Miles D A, McDavid W D, Welander U, Hockett S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986 Jul;62(1):92-5. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(86)90078-2.
Most comparisons between dental radiographs and dental xeroradiographs to date have been qualitative. Because the processing techniques and receptor materials are so dissimilar, a simple, objective comparison has been difficult. This report outlines a quantitative comparison technique that is easily reproduced.
迄今为止,大多数牙科X光片和牙科干板X线片之间的比较都是定性的。由于处理技术和感受器材料差异很大,进行简单、客观的比较一直很困难。本报告概述了一种易于重复的定量比较技术。