Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mult Scler. 2022 Jul;28(8):1248-1256. doi: 10.1177/13524585211048401. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Few studies have addressed the results of educational efforts concerning proper use of McDonald criteria (MC) revisions outside multiple sclerosis (MS) subspecialty centers. Neurology residents and MS subspecialist neurologists demonstrated knowledge gaps for core elements of the MC in a recent prior study.
To assess comprehension and application of MC core elements by non-MS specialist neurologists in the United States who routinely diagnose MS.
Through a cross-sectional study design, a previously developed survey instrument was distributed online.
A total of 222 neurologists completed the study survey. Syndromes atypical for MS were frequently incorrectly considered "typical" MS presentations. Fourteen percent correctly identified definitions of both "periventricular" and "juxtacortical" lesions and 2% correctly applied these terms to 9/9 images. Twenty-four percent correctly identified all four central nervous system (CNS) regions for satisfaction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dissemination in space. In two presented cases, 61% and 71% correctly identified dissemination in time (DIT) was not fulfilled, and 85% and 86% subsequently accepted nonspecific historical symptoms without objective evidence for DIT fulfillment.
The high rate of knowledge deficiencies and application errors of core elements of the MC demonstrated by participants in this study raise pressing questions concerning adequacy of dissemination and educational efforts upon publication of revisions to MC.
很少有研究关注在多发性硬化症(MS)专业中心之外,教育努力对正确使用 McDonald 标准(MC)修订版的结果。在最近的一项研究中,神经内科住院医师和 MS 专科神经病学家表现出对 MC 的核心要素存在知识差距。
评估美国常规诊断 MS 的非 MS 专家神经病学家对 MC 核心要素的理解和应用。
通过横断面研究设计,在线分发了先前开发的调查工具。
共有 222 名神经病学家完成了研究调查。不符合 MS 典型表现的综合征经常被错误地认为是“典型”MS 表现。14%的人正确定义了“脑室周围”和“皮质下”病变的定义,并且只有 2%的人将这些术语正确应用于 9/9 张图像。24%的人正确识别满足磁共振成像(MRI)空间弥散的四个中枢神经系统(CNS)区域。在两个呈现的病例中,61%和 71%正确地识别到时间弥散(DIT)不满足,随后 85%和 86%接受了没有 DIT 满足的客观证据的非特异性病史症状。
本研究参与者表现出的 MC 核心要素知识缺陷和应用错误率很高,这引发了关于 MC 修订版发布后传播和教育努力是否充分的紧迫问题。