膝关节置换术后一种新型伤口闭合方法的感染率相似。
Similar infection rates in a new wound closure method following knee arthroplasty.
作者信息
Liu Shuyang, Andrews Samantha N, Morikawa Landon H, Matsumoto Maya Y, Mathews Kristin A, Nakasone Cass K
机构信息
John A Burns School of Medicine, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
University of Hawai'i, Department of Surgery, 1356 Lusitana Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
出版信息
J Orthop. 2021 Sep 22;27:141-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.09.009. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
Abstract
Surgical site infections, defined as acute wound infections requiring surgical intervention within 90 days post-surgery, were retrospectively compared between a novel, zipper-like closure method (ZM) and staples in 682 patients (904 knees) and 772 patients (971 knees), respectively. The incidence of deep infections was 0.6% for staples and 0.2% for ZM (p = 0.169) and superficial infections was 0.1% for staples and 0.0% for ZM (p = 0.518). With no difference in wound complications, the ZM may be preferred since the two-week post-operative clinic visit required for wound check and staple removal was eliminated, thereby, decreasing clinic volume.
摘要
手术部位感染定义为术后90天内需要手术干预的急性伤口感染，分别对682例患者（904个膝关节）采用新型拉链式闭合方法（ZM）和772例患者（971个膝关节）采用吻合钉进行了回顾性比较。吻合钉组深部感染发生率为0.6%，ZM组为0.2%（p = 0.169）；吻合钉组浅表感染发生率为0.1%，ZM组为0.0%（p = 0.518）。由于伤口并发症无差异，ZM可能更受青睐，因为省去了术后两周伤口检查和拆除吻合钉所需的门诊就诊，从而减少了门诊量。
相似文献
1
Similar infection rates in a new wound closure method following knee arthroplasty.膝关节置换术后一种新型伤口闭合方法的感染率相似。
J Orthop. 2021 Sep 22;27:141-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.09.009. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
2
Staple versus suture closure for ankle fracture fixation: Retrospective chart review for safety and outcomes.用于踝关节骨折固定的吻合钉与缝线闭合：安全性和疗效的回顾性图表审查
Foot (Edinb). 2018 Dec;37:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
3
Comparing Steri-Strip and surgical staple wound closures after primary total knee arthroplasties.初次全膝关节置换术后Steri-Strip与外科吻合钉伤口闭合的比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jan;27(1):113-118. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1848-x. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
4
Using a non-invasive secure skin closure following total knee arthroplasty leads to fewer wound complications and no patient home care visits compared to surgical staples.与手术吻合钉相比，全膝关节置换术后使用无创安全皮肤闭合技术可减少伤口并发症，且无需患者接受家庭护理访视。
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1221-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
5
Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Skin Closure by Prolene or Staples in Bilateral Simultaneous Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Parallel Design Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.双侧同期膝关节置换术患者中使用普理灵或吻合钉进行皮肤缝合后手术部位感染的比较：一项平行设计随机对照试验方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2021 Aug 6;25(1):154-159. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.153. eCollection 2021.
6
A randomised controlled trial comparing skin closure in total knee arthroplasty in the same knee: nylon sutures versus skin staples.一项在同一膝关节进行全膝关节置换术时比较皮肤缝合方式的随机对照试验：尼龙缝线与皮肤吻合钉。
Bone Joint Res. 2016 May;5(5):185-90. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.55.2000629.
7
[Metal staples versus conventional suture for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty].[全膝关节置换术中金属吻合钉与传统缝线用于伤口闭合的比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(3):233-7.
8
Skin closure with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and polyester mesh after primary total knee arthroplasty offers superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared to staples: a prospective trial.初次全膝关节置换术后使用 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和聚酯网进行皮肤缝合，与使用订书钉相比，可获得更好的美容效果和患者满意度：一项前瞻性试验。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):447-453. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02591-4. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Evaluating Skin Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty-What Is the Best Method?一项评估全膝关节置换术后皮肤闭合的Meta分析和系统评价——最佳方法是什么？
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2920-2927. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction compared between staples and subcuticular suture technique for wound closure after primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.在初次全膝关节置换术后，比较皮内缝合与皮下缝合两种缝合技术的美容效果和患者满意度：一项随机对照试验。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Sep;140(9):1255-1263. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03479-3. Epub 2020 May 18.
引用本文的文献
1
Severe patellofemoral arthritis does not compromise 6-month post-operative range of motion or function following unicondylar knee arthroplasty.单间室膝关节置换术后 6 个月时，严重髌股关节炎并不影响关节活动度或功能。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6791-6797. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04978-9. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Preoperative Educational Classes in Elderly Patients May Not be Necessary Prior to Elective Joint Arthroplasty.老年患者在择期关节置换术前可能不需要接受术前教育课程。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2023 Jun;82(6):135-140.
本文引用的文献
1
Day of surgery discharge success after implementation of a rapid discharge protocol following unilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.单侧单髁膝关节置换术后实施快速出院方案后的手术出院日成功率。
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):1043-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Patient Satisfaction and Cosmetic Outcome in a Randomized, Prospective Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty Skin Closure Comparing Zip Surgical Skin Closure with Staples.全膝关节置换术皮肤缝合的随机前瞻性研究中患者满意度与美容效果比较：拉链式手术皮肤缝合与钉合术
Cureus. 2020 Jan 19;12(1):e6705. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6705.
3
Variability of patient and surgical risk factors for infection in a single, urban, academic total joint replacement center.在一个城市学术性单中心全关节置换中心，患者及手术感染风险因素的变异性。
J Orthop. 2019 Nov 13;19:178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.005. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
4
Possible risk factors for acute and chronic deep periprosthetic joint infections in primary total knee arthroplasty. Do BMI, smoking, urinary tract infections, gender, and ASA classification have an impact?初次全膝关节置换术中急性和慢性假体周围深部感染的潜在危险因素。体重指数、吸烟、尿路感染、性别和美国麻醉医师协会分级有影响吗？
J Orthop. 2019 Nov 27;19:111-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.035. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
5
A Novel Skin Closure Device for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Randomized Controlled Trial versus Staples.一种新型的全膝关节置换皮肤闭合装置：随机对照试验与缝线比较。
J Knee Surg. 2020 Nov;33(11):1116-1120. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692628. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Has Fewer Complications but Higher Revision Rates Than Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Study of Large United States Databases.在一项对美国大型数据库的研究中，单髁膝关节置换术比全膝关节置换术并发症更少，但翻修率更高。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
7
Is Operative Time a Predictor for Post-Operative Infection in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?初次全膝关节置换术后感染与手术时间的关系
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S331-S336. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Surgical site infection in overweight and obese Total Knee Arthroplasty patients.超重和肥胖全膝关节置换术患者的手术部位感染
J Orthop. 2018 Feb 21;15(2):328-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.02.009. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
The Seasonal Variability of Surgical Site Infections in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.膝关节和髋关节置换术后手术部位感染的季节性变化。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):510-514.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.043. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Using a non-invasive secure skin closure following total knee arthroplasty leads to fewer wound complications and no patient home care visits compared to surgical staples.与手术吻合钉相比，全膝关节置换术后使用无创安全皮肤闭合技术可减少伤口并发症，且无需患者接受家庭护理访视。
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1221-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
Zotero 插件