Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Lynchburg, Hobbs Hall, 1501 Lakeside Drive, Lynchburg, VA, 24501, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, 132 Long Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Zoology (Jena). 2021 Dec;149:125969. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2021.125969. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
Waterfall-climbing gobiids from oceanic islands use a suction-based adhesive mechanism formed by fused pelvic fins (pelvic sucker) and exhibit rock-climbing behavior during upstream migration. Although adhesion is a common feature of locomotion in these fishes, two distinct climbing styles - powerburst climbing and inching - have evolved. We compared the performance of the pelvic sucker during climbing across a range of body sizes between two species that use these different styles, collecting new data from the powerburst climber Lentipes concolor, and comparing these to published data for the inching climber Sicyopterus japonicus. Suction force for adhesion generated during continuous climbing did not differ between the species, with similar mean safety factors of 2.5-3.0. However, L. concolor engaged its pelvic sucker for a significantly longer duration of time (approximately 34 % longer per climbing cycle) than S. japonicus during continuous climbing. During sustained adhesion, both species exhibited non-linear scaling of fatigue time, with intermediate-sized individuals (e.g., large juveniles to small adults) showing the greatest endurance. However, the two species exhibited strikingly different maxima and variability in the endurance of their pelvic suckers. Maximum time to fatigue in L. concolor was less than half that of S. japonicus, but L. concolor showed more than double the variability of S. japonicus in time to fatigue. Our comparisons of these species reveal that despite differences in several aspects of their adhesive performance, some features of sucker function remain similar across climbing styles, including several related to how performance changes through ontogeny.
来自海洋岛屿的瀑布攀爬虾虎鱼利用融合的腹鳍形成基于吸力的粘附机制(腹吸盘),并在向上游迁移过程中表现出攀岩行为。尽管粘附是这些鱼类运动的共同特征,但已经进化出两种不同的攀爬风格——爆发式攀爬和渐进式攀爬。我们比较了两种使用不同风格的物种在一系列体型范围内腹吸盘在攀爬过程中的性能,从爆发式攀爬者 Lentipes concolor 收集了新的数据,并将这些数据与渐进式攀爬者 Sicyopterus japonicus 的已发表数据进行了比较。在连续攀爬过程中,粘附产生的吸力因物种而异,相似的平均安全系数为 2.5-3.0。然而,L. concolor 在连续攀爬过程中,其腹吸盘的使用时间比 S. japonicus 长约 34%(每个攀爬周期长约 34%)。在持续粘附期间,两个物种的疲劳时间都表现出非线性缩放,中等体型的个体(例如,大型幼鱼到小型成鱼)表现出最大的耐力。然而,这两个物种在其腹吸盘的耐力最大值和可变性方面表现出明显的差异。L. concolor 的疲劳时间最大值不到 S. japonicus 的一半,但 L. concolor 的疲劳时间可变性是 S. japonicus 的两倍多。我们对这些物种的比较表明,尽管它们在粘附性能的几个方面存在差异,但吸盘功能的某些特征在攀爬风格之间仍然相似,包括与性能如何随个体发育而变化有关的几个特征。