Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 1;139(11):1191-1199. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.3826.
As a disabling and frequent disease, geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) constitutes an important study subject. Emerging clinical trials require suitable end points. The characterization and validation of reading performance as a functional outcome parameter is warranted.
To prospectively evaluate reading performance in geographic atrophy and to assess its association with established visual function assessments and structural biomarkers.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The noninterventional, prospective natural history Directional Spread in Geographic Atrophy study included patients with geographic atrophy secondary to AMD who were recruited at the University Hospital in Bonn, Germany. Participants were enrolled from June 2013 to June 2016. Analysis began December 2019 and ended January 2021.
Reading acuity and reading speed were assessed using Radner charts. Longitudinal fundus autofluorescence and infrared reflectance images were semiautomatically annotated for geographic atrophy, followed by extraction of shape-descriptive variables. Linear mixed-effects models were applied to investigate the association of those variables with reading performance.
A total of 150 eyes of 85 participants were included in this study (median [IQR] age, 77.9 [72.4-82.1] years; 51 women [60%]; 34 men [40%]). Reading performance was impaired with a median (IQR) monocular reading acuity of 0.9 (0.4-1.3) logarithm of the reading acuity determination and a reading speed of 52.8 (0-123) words per minute. In the multivariable cross-sectional analysis, best-corrected visual acuity, area of geographic atrophy in the central Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) subfield, classification of noncenter vs center-involving geographic atrophy, and area of geographic atrophy in the inner-right ETDRS subfield showed strongest associations with reading acuity (cross-validated R2for reading acuity = 0.69). Regarding reading speed, the most relevant variables were best-corrected visual acuity, low-luminance visual acuity, area of geographic atrophy in the central ETDRS subfield, in the inner-right ETDRS subfield, and in the inner-upper ETDRS subfield (R2 for reading speed = 0.67). In the longitudinal analysis, a similar prediction accuracy for reading performance was determined (R2 for reading acuity = 0.73; R2 for reading speed = 0.70). Prediction accuracy did not improve when follow-up time was added as an independent variable. Binocular reading performance did not differ from reading performance in the better-seeing eye.
The association of reading acuity and speed with visual functional and structural biomarkers supports the validity of reading performance as a meaningful end point in clinical trials. These findings suggest that measures in clinical and low-vision care for patients with geographic atrophy should focus primarily on the better-seeing eye.
作为一种致残且常见的疾病,年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)所致的地图样萎缩是一个重要的研究课题。新兴的临床试验需要合适的终点。因此,有必要对阅读表现进行特征描述和验证,将其作为一种功能性的结果参数。
前瞻性评估地图样萎缩患者的阅读表现,并评估其与已建立的视觉功能评估和结构生物标志物的相关性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项非干预性、前瞻性的方向性地图样萎缩进展研究(Directional Spread in Geographic Atrophy)纳入了在德国波恩大学医院就诊的由 AMD 引起的地图样萎缩患者。参与者于 2013 年 6 月至 2016 年 6 月期间被招募。分析于 2019 年 12 月开始,2021 年 1 月结束。
使用 Radner 图表评估阅读视力和阅读速度。对眼底自发荧光和红外反射图像进行半自动注释,以确定地图样萎缩的位置,然后提取形状描述变量。采用线性混合效应模型来研究这些变量与阅读表现的相关性。
这项研究共纳入了 85 名患者的 150 只眼(中位数[四分位数间距]年龄,77.9[72.4-82.1]岁;51 名女性[60%];34 名男性[40%])。患者的阅读表现受损,其单眼阅读视力的中位数(四分位数间距)为 0.9(0.4-1.3)对数视力测定值,阅读速度为 52.8(0-123)个单词/分钟。在多变量横断面分析中,最佳矫正视力、中央早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)子域的地图样萎缩面积、非中心累及地图样萎缩与中心累及地图样萎缩的分类,以及内右 ETDRS 子域的地图样萎缩面积与阅读视力相关性最强(阅读视力的交叉验证 R2=0.69)。至于阅读速度,最相关的变量是最佳矫正视力、低亮度视力、中央 ETDRS 子域的地图样萎缩面积、内右 ETDRS 子域和内上 ETDRS 子域的地图样萎缩面积(阅读速度的 R2=0.67)。在纵向分析中,也确定了类似的阅读表现预测准确性(阅读视力的 R2=0.73;阅读速度的 R2=0.70)。当将随访时间作为一个独立变量添加时,预测准确性并没有提高。双眼阅读表现与优势眼的阅读表现没有差异。
阅读视力和速度与视觉功能和结构生物标志物的相关性支持了阅读表现作为临床试验中一个有意义的终点的有效性。这些发现表明,在临床和低视力护理中,对地图样萎缩患者的治疗应主要关注优势眼。