Suppr超能文献

比较一般和肝脏特异性预后评分在预测 ICU 收治肝硬化患者死亡率方面的能力。

Comparison of General and Liver-Specific Prognostic Scores in Their Ability to Predict Mortality in Cirrhotic Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

机构信息

Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (EBMSP), Salvador, Brazil.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Hospital Português (HP), Salvador, Brazil.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep 24;2021:9953106. doi: 10.1155/2021/9953106. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and III and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) are prognostic scores commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU). Their accuracy in predicting mortality has not been adequately evaluated in comparison to prognostic scores commonly used in critically ill cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation (AD) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

AIMS

This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of prognostic scores, including APACHE II, SOFA, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF-C) SOFA, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CPS), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Na, MELD to serum sodium ratio (MESO) index, CLIF-C organ failure (CLIF-C OF), CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD scores, in predicting mortality of cirrhotic patients admitted to the ICU. . A total of 382 patients (280 males, mean age 67.3 ± 10.6 years) with cirrhosis were retrospectively evaluated. All prognostic scores were calculated in the first 24 hours of ICU admission. Their ability to predict mortality was measured using the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Mortality was observed in 31% of the patients. Analysis of AUC revealed that CLIF-C OF (0.807) and CLIF-SOFA (0.776) had the best ability to predict mortality in all patients, but CLIF-C OF (0.749) had higher prognostic accuracy in patients with ACLF. CLIF-SOFA, SOFA, and CLIF-C AD had the highest AUC values in patients with AD, with no statistical difference (=0.971).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to other general or liver-specific prognostic scores, CLIF-C OF, CLIF-SOFA, SOFA, and CLIF-C AD have good accuracy to predict mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis and patients with AD. According to the clinical scenario, different scores should be used to provide prognosis to patients with cirrhosis in the ICU.

摘要

介绍

急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II 和 III 以及序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)是重症监护病房(ICU)中常用的预后评分。然而,它们在预测死亡率方面的准确性尚未与常用于急性失代偿(AD)或慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)的危重肝硬化患者的预后评分进行充分比较。

目的

本研究旨在评估预后评分,包括 APACHE II、SOFA、慢性肝衰竭联盟(CLIF-C)SOFA、Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CPS)、终末期肝病模型(MELD)、MELD-Na、MELD 与血清钠比值(MESO)指数、CLIF-C 器官衰竭(CLIF-C OF)、CLIF-C ACLF 和 CLIF-C AD 评分,在预测 ICU 收治的肝硬化患者死亡率方面的表现。共回顾性评估了 382 例(280 名男性,平均年龄 67.3±10.6 岁)肝硬化患者。所有预后评分均在 ICU 入院后 24 小时内计算。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分析来衡量它们预测死亡率的能力。

结果

31%的患者死亡。AUC 分析显示,在所有患者中,CLIF-C OF(0.807)和 CLIF-SOFA(0.776)具有预测死亡率的最佳能力,但在 ACLF 患者中,CLIF-C OF(0.749)具有更高的预后准确性。CLIF-SOFA、SOFA 和 CLIF-C AD 在 AD 患者中具有最高的 AUC 值,无统计学差异(=0.971)。

结论

与其他一般或肝脏特异性预后评分相比,CLIF-C OF、CLIF-SOFA、SOFA 和 CLIF-C AD 在预测肝硬化危重症患者和 AD 患者死亡率方面具有良好的准确性。根据临床情况,应使用不同的评分来为 ICU 中的肝硬化患者提供预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ef/8487366/7c1e85fcffc9/CJGH2021-9953106.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验