Department of Cardiology and Angiology at University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Angiology at Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;44(12):1963-1971. doi: 10.1111/pace.14372. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is often time-consuming and therefore underused in a clinical setting. Novel device-based algorithms aiming to simplify optimization include a dynamic atrioventricular delay (AVD) algorithm (SyncAV, Abbott) and multipoint pacing (MPP, Abbott). This study examines the acute effect of SyncAV and MPP on electrical synchrony in patients with newly and chronically implanted CRT devices.
Patients with SyncAV and MPP enabled devices were prospectively enrolled during implant or scheduled follow-up. Blinded 12-lead electrocardiographic acute measurements of QRS duration (QRSd) were performed for intrinsic QRSd (Intrinsic), bi-ventricular pacing (BiV), MPP, BiV with SyncAV at default offset 50 ms (BiVSyncAV ), BiV with SyncAV at patient-specific optimised offset (BiVSyncAV ), MPP with SyncAV at default offset 50 ms (MPPSyncAV ), and MPP with SyncAV at patient-specific optimised offset (MPPSyncAV ).
Thirty-three patients were enrolled. QRSd for Intrinsic, BiV, MPP, BiVSyncAV , BiVSyncAV , MPPSyncAV , MPPSyncAV were 160.4 ± 20.6 ms, 141.0 ± 20.5 ms, 130.2 ± 17.2 ms, 121.7 ± 20.9 ms, 117.0 ± 19.0 ms, 121.2 ± 17.1 ms, 108.7 ± 16.5 ms respectively. MPPSyncAV led to greatest reduction of QRSd relative to Intrinsic (-31.6 ± 11.1%; p < .001), showed significantly shorter QRSd compared to all other pacing configurations (p < .001) and shortest QRSd in every patient. Shortening of QRSd was not significantly different between newly and chronically implanted devices (-51.6 ± 14.7 ms vs. -52.7 ± 21.9 ms; p = .99).
SyncAV and MPP improved acute electrical synchrony in CRT. Combining both technologies with patient-specific optimization resulted in greatest improvement, regardless of time since implantation. Whats new Novel device-based algorithms like a dynamic AVD algorithm (SyncAV, Abbott) and multipoint pacing (MPP, Abbott) aim to simplify CRT optimization. Our data show that a combination of patient tailored SyncAV optimization and MPP results in greatest improvement of electrical synchrony in CRT measured by QRS duration, regardless if programmed in newly or chronically implanted devices. This is the first study to our knowledge to examine a combination of these device-based algorithms. The results help understanding the ideal ventricular excitation in heart failure.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的优化往往很耗时,因此在临床环境中未得到充分利用。旨在简化优化的新型基于设备的算法包括动态房室延迟(AVD)算法(SyncAV,雅培)和多点起搏(MPP,雅培)。本研究旨在研究 SyncAV 和 MPP 对新植入和慢性植入 CRT 设备患者电同步的急性影响。
在植入或计划随访期间,前瞻性招募了具有 SyncAV 和 MPP 功能的设备的患者。对固有 QRSd(Intrinsic)、双心室起搏(BiV)、MPP、SyncAV 时的默认偏移 50ms(BiVSyncAV)、SyncAV 时的患者特定优化偏移(BiVSyncAV)、MPP 时的默认偏移 50ms(MPPSyncAV)和 SyncAV 时的患者特定优化偏移(MPPSyncAV)进行了 12 导联心电图急性 QRS 持续时间(QRSd)的盲测。
共纳入 33 例患者。固有、BiV、MPP、BiVSyncAV、BiVSyncAV、MPPSyncAV、MPPSyncAV 的 QRSd 分别为 160.4±20.6ms、141.0±20.5ms、130.2±17.2ms、121.7±20.9ms、117.0±19.0ms、121.2±17.1ms、108.7±16.5ms。与固有值相比,MPPSyncAV 可最大程度地降低 QRSd(-31.6±11.1%;p<0.001),与所有其他起搏配置相比,MPPSyncAV 显示出更短的 QRSd(p<0.001),并且在每个患者中 QRSd 最短。新植入和慢性植入设备之间 QRSd 的缩短程度没有显著差异(-51.6±14.7ms 与-52.7±21.9ms;p=0.99)。
SyncAV 和 MPP 改善了 CRT 的急性电同步。通过将患者特定的优化与这两种技术相结合,可以实现最大程度的改善,无论植入时间长短如何。
本研究首次结合了这两种基于设备的算法,证明了 SyncAV 优化与 MPP 的组合可显著改善 CRT 患者的 QRS 持续时间所测量的电同步,无论新植入还是慢性植入设备。这些结果有助于了解心力衰竭中心脏理想的心室激动。