Belizário Brito Matheus, Chiozi Gotardi Gisele, Tosi Rodrigues Sérgio, Carvalho Cavalieri Beatriz, Nera Lima Diego, Lemes de Moraes Rodolfo, Scarparo Ferreira Livia, Augusto Barbieri Fabio, Angelo Barela José, Fávaro Polastri Paula
São Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Information, Vision and Action (LIVIA), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil; Post-graduation Program in Movement Sciences, São Paulo State University - UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil; Centro Universitário Sagrado Coração (UNISAGRADO), Department of Health Science, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
São Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences, Laboratory of Information, Vision and Action (LIVIA), Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil; Post-graduation Program in Movement Sciences, São Paulo State University - UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil.
Neurosci Lett. 2021 Nov 1;764:136276. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136276. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
This study investigated the modulation of center of pressure (CoP) displacements of young adults as they performed predictable and unpredictable saccadic eye movements in stationary and moving visual scenarios. We also examined whether the relationship between CoP displacements and visual stimulus, provided by the moving scenario, and gaze control itself, are affected by the demands of the saccadic tasks. Fifteen young adults (20.53 ± 2.1 years old) stood upright on a force plate, inside a moving room, wearing an eye tracker while performing three tasks: gaze fixation (fixating on a target in the center of the screen), predictable task (saccades while following a target which continuously appeared and disappeared on the right and left sides), and unpredictable task (similar to the previous task, but the participants did not know which side the target would appear on). For saccadic tasks, the target appeared at a frequency of 1.1 Hz and with eccentricity of 11.5 degrees of visual angle. Two blocks of six trials were performed: in the first block, the room remained stationary and in the second, it oscillated (0.6 cm amplitude; 0.2 Hz frequency). Mean amplitude of CoP displacements was lower in the saccadic tasks compared to the gaze fixation, in both conditions; and higher in the moving scenario than in the stationary condition. Variability of CoP displacements was lower in the unpredictable saccades than gaze fixation task. Saccade reaction time was longer in the unpredictable than predictable task. We conclude that CoP displacements are reduced to facilitate performance of the saccadic tasks regardless of conditions and task complexity. Furthermore, lower variability suggests modulation of CoP displacements to deal with the increased attentional demands associated with the performance of the unpredictable saccades, indicating the important role of visual task constraints in postural control.
本研究调查了年轻人在静止和移动视觉场景中进行可预测和不可预测的眼球跳动时,其压力中心(CoP)位移的调节情况。我们还研究了由移动场景提供的CoP位移与视觉刺激以及注视控制本身之间的关系,是否会受到眼球跳动任务要求的影响。15名年轻人(20.53±2.1岁)站在移动室内的测力板上,佩戴眼动仪,同时执行三项任务:注视(注视屏幕中央的目标)、可预测任务(跟随在左右两侧连续出现和消失的目标进行眼球跳动)和不可预测任务(与前一任务类似,但参与者不知道目标会出现在哪一侧)。对于眼球跳动任务,目标以1.1Hz的频率出现,视角偏心率为11.5度。进行了两个包含六次试验的组块:在第一个组块中,房间保持静止,在第二个组块中,房间振荡(振幅0.6cm;频率0.2Hz)。在两种情况下,眼球跳动任务中CoP位移的平均幅度均低于注视任务;并且在移动场景中高于静止状态。不可预测眼球跳动时CoP位移的变异性低于注视任务。不可预测任务中的眼球跳动反应时间比可预测任务更长。我们得出结论,无论条件和任务复杂性如何,CoP位移都会减少以促进眼球跳动任务的执行。此外,较低的变异性表明对CoP位移进行了调节,以应对与不可预测眼球跳动执行相关的注意力需求增加,这表明视觉任务约束在姿势控制中起着重要作用。