Lubián López Daniel María, Butrón Hinojo Carmen Aisha, Sánchez-Prieto Manuel, Mendoza Nicolás, Sánchez-Borrego Rafael
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.
Hospital Quirón Salud Campo de Gibraltar, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Aug;16(4):376-382. doi: 10.1159/000510079. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether postmenopausal women with breast cancer (BC) on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy have a higher prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Second, the aim was to determine the quality of life (QoL) and level of anxiety depending on whether or not they are AI users.
A prospective cross-sectional study involving 168 patients was performed. Three questionnaires were carried out: sexual functioning was evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), while the EORTC QLQ-BR23 measures to study QoL in patients with BC and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire (trait and status) were used to assess anxiety status in patients under treatment with AIs or not.
47.6% (80/168) of the postmenopausal BC survivors were not sexually active (mean time after surgery: 48.6 months) despite a relatively low mean age (56.43 years). Postmenopausal AI-treated women had significantly worse sexual function as measured by the FSFI (23.40 ± 5.26 vs. 30.16 ± 2.24; = 0.000). There were significant differences between both groups in all domains, except orgasm. The QoL score was 37.67 ± 7.38 in AI users versus 39.00 ± 1.44 among nonusers ( = 0.053). Patients under endocrine treatment also presented STAI scores significantly higher (25.83 ± 4.99 vs. 19.00 ± 7.12; = 0.000). Trait anxiety was high in both groups, but this was not statistically significant.
We observed a high prevalence of sexual inactivity among BC survivors regardless of AI use. Patients with AI use presented significantly higher prevalence of FSD, worse QoL, and greater anxiety.
本研究的目的是调查接受辅助芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)治疗的绝经后乳腺癌(BC)女性性功能障碍(FSD)的患病率是否更高。其次,目的是根据她们是否使用AI来确定生活质量(QoL)和焦虑水平。
进行了一项涉及168名患者的前瞻性横断面研究。开展了三份问卷:使用女性性功能指数(FSFI)评估性功能,而欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷BC23(EORTC QLQ - BR23)用于研究BC患者的QoL,状态 - 特质焦虑量表(STAI)问卷(特质和状态)用于评估接受或未接受AI治疗患者的焦虑状态。
尽管平均年龄相对较低(56.43岁),但47.6%(80/168)的绝经后BC幸存者没有性活动(手术后平均时间:48.6个月)。通过FSFI测量,绝经后接受AI治疗的女性性功能明显更差(23.40±5.26对30.16±2.24;P = 0.000)。除性高潮外,两组在所有领域均存在显著差异。AI使用者的QoL评分为37.67±7.38,非使用者为39.00±1.44(P = 0.053)。接受内分泌治疗的患者STAI评分也显著更高(25.83±4.99对19.00±7.12;P = 0.000)。两组的特质焦虑都很高,但这在统计学上并不显著。
我们观察到无论是否使用AI,BC幸存者中性活动不活跃的患病率都很高。使用AI的患者FSD患病率显著更高,QoL更差,焦虑程度更高。