Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Nov;328:110996. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110996. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
The importance of RNA evidence is growing with new developments in RNA profiling methods and purposes. As forensic samples often can be of small quantity, extraction methods with high yields of both DNA and RNA are desirable. In order to identify the optimal DNA/RNA co-extraction workflow for forensic samples, we evaluated the performance of three frequently-used methods, two new approaches for DNA/RNA co-extraction and a manual phenol/chloroform RNA-only extraction method on blood and saliva samples. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the RNA and DNA quantities, as well as the STR genotyping and mRNA profiling results, we conclude that the two frequently-used co-extraction methods, combining commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits, achieved the best performance. However, not any combination of commercially available DNA and RNA extraction kits works well and extensive optimization is necessary, as seen in the poor results of the two new approaches.
随着 RNA 分析方法和目的的新发展,RNA 证据的重要性日益增加。由于法医样本通常数量较少,因此需要提取 DNA 和 RNA 产量高的提取方法。为了确定法医样本的最佳 DNA/RNA 联合提取工作流程,我们评估了三种常用方法、两种新的 DNA/RNA 联合提取方法和一种手动苯酚/氯仿 RNA 提取方法在血液和唾液样本中的性能。基于对 RNA 和 DNA 数量以及 STR 基因分型和 mRNA 分析结果的综合分析,我们得出结论,两种常用的联合提取方法,即结合市售 DNA 和 RNA 提取试剂盒,效果最佳。然而,并非任何市售 DNA 和 RNA 提取试剂盒的组合都能很好地发挥作用,需要进行广泛的优化,如两种新方法的结果较差所表明的那样。