Human Performance and Sports Science Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Caja Rural-Seguros RGA Professional Cycling Team, Pamplona, Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Dec;22(12):1797-1804. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1987528. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
Durability and repeatability (i.e. the ability to sustain high power output values under fatigue and to endure repeated high-intensity efforts, respectively) are emerging as cycling performance determinants. We aimed to analyze whether these markers differ between professional cyclists of two competition levels (WorldTour [WT] and Proteam [PT]) during a Grand Tour. We studied 8 WT and 7 PT cyclists who competed in "La Vuelta 2020". Durability was assessed with the mean maximal power (MMP) values attained between 5 sec-30 min after different levels of mechanical work done (0-35 kJ·kg). Repeatability was assessed as the ability to repeat efforts >95% MMP. Although no differences were found for durability during the whole race ( = 0.209), a significant interaction effect was found in separate analyses by week ( = 0.011). Thus, during the first week and in the "fresh" state (0 kJ·kg), WT cyclists solely attained significantly higher MMP values for 30-min efforts. However, these differences enlarged with accumulating levels of fatigue (e.g. significantly higher MMP values in WT cyclists for 30-sec, 1-min, 5-min, 20-min and 30-min efforts after 35 kJ·kg). On the other hand, no between-group differences were found in repeatability for the whole race ( = 0.777) or in separate analyses by week ( = 0.808). In summary, the present results support the role of durability (but not of repeatability) as a performance indicator during professional cycling races. The present study suggests that cyclists from different professional team categories (WorldTour [WT] or ProTeam [PT]) show comparable mean maximal power (MMP) values during a Grand Tour when fatigue is not considered.However, WT cyclists seem to attain greater MMP values than PT ones as the race progresses (from the first to the third week) and with accumulating levels of work done (from 0 to 35 kJ·kg) during a given stage.In turn, no differences were found between WT and PT cyclists in the number of high-intensity efforts (>95% of their individual MMP) performed during the race.These findings would highlight the role of durability (the ability to attenuate fatigue-induced decline in performance during prolonged exercise) as a determining factor of cycling performance.
耐用性和可重复性(即分别在疲劳下维持高功率输出值的能力和承受多次高强度努力的能力)正在成为自行车运动表现的决定因素。我们的目的是分析在大环赛中,两个不同比赛水平(世界巡回赛 [WT] 和职业队 [PT])的职业自行车运动员之间这些标志物是否存在差异。我们研究了 8 名参加 2020 年环西班牙自行车赛的 WT 运动员和 7 名 PT 运动员。耐用性通过在不同机械功水平(0-35 kJ·kg)后 5 秒-30 分钟内达到的平均最大功率(MMP)值来评估。可重复性评估为重复努力>95%MMP 的能力。尽管在整个比赛中没有发现耐用性的差异(p=0.209),但在按周分析时发现了显著的交互效应(p=0.011)。因此,在第一周和“新鲜”状态(0 kJ·kg)下,WT 自行车运动员仅在 30 分钟的努力中达到了显著更高的 MMP 值。然而,随着疲劳的积累,这些差异增大(例如,WT 自行车运动员在 35 kJ·kg 后 30 秒、1 分钟、5 分钟、20 分钟和 30 分钟的努力中达到了显著更高的 MMP 值)。另一方面,在整个比赛(p=0.777)或按周分析(p=0.808)中,都没有发现可重复性的组间差异。总之,本研究结果支持耐用性(而非可重复性)作为职业自行车比赛中表现指标的作用。本研究表明,来自不同职业车队类别(世界巡回赛 [WT] 或职业队 [PT])的自行车运动员在不考虑疲劳的情况下,在大环赛中表现出可比的平均最大功率(MMP)值。然而,随着比赛的进行(从第一周到第三周)和随着做功水平的积累(从 0 到 35 kJ·kg),WT 自行车运动员似乎比 PT 自行车运动员达到更高的 MMP 值。相比之下,在比赛期间,WT 和 PT 自行车运动员完成的高强度努力次数(>95%的个体 MMP)没有差异。这些发现将突出耐用性(在长时间运动中减轻疲劳引起的运动表现下降的能力)作为自行车运动表现的决定因素的作用。