Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
The Wilson Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):319-326. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00686-5. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
Theory plays an important role in education programming and research. However, its use in quality improvement and patient safety education has yet to be fully characterized. The authors undertook a scoping review to examine the use of theory in quality improvement and patient safety education.
Eligible articles used theory to inform the design or study of a quality improvement or patient safety curriculum. The authors followed scoping review methodology and searched articles referenced in 20 systematic reviews of quality improvement and patient safety education, or articles citing one of these reviews, and hand searched eligible article references. Data analysis involved descriptive and interpretive summaries of theories used and the perspectives the theories offered.
Eligibility criteria were met by 28 articles, and 102 articles made superficial mention of theory. Eligible articles varied in professional group, learning stage and journal type. Theories fell into two broad categories: learning theories (n = 20) and social science theories (n = 11). Theory was used in the design (n = 12) or study (n = 17) of quality improvement and patient safety education. The range of theories shows the opportunity afforded by using more than one type of theory.
Theory can guide decisions regarding quality improvement and patient safety education practices or play a role in selecting a methodology or lens through which to study educational processes and outcomes. Educators and researchers should make deliberate choices around the use of theory that relates to aspects of an educational program that they seek to illuminate.
理论在教育规划和研究中起着重要作用。然而,其在质量改进和患者安全教育中的应用尚未得到充分描述。作者进行了范围综述,以考察理论在质量改进和患者安全教育中的应用。
符合条件的文章使用理论来为质量改进或患者安全课程的设计或研究提供信息。作者遵循范围综述方法,检索了 20 篇质量改进和患者安全教育系统评价中引用的文章或引用这些综述的文章,并对符合条件的文章参考文献进行了手工检索。数据分析包括对使用的理论和理论提供的观点进行描述性和解释性总结。
28 篇文章符合资格标准,102 篇文章仅简单提及理论。符合条件的文章在专业群体、学习阶段和期刊类型上存在差异。理论分为两大类:学习理论(n=20)和社会科学理论(n=11)。理论用于质量改进和患者安全教育的设计(n=12)或研究(n=17)。理论的范围表明,使用多种类型的理论提供了机会。
理论可以指导质量改进和患者安全教育实践的决策,或者在选择研究教育过程和结果的方法或视角方面发挥作用。教育者和研究人员应该围绕理论的使用做出深思熟虑的选择,这些选择与他们试图阐明的教育计划的各个方面相关。