Health and Safety Executive, Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire, United Kingdom.
Sheffield Hallam University, Materials and Engineering Research Institute, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Jun 6;66(5):644-655. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab081.
Exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is potentially hazardous to the health of thousands of workers in Great Britain. Both X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can be used to measure RCS to assess exposures. The current method outlined in the Health and Safety Executive's (HSE) Methods for the Determination of Hazardous Substances (MDHS) guidance series is 'MDHS 101 Crystalline silica in respirable airborne dust - Direct-on-filter analyses by infrared spectroscopy or x-ray'. This describes a procedure for the determination of time-weighted average concentrations of RCS either as quartz or cristobalite in airborne dust. FTIR is more commonly employed because it is less expensive, potentially portable and relatively easy to use. However, the FTIR analysis of RCS is affected by spectral interference from silicates. Chemometric techniques, known as Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and Principal Component Regression (PCR), are two computational processes that have the capability to remove spectral interference from FTIR spectra and correlate spectral features with constituent concentrations. These two common chemometric processes were tested on artificial mixtures of quartz and kaolinite in coal dust using the same commercially available software package. Calibration, validation and prediction samples were prepared by collecting aerosols of these dusts onto polyvinylchloride (PVC) filters using a Safety in Mines Personal Dust Sampler (SIMPEDS) respirable cyclone. PCR and PLSR analyses were compared when processing the same spectra. Good correlations between the target values, measured using XRD, were obtained for both the PCR and PLSR models e.g. 0.98-0.99 (quartz), 0.98-0.98 (kaolinite) and 0.96-0.97 (coal). The level of agreement between PCR and PLSR was within the 95% confidence value for each analyte. Slight differences observed between predicted PCR and PLSR values were due to the number of optimal principal components applied to each chemometric process. The presence of kaolinite in these samples caused an 18% overestimation of quartz, for the FTIR, when following MDHS 101 without a chemometric method. Chemometric methods are a useful approach to obtain interference-free results for the measurement of RCS from some workplace environments and to provide a multicomponent analysis to better characterise exposures of workers.
在英国,数以千计的工人接触可吸入结晶二氧化硅(RCS)可能对他们的健康造成危害。X 射线衍射(XRD)和傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱都可用于测量 RCS 以评估暴露情况。目前,健康与安全执行局(HSE)有害物质测定方法(MDHS)指南系列中概述的方法是“MDHS 101 可吸入空气中的结晶硅 - 红外光谱或 X 射线直接在滤纸上的分析”。这描述了一种测定空气中粉尘中 RCS (石英或方石英)时间加权平均浓度的方法。FTIR 更为常用,因为它更便宜、更便携且相对易于使用。然而,RCS 的 FTIR 分析受到来自硅酸盐的光谱干扰的影响。偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和主成分回归(PCR)等化学计量技术是两种具有从 FTIR 光谱中去除光谱干扰并将光谱特征与成分浓度相关联的计算过程。这两种常见的化学计量过程在使用相同的商业软件包对煤尘中的石英和高岭土的人工混合物进行了测试。使用矿山安全个人粉尘采样器(SIMPEDS)呼吸旋风收集这些粉尘的气溶胶,将校准、验证和预测样品收集到聚氯乙烯(PVC)滤纸上。当处理相同的光谱时,比较了 PCR 和 PLSR 分析。对于 XRD 测量的目标值,PCR 和 PLSR 模型都得到了很好的相关性,例如石英为 0.98-0.99、高岭土为 0.98-0.98 和煤为 0.96-0.97。每个分析物的 PCR 和 PLSR 之间的一致性在 95%置信值范围内。PCR 和 PLSR 预测值之间的细微差异是由于应用于每个化学计量过程的最佳主成分数量不同。在没有化学计量方法的情况下,按照 MDHS 101 对 FTIR 进行操作时,高岭土的存在会导致石英的 18%高估。化学计量方法是一种有用的方法,可以从某些工作场所环境中获得无干扰的 RCS 测量结果,并提供多组分分析以更好地描述工人的暴露情况。