Suppr超能文献

质量改进和患者安全教育理论:范围综述。

Theory in quality improvement and patient safety education: A scoping review.

机构信息

Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

The Wilson Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):319-326. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00686-5. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Theory plays an important role in education programming and research. However, its use in quality improvement and patient safety education has yet to be fully characterized. The authors undertook a scoping review to examine the use of theory in quality improvement and patient safety education.

METHODS

Eligible articles used theory to inform the design or study of a quality improvement or patient safety curriculum. The authors followed scoping review methodology and searched articles referenced in 20 systematic reviews of quality improvement and patient safety education, or articles citing one of these reviews, and hand searched eligible article references. Data analysis involved descriptive and interpretive summaries of theories used and the perspectives the theories offered.

RESULTS

Eligibility criteria were met by 28 articles, and 102 articles made superficial mention of theory. Eligible articles varied in professional group, learning stage and journal type. Theories fell into two broad categories: learning theories (n = 20) and social science theories (n = 11). Theory was used in the design (n = 12) or study (n = 17) of quality improvement and patient safety education. The range of theories shows the opportunity afforded by using more than one type of theory.

DISCUSSION

Theory can guide decisions regarding quality improvement and patient safety education practices or play a role in selecting a methodology or lens through which to study educational processes and outcomes. Educators and researchers should make deliberate choices around the use of theory that relates to aspects of an educational program that they seek to illuminate.

摘要

简介

理论在教育规划和研究中起着重要作用。然而,其在质量改进和患者安全教育中的应用尚未得到充分描述。作者进行了范围综述,以考察理论在质量改进和患者安全教育中的应用。

方法

符合条件的文章使用理论来为质量改进或患者安全课程的设计或研究提供信息。作者遵循范围综述方法,检索了 20 篇质量改进和患者安全教育系统评价中引用的文章或引用这些综述的文章,并对符合条件的文章参考文献进行了手工检索。数据分析包括对使用的理论和理论提供的观点进行描述性和解释性总结。

结果

28 篇文章符合资格标准,102 篇文章仅简单提及理论。符合条件的文章在专业群体、学习阶段和期刊类型上存在差异。理论分为两大类:学习理论(n=20)和社会科学理论(n=11)。理论用于质量改进和患者安全教育的设计(n=12)或研究(n=17)。理论的范围表明,使用多种类型的理论提供了机会。

讨论

理论可以指导质量改进和患者安全教育实践的决策,或者在选择研究教育过程和结果的方法或视角方面发挥作用。教育者和研究人员应该围绕理论的使用做出深思熟虑的选择,这些选择与他们试图阐明的教育计划的各个方面相关。

相似文献

1
Theory in quality improvement and patient safety education: A scoping review.
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Dec;10(6):319-326. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00686-5. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
2
Theoretical approaches in the development of interventions to promote breastfeeding: A scoping review.
Midwifery. 2024 May;132:103988. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.103988. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Applications of social theories of learning in health professions education programs: A scoping review.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 28;9:912751. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.912751. eCollection 2022.
5
Patient safety education in undergraduate medical education through a global lens: a scoping review.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07159-x.
6
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
8
Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:971044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044. eCollection 2022.
9
How Theory Can Inform Our Understanding of Experiential Learning in Quality Improvement Education.
Acad Med. 2018 Dec;93(12):1784-1790. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002329.
10
A scoping review of Q methodology nursing education studies.
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105220. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105220. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing the Importance and Performance of Safety Education for Sports Participants with Disabilities in Korea.
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jul;54(7):1424-1433. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i7.19148.
3
Patient safety education in undergraduate medical education through a global lens: a scoping review.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07159-x.
5
Effects of an Experiential Learning Curriculum on Systems-Thinking.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Jun 14;11:23821205241262210. doi: 10.1177/23821205241262210. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Trends in patient safety education research for healthcare professional students over the past two decades: a bibliometric and content analysis.
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2358610. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2358610. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
7
Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Education in Postgraduate Training Program-A Survey of Residents in Saudi Arabia.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 May 6;11:23821205241253069. doi: 10.1177/23821205241253069. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Barriers to and enablers of quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jan 18;4(1):e0002756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002756. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Re-envisioning paradigms of education: towards awareness, alignment, and pluralism.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Aug;26(3):1045-1058. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10036-z. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Interprofessional and multiprofessional approaches in quality improvement education.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 May;26(2):615-636. doi: 10.1007/s10459-020-10004-z. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
4
The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework.
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):989-994. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075.
6
Theory, a lost character? As presented in general practice education research papers.
Med Educ. 2019 May;53(5):443-457. doi: 10.1111/medu.13793. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Long-term effects of an e-learning course on patient safety: A controlled longitudinal study with medical students.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):e0210947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210947. eCollection 2019.
8
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
9
Uncovering Cultural Barriers to Quality Improvement Learning in a Trauma Program: An Ethnographic Study.
J Surg Educ. 2019 Mar-Apr;76(2):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Aug 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验