Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Br J Cancer. 2021 Dec;125(12):1632-1646. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01553-0. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Immunohistochemical loss of CDX2 has been proposed as a biomarker of dismal survival in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), especially in UICC Stage II/III. However, it remains unclear, how CDX2 expression is related to central hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-based morphologic parameters defined by 2019 WHO classification and how its prognostic relevance is compared to these parameters.
We evaluated CDX2 expression in 1003 CRCs and explored its prognostic relevance compared to CRC subtypes, tumour budding and WHO grade in the overall cohort and in specific subgroups.
CDX2-low/absent CRCs were enriched in specific morphologic subtypes, right-sided and microsatellite-instable (MSI-H) CRCs (P < 0.001) and showed worse survival characteristics in the overall cohort/UICC Stage II/III (e.g. DFS: P = 0.005) and in microsatellite stable and left-sided CRCs, but not in MSI-H or right-sided CRCs. Compared with CDX2, all HE-based markers showed a significantly better prognostic discrimination in all scenarios. In multivariate analyses including all morphologic parameters, CDX2 was not an independent prognostic factor.
CDX2 loss has some prognostic impact in univariate analyses, but its prognostic relevance is considerably lower compared to central HE-based morphologic parameters defined by the WHO classification and vanishes in multivariate analyses incorporating these factors.
免疫组织化学检测 CDX2 缺失被认为是结直肠癌(CRC)不良生存的生物标志物,尤其是在 UICC Ⅱ/Ⅲ期。然而,CDX2 表达与 2019 年 WHO 分类定义的中心苏木精-伊红(HE)形态学参数之间的关系以及其预后相关性与这些参数相比如何仍不清楚。
我们评估了 1003 例 CRC 中 CDX2 的表达,并在整个队列和特定亚组中,与 CRC 亚型、肿瘤芽生和 WHO 分级比较,探讨了其预后相关性。
CDX2 低/缺失 CRCs 在特定形态亚型、右侧和微卫星不稳定(MSI-H)CRCs 中更为丰富(P<0.001),在整个队列/UICC Ⅱ/Ⅲ期(例如 DFS:P=0.005)和微卫星稳定和左侧 CRCs 中显示出更差的生存特征,但在 MSI-H 或右侧 CRCs 中则不然。与 CDX2 相比,所有基于 HE 的标志物在所有情况下均显示出更好的预后区分能力。在包括所有形态学参数的多变量分析中,CDX2 不是独立的预后因素。
在单变量分析中,CDX2 缺失具有一定的预后影响,但与 WHO 分类定义的中心 HE 形态学参数相比,其预后相关性要低得多,并且在纳入这些因素的多变量分析中消失。