Li Weili, Zhang Wenling, Sun Lixin, Wang Li, Cui Zhumei, Zhao Hongwei, Wang Danbo, Zhang Yi, Guo Jianxin, Yang Ying, Wang Wuliang, Bin Xiaonong, Lang Jinghe, Liu Ping, Chen Chunlin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanxi Provincal Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 13;11:730753. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.730753. eCollection 2021.
To compare the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with cervical cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NACT) with those who received abdominal radical hysterectomy alone (ARH).
We retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes of 1410 patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer who received NACT (n=583) or ARH (n=827). The patients in the NACT group were divided into an NACT-sensitive group and an NACT-insensitive group according to their response to chemotherapy.
The 5-year oncological outcomes were significantly better in the NACT group than in the ARH group (OS: 96.2% 91.2%, respectively, =0.002; DFS: 92.2% 87.5%, respectively, =0.016). Cox multivariate analysis suggested that NACT was independently associated with a better 5-year OS (HR=0.496; 95% CI, 0.281-0.875; =0.015), but it was not an independent factor for 5-year DFS (HR=0.760; 95% CI, 0.505-1.145; =0.189). After matching, the 5-year oncological outcomes of the NACT group were better than those of the ARH group. Cox multivariate analysis suggested that NACT was still an independent protective factor for 5-year OS (HR=0.503; 95% CI, 0.275-0.918; =0.025). The proportion of patients in the NACT group who received postoperative radiotherapy was significantly lower than that in the ARH group (<0.001). Compared to the ARH group, the NACT-sensitive group had similar results as the NACT group. The NACT-insensitive group and the ARH group had similar 5-year oncological outcomes and proportions of patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy.
Among patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer, NACT improved 5-year OS and was associated with a reduction in the proportion of patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy. These findings suggest that patients with stage IB3 cervical cancer, especially those who are sensitive to chemotherapy, might consider NACT followed by surgery.
比较接受新辅助化疗后手术(NACT)的宫颈癌患者与单纯接受腹式根治性子宫切除术(ARH)的患者的5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。
我们回顾性比较了1410例IB3期宫颈癌患者的肿瘤学结局,其中583例接受NACT,827例接受ARH。根据对化疗的反应,将NACT组患者分为NACT敏感组和NACT不敏感组。
NACT组的5年肿瘤学结局显著优于ARH组(OS分别为96.2%和91.2%,P=0.002;DFS分别为92.2%和87.5%,P=0.016)。Cox多因素分析表明,NACT与更好的5年OS独立相关(HR=0.496;95%CI,0.281-0.875;P=0.015),但不是5年DFS的独立因素(HR=0.760;95%CI,0.505-1.145;P=0.189)。匹配后,NACT组的5年肿瘤学结局优于ARH组。Cox多因素分析表明,NACT仍然是5年OS的独立保护因素(HR=0.503;95%CI,0.275-0.918;P=0.025)。NACT组接受术后放疗的患者比例显著低于ARH组(P<0.001)。与ARH组相比,NACT敏感组的结果与NACT组相似。NACT不敏感组和ARH组的5年肿瘤学结局以及接受术后放疗的患者比例相似。
在IB3期宫颈癌患者中,NACT改善了5年OS,并与接受术后放疗的患者比例降低相关。这些发现表明,IB3期宫颈癌患者,尤其是对化疗敏感的患者,可能考虑NACT后手术。