瑞戈非尼联合托瑞米芬在晚期结直肠癌三线及以上治疗中的疗效和安全性

Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib Combined with Toripalimab in the Third-Line and beyond Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Yu Wei, Tao Qiaomeng, Zhang Yufeng, Yi Fengming, Feng Long

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.

JiangXi Key Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Cancer Research, Nanchang 330006, China.

出版信息

J Oncol. 2021 Sep 24;2021:9959946. doi: 10.1155/2021/9959946. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most effective treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is restricted in microsatellite instability (MSI-H) subsets of advanced colorectal cancer, but MSI-H only accounts for 4-5% among them. ICIs are completely ineffective in advanced colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), according to literatures published. Regorafenib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs) that could normalize tumor blood vessels by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and its downstream, thus improving cytotoxic T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment, which has a synergistic effect with ICIs. Toripalimab is a type of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody produced by Junshi Biosciences in China. Herein, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated the outcomes of MSS patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received regorafenib combined with toripalimab in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2019 to January 2021. These patients had previously received at least second-line treatment; the regimens were oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or accompanied with bevacizumab or cetuximab. Thirty-three patients were treated orally with regorafenib 80 mg or 120 mg once daily for 21 days, 28 days as a cycle, combined with intravenous toripalimab until disease progression or intolerant to adverse reactions. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the rate of progression-free survival (PFS) and log-rank method to do a statistical test of the survival curve. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the influence of multiple factors on PFS. The primary endpoints were objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The secondary endpoints were the incidence of adverse reactions and median progression-free survival (mPFS).

RESULTS

The evaluation of treatment effects was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Four patients (12.12%) got partial response, twelve patients (36.36%) experienced stable disease, and seventeen patients (51.52%) suffered progressive disease. ORR was 12.12% and DCR was 48.48%. mPFS was 113 days (95% CI: 0-272.1). In univariate analysis, patients who had previously received second-line treatment were significantly better than those who had received third-line or more treatment (=0.005). Lung metastasis was a negative factor in combined therapy (=0.032). Five patients without previous treatment of bevacizumab were effective. Previous treatment without bevacizumab showed a trend of effective when combination therapy (=0.034). It was also a positive factor that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG) score was 0 (=0.034). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the number of previous chemotherapy lines and excision of primary lesions were independent prognostic factors. The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were hand-foot syndrome (33.33%), liver dysfunction (27.27), hypothyroidism (24.24%), fever (24.24%), fatigue (21.21%), leukopenia (15.15%), hypertension (12.12%), platelet count decreased (6.06%), diarrhea (3.03%), and myocarditis (3.03%); one patient stopped treatment as myocarditis. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions was 9.09%.

CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib combined with toripalimab has a promising effect in the third-line and beyond treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In the early use of combination therapy, excision of primary lesions can have a positive impact in regorafenib and toripalimab combination. This treatment-related adverse reactions are tolerant in combined therapy.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的最有效治疗局限于晚期结直肠癌的微卫星高度不稳定(MSI-H)亚组,但MSI-H在其中仅占4%-5%。根据已发表的文献,ICIs在微卫星稳定(MSS)的晚期结直肠癌患者中完全无效。瑞戈非尼是一种新型酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs),可通过抑制血管内皮生长因子受体及其下游分子使肿瘤血管正常化,从而改善肿瘤微环境中细胞毒性T细胞浸润,与ICIs具有协同作用。托瑞帕利单抗是中国君实生物生产的一种抗PD-1单克隆抗体。在此,我们旨在探索瑞戈非尼联合托瑞帕利单抗用于晚期结直肠癌三线及以上治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们评估了2019年6月至2021年1月在南昌大学第二附属医院接受瑞戈非尼联合托瑞帕利单抗治疗的MSS晚期结直肠癌患者的治疗结果。这些患者此前至少接受过二线治疗;治疗方案是以奥沙利铂和伊立替康为基础的化疗和/或联合贝伐单抗或西妥昔单抗。33例患者口服瑞戈非尼80mg或120mg,每日1次,共21天,28天为1个周期,联合静脉注射托瑞帕利单抗,直至疾病进展或不耐受不良反应。我们采用Kaplan-Meier法估计无进展生存期(PFS)率,并用log-rank法对生存曲线进行统计学检验。采用Cox回归模型分析多因素对PFS的影响。主要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。次要终点为不良反应发生率和中位无进展生存期(mPFS)。

结果

根据RECIST 1.1评估治疗效果。4例患者(12.12%)获得部分缓解,12例患者(36.36%)病情稳定,17例患者(51.52%)病情进展。ORR为12.12%,DCR为48.48%。mPFS为113天(95%CI:0-272.1)。单因素分析中,既往接受二线治疗的患者明显优于接受三线及以上治疗的患者(P=0.005)。肺转移是联合治疗的负面因素(P=0.032)。5例既往未接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者治疗有效。联合治疗时,既往未接受贝伐单抗治疗显示出有效的趋势(P=0.034)。东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分为0也是一个积极因素(P=0.034)。多变量Cox回归分析显示,既往化疗线数和原发灶切除是独立的预后因素。最常见的治疗相关不良反应为手足综合征(33.33%)、肝功能障碍(27.27%)、甲状腺功能减退(24.24%)、发热(24.24%)、疲劳(21.21%)、白细胞减少(15.15%)、高血压(12.12%)及血小板计数降低(6.06%)、腹泻(3.03%)和心肌炎(3.03%);1例患者因心肌炎停止治疗。3/4级不良反应发生率为9.09%。

结论

瑞戈非尼联合托瑞帕利单抗用于晚期结直肠癌三线及以上治疗有良好疗效。在联合治疗早期应用时,切除原发灶对瑞戈非尼和托瑞帕利单抗联合治疗有积极影响。这种联合治疗相关不良反应耐受性良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22a/8486501/34cb73293534/JO2021-9959946.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索