Cai Hong, Wang Shuo, Zou Runmei, Liu Ping, Li Fang, Wang Yuwen, Wang Cheng
Department of Pediatric Cardiovasology, Children's Medical Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Department of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 17;9:691390. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.691390. eCollection 2021.
We aimed to compare the hemodynamic responses to the active sitting test with the passive head-up tilt test (HUTT) in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We hypothesized that sitting tachycardia was also present in POTS patients during sitting. We tested 30 POTS patients and 31 control subjects (mean age = 12 years, range = 9-16 years) who underwent both active sitting test and HUTT successively. We measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) during each test. For both POTS patients and control subjects, the HUTT produced significantly larger HR and BP increases from 3 to 10 min of postural change than did the sitting test. Moreover, POTS patients with excessive orthostatic tachycardia during the HUTT also had significantly larger increases in HR at all test intervals during the sitting test than did the control subjects. A maximum increase in HR ≥ 22 bpm within 10 min of the sitting test was likely suggested to predict orthostatic tachycardia, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3 and 83.9%, respectively. Only six of 30 POTS patients (20%) reached the 40-bpm criterion during the sitting test, and no one complained of sitting intolerance symptoms. We have shown that POTS patients also have sitting tachycardia when changing from a supine position to a sitting position. We believe that the active sitting test is a reasonable alternative maneuver in assessing POTS in population groups that cannot tolerate the standing test or HUTT.
我们旨在比较姿势性心动过速综合征(POTS)患儿及青少年在主动坐位试验和被动头高位倾斜试验(HUTT)中的血流动力学反应。我们假设POTS患者在坐位时也存在坐位心动过速。我们对30例POTS患者和31名对照受试者(平均年龄 = 12岁,范围 = 9 - 16岁)进行了研究,这些受试者先后接受了主动坐位试验和HUTT。我们在每次试验期间测量心率(HR)和血压(BP)。对于POTS患者和对照受试者,与坐位试验相比,HUTT在姿势改变后3至10分钟内使HR和BP升高幅度更大。此外,在HUTT期间出现过度直立性心动过速的POTS患者在坐位试验的所有测试间隔内HR升高幅度也显著大于对照受试者。坐位试验10分钟内心率最大升高≥22次/分钟可能提示直立性心动过速,敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和83.9%。30例POTS患者中只有6例(20%)在坐位试验期间达到40次/分钟的标准,且无人主诉坐位不耐受症状。我们已经表明,POTS患者从仰卧位变为坐位时也存在坐位心动过速。我们认为,主动坐位试验是评估无法耐受站立试验或HUTT的人群中POTS的一种合理替代方法。