• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ABILHAND 问卷测定脑卒中患者上肢运动能力的临床解读和截断值。

Clinical interpretation and cutoff scores for manual ability measured by the ABILHAND questionnaire in people with stroke.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Jan;30(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1978631. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1080/10749357.2021.1978631
PMID:34590536
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ABILHAND questionnaire is recommended to assess perceived manual ability after stroke; however, more knowledge on interpretability is needed to improve the clinical applicability.

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinically meaningful cutoff scores for different levels of perceived manual ability, assessed by ABILHAND, corresponding to established observed and perceived upper extremity assessments post stroke.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study, part of the Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study (SALGOT) at the University of Gothenburg, included 80 participants with upper extremity impairments after stroke. The self-reported upper extremity functioning was assessed with ABILHAND and Stroke Impact Scale Hand (SIS Hand), and the observed functioning was assessed by Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at 3 months after stroke. Receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity analyses were used to determine the cutoffs.

RESULTS

The overall discriminating accuracy was excellent (AUC > 0.90) for most of the cutoffs and sensitivity and specificity values ranged from 0.73 to 1.0. The ABILHAND cutoff score 1.78 discriminated well between low and good functioning resulting in a 95% match with SIS Hand and 87.5% match with ARAT and FMA-UE.

CONCLUSIONS

The determined cutoff scores of the ABILHAND, validated through established upper extremity assessments, will provide a useful tool to clinicians when interpreting the logit scores and when selecting individualized treatment options. ABILHAND matched well with self-reported SIS Hand, but discrepancies found with observed scales implies that self-perceived assessments should be complemented with observed assessments.

摘要

背景

ABILHAND 问卷被推荐用于评估卒中后患者的感知手功能;然而,为了提高临床适用性,需要更多关于可解释性的知识。

目的

确定 ABILHAND 评估的不同感知手功能水平的临床有意义的截断分数,与卒中后观察到和感知到的上肢评估相对应。

方法

这是哥德堡大学 Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study(SALGOT)的一项横断面研究,纳入了 80 名上肢功能障碍的卒中患者。自我报告的上肢功能通过 ABILHAND 和卒中影响量表手部(SIS Hand)进行评估,观察到的功能通过卒中后 3 个月的 Fugl-Meyer 上肢评估(FMA-UE)和动作研究上肢测试(ARAT)进行评估。使用受试者工作特征曲线、灵敏度和特异性分析来确定截断值。

结果

大多数截断值的整体判别准确性都很好(AUC > 0.90),灵敏度和特异性值范围为 0.73 到 1.0。ABILHAND 截断分数 1.78 很好地区分了低功能和高功能,与 SIS Hand 的匹配度为 95%,与 ARAT 和 FMA-UE 的匹配度为 87.5%。

结论

通过既定的上肢评估验证的 ABILHAND 截断分数将为临床医生在解释逻辑得分和选择个体化治疗方案时提供有用的工具。ABILHAND 与自我报告的 SIS Hand 匹配良好,但与观察到的量表之间的差异表明,自我感知的评估应与观察到的评估相结合。

相似文献

1
Clinical interpretation and cutoff scores for manual ability measured by the ABILHAND questionnaire in people with stroke.ABILHAND 问卷测定脑卒中患者上肢运动能力的临床解读和截断值。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Jan;30(1):21-31. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1978631. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
How Do Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scores Relate to Dexterity According to the Action Research Arm Test at 6 Months Poststroke?根据中风后6个月的动作研究手臂测试,Fugl-Meyer手臂运动评分与灵活性之间有何关系?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Oct;96(10):1845-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Which clinical and sociodemographic determinants are associated with self-perceived manual ability at one year after stroke?哪些临床和社会人口统计学因素与卒中后一年的自我感知手动能力相关?
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Aug;42(16):2279-2286. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1557265. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
4
Upper extremity self-efficacy correlates with daily hand-use of individuals with high functional capacity post-stroke.上肢自我效能与高功能能力脑卒中后个体日常手部使用相关。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jul;45(14):2301-2306. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2087764. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
5
A cohort study investigating a simple, early assessment to predict upper extremity function after stroke - a part of the SALGOT study.一项队列研究,旨在探究一种简单的早期评估方法以预测中风后的上肢功能——SALGOT研究的一部分。
BMC Neurol. 2015 Jun 18;15:92. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0349-6.
6
The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version.上肢Fugl-Meyer评估:丹麦语版本的信度、反应度和效度
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(9):934-939. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1163422. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
7
Longitudinal changes of self-perceived manual ability the first year after stroke: a cohort study.脑卒中后第一年自我感知手动能力的纵向变化:一项队列研究。
BMC Neurol. 2020 May 12;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01754-9.
8
Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke.将行动研究臂测试与Fugl-Meyer评估作为中风后上肢运动无力测量方法的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;87(7):962-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036.
9
Perceived ability to perform daily hand activities after stroke and associated factors: a cross-sectional study.中风后日常手部活动的感知能力及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Neurol. 2016 Nov 2;16(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0733-x.
10
SALGOT--Stroke Arm Longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg, prospective cohort study protocol.萨尔戈特研究-哥德堡大学脑卒中手臂纵向研究,前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMC Neurol. 2011 May 25;11:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review.中风试验中报告的量表的最小临床重要差异:一项综述。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 13;14(1):80. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010080.
2
Objectivizing Measures of Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation through Multi-Disciplinary Scales.通过多学科量表对中风后手部康复进行客观化测量。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 4;12(23):7497. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237497.