• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MOCART 评分的可靠性:系统评价。

Reliability of the MOCART score: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00603-w.

DOI:10.1186/s10195-021-00603-w
PMID:34613499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8494868/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present systematic review analysed the available literature to assess reliability of the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score in the evaluation of knee and ankle osteochondral lesions.

METHODS

All the studies using the MOCART score for knee and/or talus chondral defects were accessed in March 2021. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess associations between the MOCART score at last follow-up and data of patients at baseline, clinical scores and complications. A multiple linear model regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

The MOCART score evidenced no association with patient age (P = 0.6), sex (P = 0.1), body mass index (P = 0.06), defect size (P = 0.9), prior length of symptoms (P = 0.9) or visual analogue scale (P = 0.07). For chondral defects of the knee, no statistically significant association was found between the MOCART score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (P = 0.9) and with the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scales (P = 0.2), Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.2), visual analogue scale P = 0.07), rate of failure (P = 0.2) and revision (P = 0.9). For chondral defect of the talus, no statistically significant associations were found between the MOCART score and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (P = 0.3), Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.4), visual analogue scale (P = 0.1), rate of failure (P = 0.1) and revision (P = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

The MOCART score demonstrated no association with patient characteristics and with the surgical outcome in patients who underwent surgical management for knee and talus chondral defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

背景

本系统评价分析了现有文献,以评估磁共振软骨修复组织评分(MOCART)在膝关节和踝关节骨软骨病变评估中的可靠性。

方法

2021 年 3 月检索了所有使用 MOCART 评分评估膝关节和/或距骨软骨缺损的研究。进行了多变量分析,以评估末次随访时 MOCART 评分与患者基线时的患者特征、临床评分和并发症之间的关系。使用多元线性模型回归分析。

结果

MOCART 评分与患者年龄(P=0.6)、性别(P=0.1)、体重指数(P=0.06)、缺损大小(P=0.9)、症状持续时间(P=0.9)或视觉模拟评分(P=0.07)无关。对于膝关节的软骨缺损,MOCART 评分与国际膝关节文献委员会评分(P=0.9)和 Lysholm 膝关节评分量表(P=0.2)、Tegner 活动量表(P=0.2)、视觉模拟评分(P=0.07)、失败率(P=0.2)和翻修率(P=0.9)均无统计学显著相关性。对于距骨软骨缺损,MOCART 评分与美国骨科足踝协会评分(P=0.3)、Tegner 活动量表(P=0.4)、视觉模拟评分(P=0.1)、失败率(P=0.1)和翻修率(P=0.7)均无统计学显著相关性。

结论

在接受膝关节和距骨软骨缺损手术治疗的患者中,MOCART 评分与患者特征及手术结果无关。

证据水平

IV 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffcd/8494868/59756ac0af59/10195_2021_603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffcd/8494868/873b446da60f/10195_2021_603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffcd/8494868/59756ac0af59/10195_2021_603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffcd/8494868/873b446da60f/10195_2021_603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffcd/8494868/59756ac0af59/10195_2021_603_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of the MOCART score: a systematic review.MOCART 评分的可靠性:系统评价。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00603-w.
2
Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.异体骨软骨移植与自体骨软骨移植治疗距骨软骨缺损:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3447-3455. doi: 10.1177/03635465211037349. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Clinical and Radiological 2- to 8-Year Follow-up Study.自体软骨细胞-载体复合物移植治疗距骨骨软骨损伤:2-8 年临床及放射学随访研究
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1679-1686. doi: 10.1177/0363546519841574. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) as revision procedure for failed AMIC in recurrent symptomatic osteochondral defects of the talus.自体诱导软骨生成术(AMIC)作为复发性症状性距骨骨软骨缺损中 AMIC 失败的翻修手术。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 28;12(1):16244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20641-6.
5
Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques-a retrospective observational study.不同软骨修复技术的 MOCART(磁共振观察软骨修复组织)2.0 膝关节评分的可靠性:一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):5734-5745. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07688-1. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
6
Results 2 Years After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Using the Novocart 3D Scaffold: An Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Data.使用Novocart 3D支架进行基质相关自体软骨细胞移植2年后的结果:临床和放射学数据分析
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1618-27. doi: 10.1177/0363546514532337. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Management of Patellar Chondral Defects with Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) Compared to Microfractures: A Four Years Follow-Up Clinical Trial.自体基质诱导软骨形成(AMIC)与微骨折治疗髌骨软骨损伤的比较:一项四年随访临床试验
Life (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;11(2):141. doi: 10.3390/life11020141.
8
Clinical and MRI evaluation of medium- to long-term results after autologous osteochondral transplantation (OCT) in the knee joint.自体骨软骨移植(OCT)治疗膝关节后中长期临床和 MRI 评估。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jun;22(6):1288-97. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2834-7. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
9
Favorable long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes with high survivorship after autologous osteochondral transplantation of the talus.自体距骨骨软骨移植后具有良好的长期临床和影像学结果,存活率高。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jun;31(6):2166-2173. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07237-3. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Comparison of Autologous Osteoperiosteal and Osteochondral Transplantation for the Treatment of Large, Medial Cystic Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.自体骨-骨膜与骨软骨移植治疗距骨大内侧囊性骨软骨病变的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):769-777. doi: 10.1177/03635465211068529. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Autologous Osteochondral Transfer Demonstrates Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes and Durable Cartilage Properties: A Mean 4-Year Follow-up Using Quantitative MRI.自体骨软骨移植显示出令人满意的临床结果和持久的软骨特性:使用定量MRI进行的平均4年随访
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Aug 20;13(8):23259671251356267. doi: 10.1177/23259671251356267. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Regenerative Cartilage Treatment for Focal Chondral Defects in the Knee: Focus on Marrow-Stimulating and Cell-Based Scaffold Approaches.膝关节局灶性软骨缺损的再生软骨治疗:聚焦于骨髓刺激和基于细胞的支架方法。
Cells. 2025 Aug 7;14(15):1217. doi: 10.3390/cells14151217.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Analyzing MOCART 1 and 2.0.磁共振成像在自体骨髓基质诱导软骨生成治疗距骨骨软骨病变中的作用:分析 MOCART1 和 2.0。
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):639S-645S. doi: 10.1177/1947603520946382. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 Knee Score and Atlas.MOCART(磁共振观察软骨修复组织)2.0 膝关节评分及图谱
Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):571S-587S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519865308. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
3
MR imaging of cartilage repair surgery of the knee.
Correlation and Comparative Evaluation of MOCART and MOCART 2.0 for Assessing Cartilage Repair.
用于评估软骨修复的MOCART和MOCART 2.0的相关性及比较评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 18;61(4):745. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040745.
4
Osteoperiosteal versus osteochondral for autologous transplantation in the treatment of large cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus.距骨大囊性骨软骨损伤自体移植中骨膜骨移植与骨软骨移植的比较
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Feb 7;26(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00818-1.
5
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.膝关节韧带重建术后的最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和显著临床获益(SCB):一项系统评价
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 22;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02708-3.
6
Scaffolds for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Last Ten Years Literature.距骨骨软骨损伤的支架:过去十年文献的系统评价和荟萃分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;11(10):970. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11100970.
7
Acute Treatment of Osteochondral Detachment Following Patellar Dislocation: Clinical and Short-Term MRI Follow-Up.髌骨脱位后骨软骨分离的急性治疗:临床及短期MRI随访
Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;14(1):85. doi: 10.3390/life14010085.
8
Satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in patients treated with impaction bone grafting and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral knee defects.对于接受嵌压植骨和自体基质诱导软骨形成治疗的膝关节骨软骨缺损患者,患者报告的结果令人满意。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5698-5706. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07626-2. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
9
The AMADEUS score is not a sufficient predictor for functional outcome after autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) of the knee: data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU).AMADEUS 评分不能充分预测膝关节自体软骨细胞移植 (ACI) 后的功能结果:来自德国软骨注册处 (KnorpelRegister DGOU)的数据。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7097-7105. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05037-z. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
10
Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoral Condyle Chondral Lesions: Microfracture Versus Liquid Bioscaffold.关节镜治疗股骨髁软骨损伤:微骨折术与液体生物支架的比较
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Apr 8;57(6):975-982. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00878-7. eCollection 2023 Jun.
膝关节软骨修复手术的磁共振成像。
Clin Imaging. 2019 Nov-Dec;58:129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
4
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation "Segmental-Sandwich" Technique for Deep Osteochondral Defects in the Knee: Clinical Outcomes and Correlation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.自体软骨细胞移植“节段三明治”技术治疗膝关节深层骨软骨缺损:临床结果及与磁共振成像结果的相关性
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 May 28;7(5):2325967119847173. doi: 10.1177/2325967119847173. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Clinical and Radiological 2- to 8-Year Follow-up Study.自体软骨细胞-载体复合物移植治疗距骨骨软骨损伤:2-8 年临床及放射学随访研究
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1679-1686. doi: 10.1177/0363546519841574. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Is an Effective Treatment at Midterm Follow-up in Adolescents and Young Adults.基质相关自体软骨细胞植入术在青少年和青年成人中期随访中是一种有效的治疗方法。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Apr 25;7(4):2325967119841077. doi: 10.1177/2325967119841077. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
Allograft Compared with Autograft in Osteochondral Transplantation for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.同种异体移植物与自体移植物在距骨骨软骨病变治疗中的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):1838-1844. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01508.
8
Surgical treatment of chondral knee defects using a collagen membrane - autologus matrix-induced chondrogenesis.使用胶原膜-自体基质诱导软骨生成法对膝关节软骨缺损进行手术治疗。
Rev Bras Ortop. 2018 Sep 21;53(6):733-739. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.09.005. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.
9
All-arthroscopic AMIC (AT-AMIC) for the treatment of talar osteochondral defects: A short follow-up case series.全关节镜下自体基质诱导软骨修复术(AT-AMIC)治疗距骨骨软骨损伤:短期随访病例系列
Foot (Edinb). 2018 Dec;37:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
T2-relaxation time of cartilage repair tissue is associated with bone remodeling after spongiosa-augmented matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation.软骨修复组织的 T2 弛豫时间与骨基质增强型自体软骨细胞植入后海绵骨重塑相关。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Jan;27(1):90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Sep 22.