Tan Daniel S W, Geater Sarayut, Yu Chong-Jen, Tsai Chun-Ming, Hsia Te-Chun, Chen Jun, Lin Meng-Chih, Lu You, Sriuranpong Virote, Yang Cheng-Ta, Sen Paramita, Branle Fabrice, Shi Michael, Wu Yi-Long
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Internal Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020 Dec 17;2(3):100131. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100131. eCollection 2021 Mar.
In the phase 3 ASCEND-4 study, ceritinib exhibited improved progression-free survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) assessment versus the standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced rearranged NSCLC. Here, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ceritinib in the subgroup of Asian patients from the ASCEND-4 trial.
Treatment-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV rearranged nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized in a one-to-one ratio to receive either oral ceritinib 750 mg/day (fasted) daily or intravenous chemotherapy ([cisplatin 75 mg/m or carboplatin area under the curve 5-6 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m] every three wk, followed by pemetrexed maintenance). The primary end point was PFS by BIRC assessment.
Of 376 randomized patients, 158 (42.0%) were Asian (ceritinib arm: N = 76; chemotherapy arm: N = 82). The median time from randomization to the cutoff date (June 24, 2016) was 18.3 months (range = 13.5-34.2) in the Asian subgroup. The median PFS (by BIRC assessment) was 26.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.6-not estimable) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 6.7-15.0), with an estimated 34% risk reduction in PFS (hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.41-1.05) in the ceritinib arm versus chemotherapy arm. The most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea (85.5%), increased alanine aminotransferase and vomiting (73.7% each), and increased aspartate aminotransferase and nausea (69.7% each) in the ceritinib arm, and nausea (49.3%), vomiting (42.7%), and anemia (40.0%) in the chemotherapy arm.
Ceritinib was effective and safe in treatment-naive Asian patients with advanced rearranged NSCLC. The findings were largely consistent with that of the overall study population.
在3期ASCEND - 4研究中,与标准一线化疗相比,色瑞替尼经盲态独立评审委员会(BIRC)评估显示晚期重排非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的无进展生存期(PFS)得到改善。在此,我们评估了色瑞替尼在ASCEND - 4试验亚洲患者亚组中的疗效和安全性。
初治的IIIB期或IV期重排非鳞状NSCLC患者按1:1比例随机分组,分别接受口服色瑞替尼750 mg/天(空腹)或静脉化疗([顺铂75 mg/m²或卡铂曲线下面积5 - 6加培美曲塞500 mg/m²],每3周一次,随后培美曲塞维持治疗)。主要终点是BIRC评估的PFS。
在376例随机分组患者中,158例(42.0%)为亚洲人(色瑞替尼组:N = 76;化疗组:N = 82)。亚洲亚组从随机分组到截止日期(2016年6月24日)的中位时间为18.3个月(范围 = 13.5 - 34.2)。色瑞替尼组与化疗组相比,BIRC评估的中位PFS分别为26.3个月(95%置信区间[CI]:8.6 - 不可估计)和10.6个月(95% CI:6.7 - 15.0),PFS风险估计降低34%(风险比 = 0.66,95% CI:0.41 - 1.05)。色瑞替尼组任何级别的最常见不良事件为腹泻(85.5%)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高和呕吐(各73.7%)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶升高和恶心(各69.7%),化疗组为恶心(49.3%)、呕吐(42.7%)和贫血(40.0%)。
色瑞替尼在初治的晚期重排NSCLC亚洲患者中有效且安全。这些结果与总体研究人群的结果基本一致。