Weakley Andrew T, Parks David A, Miller Arthur L
Department of Neurology, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
Office of Mine Safety and Health Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Spokane, Washington, USA.
Appl Spectrosc. 2025 Mar;79(3):364-375. doi: 10.1177/00037028241296158. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Respirable dust mass is a prevalent occupational health hazard to the mining workforce. Mineral matrices observed in the mine environment are complex, time varying, and heterogeneous. This poses a challenge to assessing dust exposure using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry as calibrations for constituent dust species (e.g., crystalline silica) have historically been trained using homogeneous standards or simple mixtures therein. Investigations have considered direct-on-filter analysis, which collects FT-IR spectra directly from sampling filters for calibration, as an alternative. Direct-on-filter analysis using a partial least squares (PLS) method has gained particular interest recently due to the potential to rapidly quantify multiple species from a single filter at the mine site. By design, heterogeneity, and its presumed impact on method accuracy, cannot be addressed in the laboratory when using a direct-on-filter approach motivating the need for more advanced calibration approaches. When heterogeneity is present, mixture of experts (MoE) finite mixture models offer a promising and novel alternative to PLS direct-on-filter analysis as MoE incorporates cluster discovery, regression, and outlier identification into model fitting. Three MoE models of increasing complexity were tasked with determining respirable dust mass in 243 field samples from thirteen active coal, limestone, sandstone, and silver mines. All MoE models, including those using only "expert" spectroscopic predictors or a combination of expert and categorical "gate" variables (e.g., mine type), significantly outperform PLS in terms of accuracy (α = 0.05). Decomposing bias by mine type shows that accuracy generally improves across all types considered when MoE models are not overfitted. The MoE method's effectiveness was linked to its ability to endogenously classify outliers as well as possibly to the use of an additional cluster model for mass predictions. Overall, MoE methods appear as a capable and novel tool to addressing problems of heterogeneity for direct-on-filter quantitative analysis.
可吸入粉尘团是采矿工人面临的一种普遍的职业健康危害。在矿山环境中观察到的矿物基质复杂、随时间变化且具有异质性。这给使用傅里叶变换红外(FT-IR)光谱法评估粉尘暴露带来了挑战,因为以往用于校准特定成分粉尘种类(如结晶二氧化硅)的方法是使用均匀标准物或其中的简单混合物进行训练的。研究考虑了直接在滤膜上进行分析,即将FT-IR光谱直接从采样滤膜收集用于校准,作为一种替代方法。由于能够在矿场现场从单个滤膜快速定量多种物质,使用偏最小二乘法(PLS)的直接在滤膜上进行分析最近受到了特别关注。从设计角度来看,当使用直接在滤膜上进行分析的方法时,异质性及其对方法准确性的假定影响在实验室中无法得到解决,这就促使需要更先进的校准方法。当存在异质性时,专家混合(MoE)有限混合模型为PLS直接在滤膜上进行分析提供了一种有前景的新颖替代方法,因为MoE将聚类发现、回归和异常值识别纳入到模型拟合中。三个复杂度不断增加的MoE模型被用于确定来自13个活跃煤矿、石灰石矿、砂岩矿和银矿的243个现场样本中的可吸入粉尘团。所有MoE模型,包括那些仅使用“专家”光谱预测变量或专家和分类 “门控” 变量(如矿山类型)组合的模型,在准确性方面(α = 0.05)都显著优于PLS。按矿山类型分解偏差表明,当MoE模型不过度拟合时,在所考虑的所有类型中准确性通常会提高。MoE方法的有效性与其将异常值内部分类的能力以及可能与使用额外的聚类模型进行质量预测有关。总体而言,MoE方法似乎是解决直接在滤膜上进行定量分析时异质性问题的一种有效且新颖的工具。