Suppr超能文献

主动坐位试验与头高位倾斜试验在儿童和青少年姿势性心动过速综合征诊断中的比较

Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents.

作者信息

Cai Hong, Wang Shuo, Zou Runmei, Liu Ping, Li Fang, Wang Yuwen, Wang Cheng

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Cardiovasology, Children's Medical Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Department of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 17;9:691390. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.691390. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

We aimed to compare the hemodynamic responses to the active sitting test with the passive head-up tilt test (HUTT) in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We hypothesized that sitting tachycardia was also present in POTS patients during sitting. We tested 30 POTS patients and 31 control subjects (mean age = 12 years, range = 9-16 years) who underwent both active sitting test and HUTT successively. We measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) during each test. For both POTS patients and control subjects, the HUTT produced significantly larger HR and BP increases from 3 to 10 min of postural change than did the sitting test. Moreover, POTS patients with excessive orthostatic tachycardia during the HUTT also had significantly larger increases in HR at all test intervals during the sitting test than did the control subjects. A maximum increase in HR ≥ 22 bpm within 10 min of the sitting test was likely suggested to predict orthostatic tachycardia, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3 and 83.9%, respectively. Only six of 30 POTS patients (20%) reached the 40-bpm criterion during the sitting test, and no one complained of sitting intolerance symptoms. We have shown that POTS patients also have sitting tachycardia when changing from a supine position to a sitting position. We believe that the active sitting test is a reasonable alternative maneuver in assessing POTS in population groups that cannot tolerate the standing test or HUTT.

摘要

我们旨在比较姿势性心动过速综合征(POTS)患儿及青少年在主动坐位试验和被动头高位倾斜试验(HUTT)中的血流动力学反应。我们假设POTS患者在坐位时也存在坐位心动过速。我们对30例POTS患者和31名对照受试者(平均年龄 = 12岁,范围 = 9 - 16岁)进行了研究,这些受试者先后接受了主动坐位试验和HUTT。我们在每次试验期间测量心率(HR)和血压(BP)。对于POTS患者和对照受试者,与坐位试验相比,HUTT在姿势改变后3至10分钟内使HR和BP升高幅度更大。此外,在HUTT期间出现过度直立性心动过速的POTS患者在坐位试验的所有测试间隔内HR升高幅度也显著大于对照受试者。坐位试验10分钟内心率最大升高≥22次/分钟可能提示直立性心动过速,敏感性和特异性分别为83.3%和83.9%。30例POTS患者中只有6例(20%)在坐位试验期间达到40次/分钟的标准,且无人主诉坐位不耐受症状。我们已经表明,POTS患者从仰卧位变为坐位时也存在坐位心动过速。我们认为,主动坐位试验是评估无法耐受站立试验或HUTT的人群中POTS的一种合理替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/8485704/1746b72974d8/fped-09-691390-g0001.jpg

相似文献

3
[Coefficient of variation of heart rate and blood pressure in rapid identification of children with suspected orthostatic intolerance].
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 2;60(1):25-29. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20211008-00851.
9
Hemodynamic profile and heart rate variability in hyperadrenergic versus non-hyperadrenergic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1639-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
10
The preponderance of initial orthostatic hypotension in postural tachycardia syndrome.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Sep 1;129(3):459-466. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00540.2020. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Standing under pressure: hemodynamic effects of abdominal compression type and intensity in healthy adults.
Front Physiol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1621617. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1621617. eCollection 2025.
2
Cardiovascular Response to Active Standing Test in Children with Overweight and Obesity.
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2025 May 2;60(3):268-273. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24243.
3
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neurally mediated syncope in children and adolescents (revised 2024).
World J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;20(10):983-1002. doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00819-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Effects of posture changes on dynamic cerebral autoregulation during early pregnancy in women with obesity and/or sleep apnea.
Clin Auton Res. 2023 Apr;33(2):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s10286-023-00939-9. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
[A 10-year retrospective analysis of spectrums and treatment options of orthostatic intolerance and sitting intolerance in children].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 18;54(5):954-960. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.05.024.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 Chinese Pediatric Cardiology Society (CPCS) guideline for diagnosis and treatment of syncope in children and adolescents.
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2018 Dec 15;63(23):1558-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: Pathophysiology and Clinical Management.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Aug 20;8:474. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00474. eCollection 2020.
5
Management of orthostatic intolerance in children: the state of the art.
World J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;16(6):543-548. doi: 10.1007/s12519-019-00329-0. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
6
Acute onset and severe manifestation of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome - Two cases.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Jan;131(1):158-159. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Sex differences in heart rate responses to postural provocations.
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;297:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.044. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: Mechanisms and New Therapies.
Annu Rev Med. 2020 Jan 27;71:235-248. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-041818-011630. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
The face of postural tachycardia syndrome - insights from a large cross-sectional online community-based survey.
J Intern Med. 2019 Oct;286(4):438-448. doi: 10.1111/joim.12895. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Autonomic uprising: the tilt table test in autonomic medicine.
Clin Auton Res. 2019 Apr;29(2):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s10286-019-00598-9. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验