Faculty of Medicine, Research in Education, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC, Amstel Academy, Institute for Education and Training, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02939-7.
To prepare nursing students to become critical, autonomous members of the workforce, an agreement among stakeholders on how this can be achieved in the clinical setting is needed. However, a critical discussion of the clinical learning process in relation to actual and desirable outcomes is lacking in the nursing education literature. This study aimed to map conceptions of the desired process and outcomes of clinical learning among stakeholders involved in undergraduate clinical nursing education.
Twenty-five semi-structured interviews about their understanding of clinical learning were conducted with nursing students, supervisors, clinical educators and higher education institute professionals involved in clinical nursing education in a Dutch academic medical center. Data were analyzed using a phenomenographic approach.
Four conceptions were identified: clinical learning as a process to 1) meet curricular demands, 2) learn to deliberately deliver patient care, 3) learn to deliver patient care within the larger (healthcare) context, and 4) become a continuously developing professional. Conceptions 3 and 4 represented a broader, more inclusive perspective on clinical learning than conception 1 and 2. Conceptions were distinguished by five dimensions: role of guidelines from the school; learning opportunities, focus of supervisor; focus of reflection; desirable outcomes of clinical learning.
Those directly involved in clinical learning in nursing may have qualitatively different understandings of its desired nature and outcomes. Two patterns across conceptions could be discerned: a) a shift in focus from learning as following standards, to following an individualized learning trajectory and b) a shift in focus from increasing patient load, to understanding oneself and the patient within the healthcare context. To prepare nursing students for the future workforce, a flexible, social form of self-regulated learning is warranted, as well as an understanding of one's own role within the healthcare system and a critical attitude towards healthcare. Schools and hospitals should collaborate to integrate these values in the curriculum. The current study adds different ways of applying self-regulated learning as a relevant dimension in understanding clinical learning to the literature. Through the phenomenographic approach we identified conceptions that can be a basis for training and policy development.
为了使护理学生成为具有批判能力、自主的劳动力,需要利益相关者就如何在临床环境中实现这一目标达成一致。然而,护理教育文献中缺乏对与实际和期望结果相关的临床学习过程的批判性讨论。本研究旨在描绘参与本科临床护理教育的利益相关者对临床学习过程和结果的期望。
在荷兰学术医疗中心,对 25 名参与临床护理教育的护理学生、主管、临床教育工作者和高等教育机构专业人员进行了 25 次关于他们对临床学习理解的半结构化访谈。使用现象学方法对数据进行分析。
确定了四种观念:临床学习是一个过程,可用于 1)满足课程要求,2)学习有目的的提供患者护理,3)在更大的(医疗保健)背景下学习提供患者护理,以及 4)成为不断发展的专业人员。观念 3 和 4 代表了比观念 1 和 2 更广泛、更具包容性的临床学习观点。观念通过五个维度来区分:学校的指导方针的作用;学习机会、主管的关注点;反思的焦点;临床学习的理想结果。
那些直接参与护理临床学习的人可能对其性质和结果有不同的理解。可以从观念中看出两种模式:a)从关注按照标准学习转变为关注遵循个性化学习轨迹,b)从关注增加患者负担转变为在医疗保健背景下理解自己和患者。为了使护理学生为未来的劳动力做好准备,需要灵活的、社交形式的自我调节学习,以及对自己在医疗保健系统中的角色的理解和对医疗保健的批判态度。学校和医院应该合作,将这些价值观纳入课程。本研究将自我调节学习作为理解临床学习的一个相关维度,为文献增添了不同的应用方式。通过现象学方法,我们确定了可以作为培训和政策制定基础的观念。