de Swart Merijn E, Kouwenhoven Mathilde C M, Hellingman Tessa, Kuiper Babette I, Gorter de Vries Cathelijne, Leembruggen-Vellinga Machteld, Maliepaard Niels K, Wouda Ernest J, Moraal Bastiaan, Noske David P, Postma Tjeerd J, Sanchez Aliaga Esther, Uitdehaag Bernard M J, Vandertop William P, Zonderhuis Barbara M, Kazemier Geert, de Witt Hamer Philip C, Schuur Maaike
Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Neurooncol Pract. 2021 Jul 6;8(5):559-568. doi: 10.1093/nop/npab040. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Regional collaboration and appropriate referral management are crucial in neuro-oncological care. Lack of electronic access to medical records across health care organizations impedes interhospital consultation and may lead to incomplete and delayed referrals. To improve referral management, we have established a multidisciplinary neuro-oncological triage panel (NOTP) with digital image exchange and determined the effects on lead times, costs, and time investment.
A prospective cohort study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020. All newly diagnosed patients referred to Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam were analyzed according to referral pathway: (1) standard referral (SR), (2) NOTP. The primary outcome was lead time, defined as time-to-referral, time-to-treatment, and total time (median days [interquartile range]). Secondary outcomes were costs and time investment.
In total, 225 patients were included, of whom 153 had SR and 72 NOTP referral. Patients discussed in the NOTP were referred more frequently for first neurosurgical consultation (44.7% vs 28.8%) or combined neurological and neurosurgical consultation (12.8% vs 2.5%, = .002). Time-to-referral was reduced for NOTP referral compared to SR (1 [0.25-4] vs 6 [1.5-10] days, < .001). Total time decreased from 27 [14-48] days for the standard group to 15 [12-38.25] days for the NOTP group ( = .040). Costs and time investment were comparable for both groups.
Implementation of digital referral to a multidisciplinary NOTP is feasible and leads to more swift patient-tailored referrals at comparable costs and time investment as SR. This quality improvement initiative has the potential to improve collaboration and coordination of multidisciplinary care in the field of neuro-oncology.
区域合作与适当的转诊管理在神经肿瘤护理中至关重要。医疗机构之间缺乏电子病历访问权限会阻碍医院间会诊,并可能导致转诊不完整和延迟。为了改善转诊管理,我们建立了一个具有数字图像交换功能的多学科神经肿瘤分诊小组(NOTP),并确定了其对周转时间、成本和时间投入的影响。
2019年2月至2020年3月进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。根据转诊途径对所有转诊至阿姆斯特丹脑肿瘤中心的新诊断患者进行分析:(1)标准转诊(SR),(2)NOTP。主要结局是周转时间,定义为转诊时间、治疗时间和总时间(中位数天数[四分位间距])。次要结局是成本和时间投入。
共纳入225例患者,其中153例为SR转诊,72例为NOTP转诊。在NOTP中讨论的患者首次神经外科会诊转诊频率更高(44.7%对28.8%)或神经科和神经外科联合会诊转诊频率更高(12.8%对2.5%,P = 0.002)。与SR相比,NOTP转诊的转诊时间缩短(1[0.25 - 4]天对6[1.5 - 10]天,P < 0.001)。总时间从标准组的27[14 - 48]天降至NOTP组的15[12 - 38.25]天(P = 0.040)。两组的成本和时间投入相当。
实施数字化转诊至多学科NOTP是可行的,并且在与SR相当的成本和时间投入下,能够实现更迅速的患者定制转诊。这项质量改进举措有可能改善神经肿瘤领域多学科护理的协作与协调。