19 的定义为入住重症监护病房(ICU)或入院后 28 天内死亡。在第二家医院( = 1429)中,通过重复相同的分析验证了结果。
总共纳入的患者中有 693 例(24.8%)为 COVID-19 阳性,其中 238 例(34.3%)为重症 COVID-19。在两家医院中,COVID-19 阳性患者的血浆钙水平均低于 COVID-19 阴性患者,无论是否校正白蛋白,单变量和多变量分析均如此(Δ0.06-0.13 mmol/L, < .001)。在多变量分析中,COVID-19 阳性患者的离子化血浆钙浓度,无论是否校正 pH 值,也较低(Δ0.02-0.05 mmol/L, = 567, < .001)。然而,在多变量分析中,我们未发现 COVID-19 疾病严重程度与血浆钙之间存在显著关联。
COVID-19 阳性患者的血浆钙浓度低于 COVID-19 阴性患者,但在多变量分析中未发现与疾病严重程度相关。进一步了解血浆钙的变化可能有助于为当前大流行开发新的预防和治疗方法。