Suppr超能文献

加巴喷丁对治疗女性慢性盆腔疼痛具有长期疗效:一项系统评价和初步荟萃分析。

Gabapentin has Longer-Term Efficacy for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Pilot Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fan Xiu-Mei, Ren Yi-Feng, Fu Xi, Wu Hao, Ye Xin, Jiang Yi-Fang, You Feng-Ming

机构信息

Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China.

TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 39 Shi-er-qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1673-1689. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00330-4. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Gabapentin has potential analgesic benefits in patients with neuropathic pain, such as post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic peripheral neuropathy neuropathic pain. However, its efficacy in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) remains contradictory. In the present study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to ascertain the efficacy of this treatment.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed RCTs published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, up to July 2021. These articles compared gabapentin with placebo or any other active treatment for CPP in women, with 'the change in pain scores from the baseline during the first 3 and 6 months of treatment' taken as the primary outcome. We considered reductions equivalent to 1.0 cm for primary outcomes to be clinically important.

RESULTS

Four studies, comprising 469 participants, were included in our meta-analysis. Results revealed that the gabapentin group had significantly higher change in pain intensity scores from baseline to 3 months [weighted mean difference (WMD) - 0.61 cm; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.97 to - 0.25; I = 0%; p = 0.0009] and 6 months (WMD - 1.38 cm; 95% CI - 1.89 to - 0.88; I = 0%; p < 0.00001), relative to the control group. The difference of 6-month pooled result was more clinically important. Results from analysis of secondary outcomes showed that gabapentin had no beneficial efficacy during the first 3 months of treatment. Although gabapentin treatment was associated with a higher risk of dizziness and somnolence, no statistically significant differences were observed with regards to the total incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, gabapentin could be a potential treatment option for CPP in women. However, as a pilot study, further studies are needed to explore the longer-term benefits and definite safety of this therapy in the future.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO registration number CRD42021249421.

摘要

引言

加巴喷丁对患有神经性疼痛的患者具有潜在的镇痛益处,如带状疱疹后神经痛和糖尿病性周围神经病变性疼痛。然而,其对慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)女性患者的疗效仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定这种治疗方法的疗效。

方法

我们系统检索了截至2021年7月在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和谷歌学术数据库中发表的RCT。这些文章将加巴喷丁与安慰剂或其他治疗CPP女性患者的活性治疗进行了比较,将“治疗前3个月和6个月期间疼痛评分相对于基线的变化”作为主要结局。我们认为主要结局相当于1.0 cm的降低具有临床意义。

结果

四项研究共469名参与者纳入我们的荟萃分析。结果显示,与对照组相比,加巴喷丁组从基线到3个月的疼痛强度评分变化显著更高[加权平均差(WMD)-0.61 cm;95%置信区间(CI)-0.97至-0.25;I² = 0%;p = 0.0009],到6个月时也是如此(WMD -1.38 cm;95% CI -1.89至-0.88;I² = 0%;p < 0.00001)。6个月汇总结果的差异在临床上更具重要意义。次要结局分析结果显示,加巴喷丁在治疗的前3个月没有有益疗效。虽然加巴喷丁治疗与头晕和嗜睡的较高风险相关,但在不良事件总发生率方面未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

总体而言,加巴喷丁可能是CPP女性患者的一种潜在治疗选择。然而,作为一项初步研究,未来需要进一步研究来探索这种治疗方法的长期益处和确切安全性。

注册号

PROSPERO注册号CRD42021249421。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aad/8586286/133f78f4c1f2/40122_2021_330_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验